LuXugang commented on code in PR #13899:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13899#discussion_r1816108095
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery.java:
##
@@ -186,10 +186,44 @@ public boolean isCacheable(LeafReaderContext
jpountz commented on code in PR #13951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13951#discussion_r1815149823
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriterRAMManager.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
mikemccand commented on code in PR #13572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13572#discussion_r1814796588
##
lucene/native/src/c/dotProduct.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreeme
jpountz commented on code in PR #13949:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13949#discussion_r1815193079
##
lucene/s3directory/build.gradle:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.
mdmarshmallow commented on code in PR #13951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13951#discussion_r1815876685
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriterRAMManager.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under o
mkhludnev commented on issue #9814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/9814#issuecomment-2435334638
Hi,
Is there a similar query for docValues only fields?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13782:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13782#issuecomment-2436563274
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13879#issuecomment-2436563159
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
benwtrent opened a new pull request, #13953:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13953
Need to ensure doc order as some docs have scores that are exactly the same.
closes: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13946
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
shubhamvishu commented on code in PR #13950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13950#discussion_r1815551922
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanQuery.java:
##
@@ -87,6 +87,28 @@ public Builder add(BooleanClause clause) {
return this;
}
shubhamvishu commented on code in PR #13950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13950#discussion_r1815552155
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanQuery.java:
##
@@ -87,6 +87,28 @@ public Builder add(BooleanClause clause) {
return this;
}
benwtrent commented on issue #13946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13946#issuecomment-2435510156
```
1> 0 doc: 3 id: 0 score: 2.8378134
1> 1 doc: 0 id: 3 score: 0.16505925
1> 2 doc: 1 id: 2 score: 0.16505925
```
I think gitbisect might be a red herring?
mdmarshmallow commented on PR #13951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13951#issuecomment-2436487725
> Thanks for looking into it. It feels like there should be closer
integration between this and the existing
`FlushPolicy`/`FlushByRamOrCountsPolicy`?
So I actually had the
shubhamvishu commented on PR #13950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13950#issuecomment-2436351224
Thanks everyone for taking a look! As per comments the `#isPureDisjunction`
and `#isTwoClausePureDisjunctionWithTerms` seems to be the debatable ones :
- About `#isTwoClausePu
jpountz opened a new pull request, #13955:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13955
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-m
jpountz opened a new pull request, #13954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13954
When `totalHitsThreshold` is `Integer.MAX_VALUE`, dynamic pruning is never
used and all hits get evaluated. Thus, the minimum competitive score always
stays at zero, and there is nothing to exchange
gautamworah96 commented on issue #13551:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13551#issuecomment-2436108800
@uschindler At Amazon, we implemented the `mmapDir.setPreload((name,ctx) ->
name.endsWith(".vec"));` style fix you had suggested but later realized that
this would not work fo
ljak commented on PR #12938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12938#issuecomment-2435843480
Closing as @vletard continued the conversation over
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13165
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
ljak closed pull request #12938: Made the UnifiedHighlighter's
hasUnrecognizedQuery function processes FunctionQuery the same way as
MatchAllDocsQuery and MatchNoDocsQuery queries for performance reasons.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12938
--
This is an automated message from t
jpountz commented on code in PR #13950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13950#discussion_r1815175858
##
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanQuery.java:
##
@@ -136,20 +158,20 @@ public List clauses() {
}
/** Return the collection of queries for
jpountz commented on PR #13944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13944#issuecomment-2435542959
I wouldn't sort them, and just rely on the order that the caller supplied?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
gsmiller commented on PR #13950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13950#issuecomment-2435485794
> This LGTM but it has been this way for so long I wonder if someone with
more historical knowledge will have a rationale for hiding these things?
I took a quick peek at the git h
gsmiller commented on PR #13950:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13950#issuecomment-2435456274
> This LGTM but it has been this way for so long I wonder if someone with
more historical knowledge will have a rationale for hiding these things?
--
This is an automated message from
benwtrent merged PR #13947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13947
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.a
mikemccand commented on PR #13572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13572#issuecomment-2435099386
@goankur -- thank you for pulling out the actual native code into a new
`native` Lucene module. I'm not sure we need a new module -- could we use
`misc` or `sandbox` maybe?
I
mikemccand commented on code in PR #13572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13572#discussion_r1814797680
##
lucene/core/src/java21/org/apache/lucene/internal/vectorization/Lucene99MemorySegmentScalarQuantizedVectorScorer.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,407 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to t
stefanvodita merged PR #13942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13942
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucen
javanna opened a new issue, #13952:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13952
Search concurrency creates one task per slice. A slice is a collection of
one or more segment partitions (although segments are not split into partitions
by default just yet). The slicing mechanism allows
navneet1v commented on issue #13920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13920#issuecomment-2434499294
> Opening new readers is too expensive and mostly not useful.
@uschindler one question on this, the reason why you say opening new readers
is expensive because readers mostl
navneet1v commented on issue #13920:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13920#issuecomment-2434404176
@uschindler and @jpountz thanks for your inputs and detailed explanation.
@shatejas I think all the required details are present, so are you going to
raise a PR for this?
@
30 matches
Mail list logo
