github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13508#issuecomment-2224171133
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13521:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13521#issuecomment-2224171037
This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If
the PR is waiting for review, notify the d...@lucene.apache.org list. Thank you
for your contributi
MilindShyani commented on issue #13519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13519#issuecomment-2224005032
Hello!
So I just did the calculation and I get the following
1) I get an innocuous sign discrepancy, i.e., the term `-
SIGNED_CORRECTION * alpha` should instead
msokolov commented on PR #13566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13566#issuecomment-2223828635
note: addresses https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12627
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
msokolov commented on PR #13566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13566#issuecomment-2223669457
... oh another TODO is whether or not to worry about graph levels > 0. I
kind of think it's not needed since no matter which graph component you
traverse on the higher level, you eventu
msokolov opened a new pull request, #13566:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13566
This looks pretty good to me, as far as it goes, but I wanted to post early
so people can poke holes / suggest improvements. Remaining TODO's I'm tracking
are:
* testing recall (might improve a b
benwtrent commented on issue #13564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13564#issuecomment-2223362650
@jmazanec15
> I think we would need to refine not the top k but the top r*k and then
reduce to k
100%, I wasn't clear. Yes, over all segments, we gather some approx
jmazanec15 commented on issue #13564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13564#issuecomment-2223317735
> I think the API would be tricky, but I am all for this idea
Yes agree, Ill think on this a little bit. Ill start with a PoC and go from
there.
> Whatever the desig
msokolov merged PR #13561:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13561
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.ap
benwtrent commented on issue #13564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13564#issuecomment-2223238648
I think the API would be tricky, but I am all for this idea. The ability to
"approximately score" and then do second pass to "exact score" is useful for
all sorts of levels of qua
magibney commented on PR #13555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13555#issuecomment-2223189418
Thanks for the suggestions! Most of these are now addressed (with a couple
of questions: 1. maybe still need chm.computeIfAbsent() loop, 2. which if any
Arena methods to throw UOE).
romseygeek commented on code in PR #13562:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13562#discussion_r1674172561
##
lucene/queries/src/java/org/apache/lucene/queries/intervals/Intervals.java:
##
@@ -206,6 +210,91 @@ public static IntervalsSource wildcard(BytesRef wildcard,
in
magibney commented on code in PR #13555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13555#discussion_r1674172898
##
lucene/core/src/java21/org/apache/lucene/store/GroupedArena.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+
jmazanec15 opened a new issue, #13564:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13564
### Description
With quantization techniques that are compressing vectors in memory further
and further, because of how much information is lost, recall is going to drop.
However, with the curre
iverase opened a new pull request, #13563:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13563
Currently the DocValues skipper index collects the stats every 4096
documents that allow implementors to used them to decide if they want to
process those documents or they can be skipped. The idea o
magibney commented on code in PR #13555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13555#discussion_r1674096237
##
lucene/core/src/java21/org/apache/lucene/store/GroupedArena.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+
ChrisHegarty commented on PR #13497:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13497#issuecomment-905533
> Regardless that its already much slower for the int4 case on both jdk 21 &
22.
@benwtrent I was not aware, lemme take a look.
--
This is an automated message from the Apa
vsop-479 commented on PR #13557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13557#issuecomment-409330
I think I could dig more by printing assembly code.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
uschindler commented on code in PR #13555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13555#discussion_r1673613242
##
lucene/core/src/java21/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInputProvider.java:
##
@@ -24,12 +24,15 @@
import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.nio.file.Sta
uschindler commented on code in PR #13555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13555#discussion_r1673613242
##
lucene/core/src/java21/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInputProvider.java:
##
@@ -24,12 +24,15 @@
import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.nio.file.Sta
ChrisHegarty commented on code in PR #13555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13555#discussion_r1673550548
##
lucene/core/src/java21/org/apache/lucene/store/MemorySegmentIndexInputProvider.java:
##
@@ -24,12 +24,15 @@
import java.nio.file.Path;
import java.nio.file.S
ChrisHegarty commented on code in PR #13555:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13555#discussion_r1673543647
##
lucene/core/src/java21/org/apache/lucene/store/GroupedArena.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or mo
jpountz commented on PR #13557:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13557#issuecomment-207417
It looks like it doesn't make a difference? `HighTermDayOfYearSort` has a
speedup with a low p-value, but then `HighTermMonthSort` has a slowdown with a
low p-value as well, so I suspect
23 matches
Mail list logo