BRM:
> Qt didn't fail at Nokia.
And I never said it did. I simply said that Nokia
destroyed all (+/-) of their own investment in
Trolltech, perhaps as a result of driving Qt into
(further into?) FOSS territory.
Atlant
-----Original Message-----
From: BRM [mailto:bm_witn...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:04 AM
To: Atlant Schmidt; interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
> From: Atlant Schmidt <aschm...@dekaresearch.com>
> To: 'Bob Hood' <bho...@comcast.net>; "interest@qt-project.org"
> <interest@qt-project.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
>> Wait a sec... wasn't that because Nokia bought a highly valuable
>> toolkit, got a lot of testing and probably even bug fixes "for
>> free" from the community, had a gazillion of Qt developers just
>> waiting to unleash their creativity on Nokia phones... and then
>> decided NOT to use it by going Windows mobile exclusively? Wasn't
>> THAT the reason they failed with Qt?
>
> That's not exactly how it played out. By the time of Symbian^3,
> Qt was a standard feature of Nokia's Symbian phones. Anna and
> Belle also contained it as standard.
>
> And if I'm not mistaken, by that time, hadn't Nokia switched
> over to using a Qt-based Web browser on Symbian? How many of
> the software's other standard apps had been switched to Qt-
> based designs? (The plan certainly was to switch all of them,
> but I left Nokia before the changeover was accomplished.)
>
> Nokia didn't exactly throw away Qt without ever deploying it.
>
He didn't say they didn't deploy (though I could see how that was implied);
just that they committed to it as a strategy that was 100% compatible with what
they were doing before, only to then go quickly in a very different direction
that
was 100% compatible with any previous direction.
Qt didn't fail at Nokia.
Nokia failed to utilize Qt and stick with a strategy long enough to see it
through to sucess.
Nokia's failure in that regard is their own, and purely a business one that has
no link to how Qt is licensed (other than possible political ones for Elop, but
that's neither
here nor there).
Ben
This e-mail and the information, including any attachments, it contains are
intended to be a confidential communication only to the person or entity to
whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.
Thank you.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
