On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:52:07AM +0300, coroberti . wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Tomasz Siekierda wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
> >> > It might be a minor point, but I think it would
Filed as https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-70272
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM
> From: "Cédric CARRÉE"
> To: interest@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names
>
> On 30/08/2018 09:14, Tomasz Siekierda wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pö
my 2 cents, what I do is I make a basic QObject singleton, which provide
signal, anything can hook to the signal and everybody can easily fire the
signal.
QObjectSingleton::showHelpDialog() could be send from anywhere by any code
and I can then make my Widget change it's visibility based on this
On 30/08/2018 09:14, Tomasz Siekierda wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform
kit name structure.
+1
I'd also suggest keeping these names as
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 04:28, Jason H wrote:
>
> It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform
> kit name structure.
>
> I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like
> Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop
> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS
> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS Simulator
>
> Instead I currently
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:28 PM Jason H wrote:
>
> I'd like it to be Qt / Version / Platform like
> Qt 5.10.1 for Desktop
> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS
> Qt 5.10.1 for iOS Simulator
+1, and while at it, replace "Desktop" with a platform name too.
--
J-P Nurmi
__
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Tomasz Siekierda wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
>> > It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more
>> > uniform kit name structure.
>>
>
> +1
>
> I'
Am 30.08.18 um 09:14 schrieb Tomasz Siekierda:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
>>> It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more
>>> uniform kit name structure.
> +1
>
> I'd also suggest keeping
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
> > It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more
> > uniform kit name structure.
>
+1
I'd also suggest keeping these names as consise as possible. For
example,
