bugmakerr commented on issue #13643:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13643#issuecomment-2287906685
> I wonder if it's possible for this method to ever be invoked with a
document that's "before" an established "after" value.
This method is related to missing values, i
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13382:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13382#issuecomment-2287479347
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13602#issuecomment-2287478715
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
uschindler commented on PR #13652:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13652#issuecomment-2287192249
> I don't remember, did we backport Chris changes to java 20, too?
No we did not. Nevertheless, maybe the constants code backport would be cool.
--
This is an automated messag
uschindler commented on PR #13652:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13652#issuecomment-2287184150
Maybe for consistency it would be good. I don't remember, did we backport
Chris changes to java 20, too?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
jpountz closed pull request #13631: Slightly speed up decoding blocks of
postings/freqs/positions.
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13631
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
jpountz commented on PR #13652:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13652#issuecomment-2287039270
@uschindler I was wondering while doing this backport: would you apply the
same refactoring wrt `PanamaVectorConstants` to the `src/java20` folder, or
would you keep it as-is?
--
This
dweiss commented on PR #13649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13649#issuecomment-2287039302
> Hi, The main problem was that it wasn't able to find the task "eclipse".
You hacked around this by converting the root project to a java project.
Well, I didn't hack around it - i
dweiss commented on issue #13638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13638#issuecomment-2287035129
Which git version are you using? I think tidy will "clean up" those toml
files by reordering them - there is a plugin for doing this. This plugin may be
writing crlfs... but I don't
jpountz merged PR #13636:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13636
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apa
benwtrent opened a new pull request, #13651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13651
# Not only a draft, but a very rough one indeed
Not opening for the sake of review, but just openness and for those curious
about the work.
# Highlevel design
RaBitQ is basicall
benwtrent opened a new issue, #13650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13650
### Description
There have been multiple discussions around supporting higher vector
quantization levels (e.g. more than scalar quantization can provide).
We (elastic) have been doing some
gsmiller commented on issue #13643:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13643#issuecomment-2286585133
Thanks @bugmakerr. I was thinking about this change a bit more and
wondering how you came across the issue. I definitely agree there's an
opportunity here to tighten up the log
uschindler commented on issue #13638:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13638#issuecomment-2286541359
I will check what's wrong with my toml file. I have crlf handling completely
switched off in my git config. It should not touch any line endings.
--
This is an automated messag
uschindler commented on PR #13649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13649#issuecomment-2286522904
Hi,
The main problem was that it wasn't able to find the task "eclipse". You
hacked around this by converting the root project to a java project.
I have no idea how it was be
msokolov commented on issue #13626:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13626#issuecomment-2286421337
OK, I don't know if we want to go back and revisit all this stuff, but it
seems to me as if we stumbled into requiring PerFieldCodec without necessarily
realizing we had done so?
dweiss opened a new pull request, #13649:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13649
A fix to https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13638.
I don't see how the refactoring in
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13484 had something to do with the ide
setup breaking. There are
msokolov commented on issue #13565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13565#issuecomment-2286395734
One thing that confused me about the `BPIndexReorderer` solution: what
happens if the IWC has indexSort configured *and* we apply the
BPReorderingMergePolicy? I guess the index sor
msokolov commented on issue #13565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13565#issuecomment-2286296865
Yes, I'd like this to be compatible with a different index sort for docids.
I think it makes sense when you have hybrid search; keywords + semantic in the
same query. But I suppose
msokolov commented on issue #13640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13640#issuecomment-2286271018
found and fixed a branch_9x-only problem. Hopefully this calms down now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
msokolov merged PR #13648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13648
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap
msokolov commented on PR #13648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13648#issuecomment-2286265814
addresses #13640
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
msokolov opened a new pull request, #13648:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13648
It turns out that on branch9x we were not calling connectComponents on
flush, only on merge, so the graph would grow when merging violating the
stability test
--
This is an automated message fr
bugmakerr commented on issue #13643:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13643#issuecomment-2285668553
> As it's currently written, I believe it will pass even without your
change.
@gsmiller Yes, you are right. The method
`assertNonCompetitiveHitsAreSkipped` cannot make
24 matches
Mail list logo
