Hi,
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 16:24:44 chuck.pier...@nokia.com wrote:
> Is there an interest on this list in learning about the business
> implications of going LGPL using the Trolltech example?
Yes, I think this would be very helpful to quite a few of us. License
discussions happen quite ofte
...@nokia.com; charleyb...@gmail.com; bm_witn...@yahoo.com
*Cc:* interest@qt-project.org
*Subject:* Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
I'd be curious.
It seems to me that that strategy would see use go up, then some time
later commercial licensing would pick up, as the barrier to entry came
: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
I'd be curious.
It seems to me that that strategy would see use go up, then some time later
commercial licensing would pick up, as the barrier to entry came down, and user
bases were established which required support, which in turn enabled comme
enses.
From: "chuck.pier...@nokia.com"
To: charleyb...@gmail.com; bm_witn...@yahoo.com
Cc: interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
Hi,
Is there an interest on this list in learning abo
Hi,
Is there an interest on this list in learning about the business implications
of going LGPL using the Trolltech example?
Trolltech's acquisition by Nokia allowed it to add the LGPL license option and
then continue conducting business for the next 3 years. If you look at the
aggregate busin
Op 16-8-2012 14:00, Thiago Macieira schreef:
> On quinta-feira, 16 de agosto de 2012 07.12.23, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
>>Please don't distort my argument. My argument, boiled down,
>>is that switching to any open-source licensing approach
>>destroys the owner's direct value in a software
On quinta-feira, 16 de agosto de 2012 07.12.23, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> Please don't distort my argument. My argument, boiled down,
> is that switching to any open-source licensing approach
> destroys the owner's direct value in a software property.
> I don't argue whether that's GPL, LGPL,
n Qt;
there's no "would have" about it.)
Atlant
-Original Message-
From: interest-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch@qt-project.org
[mailto:interest-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Sascha Cunz
Sent: Wednesday
16.08.2012, 01:21, "Sascha Cunz" :
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 08:06:08 AM Atlant Schmidt wrote:
>> Unfortunately, as has already been mentioned by several
>> other folks, the fact that a given piece of software is
>> licensed under the terms of the (L)GPL is a huge factor
>> argu
On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 08:06:08 AM Atlant Schmidt wrote:
Atlant:
> And the "indirect sales value" matters not a
> whit to the owner of the software (or the
> shareholders of the owner) unless the owner
> is actively reaping a significant fraction
> of that "indirect sales value" (w
Hey now. I'm not "paranoid" or "idiotic", just lazy enough to be
willing to pay for a commercial license so I don't have to worry about
staying LGPL compliant.
Karl
On 2012-08-15 08:12, Konrad Rosenbaum
wrote:
> You are missing my point: there are only a few areas where
you can't use
> (L
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 14:06:08 you wrote:
> Konrad:
> > Wrong: it decreases the direct sales value, but
> > hugely increases the use value and with that the
> > indirect sales value.
>
> And the "indirect sales value" matters not a
> whit to the owner of the software (or the
> sharehol
On 08/15/2012 01:06 PM, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> Konrad:
>
>> Wrong: it decreases the direct sales value, but
>> hugely increases the use value and with that the
>> indirect sales value.
>
>And the "indirect sales value" matters not a
>whit to the owner of the software (or the
>sharehold
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 14:06:08 Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> I'm sorry; the FOSS folks have argued for years
> that they have a workable financial model but
> I see no evidence that this is true for anything
> other than individuals and relatively small-scale
> commercial operations.
Well
is, and the like.
Atlant
-Original Message-
From: interest-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch@qt-project.org
[mailto:interest-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Konrad Rosenbaum
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 5:02 AM
To: interest@qt-project
Hi,
On Tuesday 14 August 2012 17:47:37 Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> Chuck:
> > Adding LGPL as a license option had an enormous impact on
> > the commercial business but it also grew the number of users
> > by an order of magnitude over the same time period.
>
> But all of those new LGPL users were *
On terça-feira, 14 de agosto de 2012 10.08.12, Karl Ruetz wrote:
> As Obtuse as it might sound, for my company, it's worth the cost of
> the commercial license just so we don't have to tip toe around all the
> LPGL conditions and exceptions.
And this is the reason why I support the commercial lice
As Obtuse as it might sound, for my company, it's worth the cost of
the commercial license just so we don't have to tip toe around all the
LPGL conditions and exceptions.
We have found Digia to be very
reliable and responsive and, for now, we are very optimistic about
Digia's future with Qt.
On terça-feira, 14 de agosto de 2012 11.47.37, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> An enormous-but-non-paying user base still supports
> my argument that going FOSS decreases the commercial
> value of a software property.
Only if you think in direct and restrict terms of "cash flow generated from
sale o
On terça-feira, 14 de agosto de 2012 11.44.54, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> You don't find these paragraphs from LGPL 2.1, if not ambiguous,
> at least "interesting"?
Don't forget an important detail: Qt isn't licensed "pure" LGPL 2.1. It's
licensed LGPL 2.1 + exception:
Nokia Qt LGPL Exception ve
>
> >> most of the commercial licensees are sticking with the commercial
> license
> > because of the ambiguity
> >> with the LGPL and how to apply it; and the fact that while Nokia did do
> > that, they have not provided any
> >> clarity to its use.
> >
> > ... while developers of proprietary s
rg
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
--
Shriramana Sharma
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
t-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
chuck.pier...@nokia.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:24 AM
To: scott.bl...@onshorecs.com; bm_witn...@yahoo.com; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
Adding LGPL as a license opti
m: interest-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch@qt-project.org
[mailto:interest-bounces+aschmidt=dekaresearch@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
André Somers
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:12 AM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
Op 14-8-2012 17:06, BR
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:53 PM, wrote:
> Adding LGPL as a license option had an enormous impact on the
commercial business but it also grew the number of users by an order of
magnitude over the same time period.
So IMHO even though one
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:53 PM, wrote:
> Adding LGPL as a license option had an enormous impact on the commercial
> business but it also grew the number of users by an order of magnitude over
> the same time period.
So IMHO even though one may think Nokia didn't take proper care of Qt,
one bi
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:36 PM, BRM wrote:
>
> Some may yes, but I think the general ambiguity left by the LGPL requirements
> still pushes most towards commercial licenses.
IANAL but I'm not sure what ambiguity is there to the LGPL. It is
probably just plain FUD working there. So effectively t
@qt-project.org
[mailto:interest-bounces+chuck.piercey=nokia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
ext Scott Aron Bloom
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 8:19 AM
To: BRM; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
> To: BRM
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to a
> To: BRM
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia 14.08.2012,
> 18:50, "BRM" :
>> most of the commercial licensees are sticking with the commercial
>> license
> because of the ambiguity
>> with the LGPL and how to apply it; and the
Op 14-8-2012 17:06, BRM schreef:
>> To: BRM
>> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
>> 14.08.2012, 18:50, "BRM" :
>>> most of the commercial licensees are sticking with the commercial license
>> because of the ambiguity
>>&g
> To: BRM
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
> 14.08.2012, 18:50, "BRM" :
>> most of the commercial licensees are sticking with the commercial license
> because of the ambiguity
>> with the LGPL and how to apply it; and the fact that whi
14.08.2012, 18:50, "BRM" :
> most of the commercial licensees are sticking with the commercial license
> because of the ambiguity
> with the LGPL and how to apply it; and the fact that while Nokia did do that,
> they have not provided any
> clarity to its use.
... while developers of proprieta
> From: André Somers
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
>
> Op 14-8-2012 16:19, Rui Maciel schreef:
>> On 08/14/2012 03:08 PM, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
>>> And I
Op 14-8-2012 16:19, Rui Maciel schreef:
> On 08/14/2012 03:08 PM, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
>> And I never said it did. I simply said that Nokia
>> destroyed all (+/-) of their own investment in
>> Trolltech, perhaps as a result of driving Qt into
>> (further into?) FOSS territory.
> Ho
On 08/14/2012 03:08 PM, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
>And I never said it did. I simply said that Nokia
>destroyed all (+/-) of their own investment in
>Trolltech, perhaps as a result of driving Qt into
>(further into?) FOSS territory.
How could anyone drive Qt into FOSS territory when it
rom: BRM [mailto:bm_witn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:04 AM
To: Atlant Schmidt; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
> From: Atlant Schmidt
> To: 'Bob Hood' ; "interest@qt-project.org"
>
> Sent: Tuesda
> From: Atlant Schmidt
> To: 'Bob Hood' ; "interest@qt-project.org"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
>> Wait a sec... wasn't that because Nokia bought a highly valuable
>>
org] On Behalf Of
Bob Hood
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 4:57 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
On 8/13/2012 9:30 AM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> Am 13.08.2012 um 16:00 schrieb Atlant Schmidt :
>
>> ...
>> And this is what Nokia has
On 8/13/2012 9:30 AM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> Am 13.08.2012 um 16:00 schrieb Atlant Schmidt :
>
>> ...
>> And this is what Nokia has just done; in the course
>> of just four years, they destroyed essentially all
>> of their investors' capital that was invested in
>> acquiring Trolltech.
>
>
Am 13.08.2012 um 16:00 schrieb Atlant Schmidt :
> ...
> And this is what Nokia has just done; in the course
> of just four years, they destroyed essentially all
> of their investors' capital that was invested in
> acquiring Trolltech.
Wait a sec... wasn't that because Nokia bought a highly va
On segunda-feira, 13 de agosto de 2012 15.28.35, Rui Maciel wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 03:14 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > So, in all, you*may* be right that giving a product under a freer licence
> > lowers its monetary value -- it's intuitive.
>
> That is also debatable. For example, Red Hat manag
On 08/13/2012 03:14 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> So, in all, you*may* be right that giving a product under a freer licence
> lowers its monetary value -- it's intuitive.
That is also debatable. For example, Red Hat manages to pull an annual
revenue of around 1 billion dollars while giving away
On Monday 13 August 2012 16:00:25 Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> But the original owner of a proprietary software
> product who then takes it "open sourced" seems to
> invariable take a bath, flushing essentially all
> of their investment in that product down the drain.
> And this is what Nokia
On segunda-feira, 13 de agosto de 2012 10.00.25, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> But the original owner of a proprietary software
> product who then takes it "open sourced" seems to
> invariable take a bath, flushing essentially all
> of their investment in that product down the drain.
> And this
On 08/13/2012 03:00 PM, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
>But the original owner of a proprietary software
>product who then takes it "open sourced" seems to
>invariable take a bath, flushing essentially all
>of their investment in that product down the drain.
>And this is what Nokia has j
..@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:54 AM
To: Atlant Schmidt; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
> From: Atlant Schmidt
> Subject: RE: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
> BRM:
>> And that's hogwash.
>
> Okay,
> From: Atlant Schmidt
> Subject: RE: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
> BRM:
>> And that's hogwash.
>
> Okay, I'll make my statement more clear:
>
> "Still, this may serve as an indication that once a company
> converts a
icrosystems also proved this when
they open-sourced Solaris.
Do you have a counter-example?
Atlant
-Original Message-
From: BRM [mailto:bm_witn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 9:30 AM
To: Atlant Schmidt; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [I
> From: Atlant Schmidt
> Still, this may serve as an indication that once a company
> converts a piece of closed-source software to open-sourced
> software, that company has effectively thrown away most of
> the *MONETARY* value of that software.
And that's hogwash.
What's the *MONETARY* v
012 8:22 AM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
On segunda-feira, 13 de agosto de 2012 07.57.48, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> All:
>
> Apparently, the price Digia paid for the rest of Qt was
> EUR4m (US$4.9m).
>
> That's quite a
Den 13-08-2012 13:57, Atlant Schmidt skrev:
>Apparently, the price Digia paid for the rest of Qt was
>EUR4m (US$4.9m).
>
>That's quite a mark-down from the US$150m Nokia paid to
>buy Trolltech in 2008!
>
> http://www.financial-news.co.uk/6900/2012/08/finnish-handset-maker-nokia-exit
On segunda-feira, 13 de agosto de 2012 07.57.48, Atlant Schmidt wrote:
> All:
>
> Apparently, the price Digia paid for the rest of Qt was
> EUR4m (US$4.9m).
>
> That's quite a mark-down from the US$150m Nokia paid to
> buy Trolltech in 2008!
>
>Atlant
e.org; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
On 9 August 2012 22:08, Richard Moore [r...@kde.org] wrote:
>On 9 August 2012 12:52, Lorn Potter wrote:
>> They are part of this. 3 tons of CI servers are heading north in the coming
>> weeks/mont
On 9 August 2012 22:08, Richard Moore [r...@kde.org] wrote:
>On 9 August 2012 12:52, Lorn Potter wrote:
>> They are part of this. 3 tons of CI servers are heading north in the coming
>> weeks/months.
>
>Are Rohan and Jason in the crate too?
Nobody from Digia has approached me so far, but I'm ope
Best news! +best wishes!!
2012/8/9 Eric Landuyt
> Hello ,
>
> seems like a very good news:
>
> http://www.digia.com/en/Home/Company/News/Digia-to-acquire-Qt-from-Nokia/
>
> --
> Eric Landuyt, Developer - mailto:e...@datarescue.be
> DataRescue sa/nv - http://www.datarescue.com
>
> ___
Yeah!! The best news for Qt in this year!
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Eric Landuyt wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> seems like a very good news:
>
> http://www.digia.com/en/Home/Company/News/Digia-to-acquire-Qt-from-Nokia/
>
> --
> Eric Landuyt, Developer - mailto:e...@datarescue.be
> DataRescue sa/
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:10:44 +0200 André Somers
wrote:
> Op 9-8-2012 10:42, Thiago Macieira schreef:
> > On quinta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2012 11.24.37, Sivan Greenberg
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Thiago Macieira
> >> wrote:
> >>> It's too bad that they couldn't take over the
Great News!!!
Best Wishes!!!
2012/8/9 Stefan Walter
> Am 09.08.2012 um 21:49 schrieb "BRM " <
> bm_witn...@yahoo.com>:
>
> >> From: Lorn Potter
> >
> >> To: Till Oliver Knoll
> >> Cc: Qt Project
> >> Sent: Thursday, Augu
Am 09.08.2012 um 21:49 schrieb "BRM "
:
>> From: Lorn Potter
>
>> To: Till Oliver Knoll
>> Cc: Qt Project
>> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 7:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
>>
>>
>> On 09/
] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
> From: Lorn Potter
> To: Till Oliver Knoll
> Cc: Qt Project
> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 7:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
>
>
> On 09/08/2012, at 6:49 PM, Till Oliver Knoll
> wrote:
>
>>
> From: Lorn Potter
> To: Till Oliver Knoll
> Cc: Qt Project
> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 7:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
>
>
> On 09/08/2012, at 6:49 PM, Till Oliver Knoll
> wrote:
>
>> Am 09.08.2012 um 08:31 s
Digia you have won respect of mine. I salute you. Best of luck.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:23 PM, d3fault wrote:
> Bricks = shat. Seriously, this is better than christmas.
> I love you Digia.
>
> Qt will quadruple in size once it's targetting Android/iOS (paying extra
> is the norm for Apple fans,
Bricks = shat. Seriously, this is better than christmas.
I love you Digia.
Qt will quadruple in size once it's targetting Android/iOS (paying extra is
the norm for Apple fans, so needing a commercial license to release on the
iOS app store will be shrugged off as just another expense).
d3fault
__
On 9 August 2012 12:52, Lorn Potter wrote:
> They are part of this. 3 tons of CI servers are heading north in the coming
> weeks/months.
Are Rohan and Jason in the crate too?
Rich.
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-proj
On Thursday 09 August 2012 13:52:55 Lorn Potter wrote:
> On 09/08/2012, at 7:00 PM, "R. Reucher" wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 August 2012 10:49:49 Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> > > Hooray! The spirit of Trolltech is back :)
> >
> > Yeah, really sounds as if :)!
> >
> > I'm very pleased to read all thi
On 09/08/2012, at 6:49 PM, Till Oliver Knoll
wrote:
> Am 09.08.2012 um 08:31 schrieb Eric Landuyt :
>
>> Hello ,
>>
>> seems like a very good news:
>>
>> http://www.digia.com/en/Home/Company/News/Digia-to-acquire-Qt-from-Nokia/
>
> "Digia plans to quickly enable Qt on Android, iOS and Windo
On 09/08/2012, at 7:00 PM, "R. Reucher" wrote:
> On Thursday 09 August 2012 10:49:49 Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> > Hooray! The spirit of Trolltech is back :)
> Yeah, really sounds as if :)!
>
> I'm very pleased to read all this.
>
> Good luck, Digia, with this great decision! Still hoping that
Eric Landuyt
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 2:31 AM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Cc: developm...@qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
Hello ,
seems like a very good news:
http://www.digia.com/en/Home/Company/News/Digia-to-acquire-Qt-from-Nokia/
--
Eric Landuy
Op 9-8-2012 13:39, gemfield schreef:
> Will Digia hold Qt Developer Days 2012 ?
ICS and KDAB are already organizing this year.
André
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
Make sure to make Qt desktop components very /high/ priority. The Qt
meetup I organized in Tel Aviv 2 days ago really cried out the need
for that.
-Sivan
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Till Oliver Knoll
wrote:
> Am 09.08.2012 um 08:31 schrieb Eric Landuyt :
>
>> Hello ,
>>
>> seems like a very
Will Digia hold Qt Developer Days 2012 ?
在2012-08-09，Ramakanthreddy_Kesireddy
写道:-原始邮件-
发件人: Ramakanthreddy_Kesireddy
发送时间: 2012年8月9日 星期四
收件人: "R. Reucher" , "interest@qt-project.org"
主题: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
I think Qt will beco
Op 9-8-2012 10:42, Thiago Macieira schreef:
> On quinta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2012 11.24.37, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Thiago Macieira
>>
>> wrote:
>>> It's too bad that they couldn't take over the Brisbane operations too. I
>>> guess it's more of a logistical issu
+ramakanthreddy_kesireddy=mahindrasatyam@qt-project.org]
On Behalf Of R. Reucher
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 2:30 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
On Thursday 09 August 2012 10:49:49 Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> Hooray! The spirit of Trollt
On Thursday 09 August 2012 10:49:49 Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> Hooray! The spirit of Trolltech is back :)
Yeah, really sounds as if :)!
I'm very pleased to read all this.
Good luck, Digia, with this great decision! Still hoping that the Brisbane
operations will somehow be part of this... though
Am 09.08.2012 um 08:31 schrieb Eric Landuyt :
> Hello ,
>
> seems like a very good news:
>
> http://www.digia.com/en/Home/Company/News/Digia-to-acquire-Qt-from-Nokia/
"Digia plans to quickly enable Qt on Android, iOS and Windows 8 platforms."
and (for me) most important:
"Digia’s targeted R&D
On quinta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2012 11.24.37, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Thiago Macieira
>
> wrote:
> > It's too bad that they couldn't take over the Brisbane operations too. I
> > guess it's more of a logistical issue.
>
> I think that actually depends on the devel
I guess this will clear out the following days, I'm also very
interested (as I was very close to that in community and not)
documentation- if they also adopt the doc people in Nokia documenting
Qt.
-Sivan
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:18 AM, wrote:
>> Hi, From Digia: "...As part of the transaction
> Hi, From Digia: "...As part of the transaction, a maximum of 125 Qt
> people from Nokia will transfer to Digia,..." How many "Qt people
> from Nokia" exist?
Might be mean, but the correct questions is: How many Qt _developers_
from Nokia exist? Qt related business and support people are not un
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
>
> It's too bad that they couldn't take over the Brisbane operations too. I guess
> it's more of a logistical issue.
>
I think that actually depends on the development focus- perhaps if
Digia are going to continue support Qt on mobiles (whi
On quinta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2012 09.09.51, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
> From Digia:
> "...As part of the transaction, a maximum of 125 Qt people from Nokia
> will transfer to Digia,..."
> How many "Qt people from Nokia" exist?
I am *not* sure of actual numbers, so this is my personal estimatio
Yes, this question is quite interesting indeed, and also the
components of Qt that will still get funded development support as I
suspect Digia won't be able to maintain it all?
Let's hope for more good news after that, and a new dawn for our eco system.
-Sivan
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:09 AM, T
Hi,
From Digia:
"...As part of the transaction, a maximum of 125 Qt people from Nokia
will transfer to Digia,..."
How many "Qt people from Nokia" exist?
Thomas
Am 09.08.2012 08:31, schrieb Eric Landuyt:
> Hello ,
>
> seems like a very good news:
>
> http://www.digia.com/en/Home/Company/News/Di
Hello ,
seems like a very good news:
http://www.digia.com/en/Home/Company/News/Digia-to-acquire-Qt-from-Nokia/
--
Eric Landuyt, Developer - mailto:e...@datarescue.be
DataRescue sa/nv - http://www.datarescue.com
___
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-pr
83 matches
Mail list logo
