On 08/13/2012 03:14 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > So, in all, you*may* be right that giving a product under a freer licence > lowers its monetary value -- it's intuitive.
That is also debatable. For example, Red Hat manages to pull an annual revenue of around 1 billion dollars while giving away their product under a FLOSS license. I really doubt they could pull this off if they had based their business on a stack of proprietary software. After all, what's the monetary value of something that no one wants to spend money on? Rui Maciel _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
