On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:36 PM, BRM <bm_witn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Some may yes, but I think the general ambiguity left by the LGPL requirements > still pushes most towards commercial licenses.
IANAL but I'm not sure what ambiguity is there to the LGPL. It is probably just plain FUD working there. So effectively the commercial licensing of Qt is just like the commercial nature of Red Hat Linux -- you don't purchase a licence to use the software, you just purchase the support. No? -- Shriramana Sharma _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
