Re: [Interest] Bounties?

On Friday 13 March 2015 23:08:38 Bernhard wrote: > > That's not true as such. Though having silver or gold support will > > hopefully > > > give the task an extra boost > > Do you mean bronze support helps for bug fixes? Support in general helps getting bugs fixed because support helps you narr

Re: [Interest] Do I need to build Qt from the source to have an app compile in 32 bit?

On Saturday 14 March 2015 00:12:39 Nuno Santos wrote: > Thanks for your detailed explanation. > > At the time I was reading this email, the Qt was already being built with > the option -no-c++11. Let see if it is sufficient. > > I’m currently running Xcode 6.2 on Mac OSX Yosemite 10.10.2 Please

Re: [Interest] Is it possible to translate the command line help&version description

I’ve tried installing a translator, it did work either, maybe it just loaded the wrong translation files. The second method is really straight forward, thanks Koehne ;) hualet @ Deepin Inc. mr.asianw...@gmail.com > 在 2015年3月14日，上午5:19，Koehne Kai 写道： > > >Like what I've asked in the title,

Re: [Interest] Do I need to build Qt from the source to have an app compile in 32 bit?

Nikos, Thanks for your detailed explanation. At the time I was reading this email, the Qt was already being built with the option -no-c++11. Let see if it is sufficient. I’m currently running Xcode 6.2 on Mac OSX Yosemite 10.10.2 Thanks, Regards, Nuno > On 13/03/2015, at 23:57, Nikos Chantz

Re: [Interest] Do I need to build Qt from the source to have an app compile in 32 bit?

On 14/03/15 01:16, Nuno Santos wrote: > Sorry Thiago, > > But what means targeting libstdc++? OS X 10.6 doesn't come with the new C++ library (libc++). It comes with an old one (libstdc++). They are not compatible with each other. Also, libstdc++ doesn't support C++11. Normally, you use the "-s

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

Den 13-03-2015 kl. 23:45 skrev Bernhard: >> I think it'll be a lot easier to convince the Qt Project JIRA admins to > hack on a >> bounty system if there's some precedence that the system actually works :) > > Sounds like a chicken-and-egg problem... I am pretty sure this will not work > without se

Re: [Interest] Do I need to build Qt from the source to have an app compile in 32 bit?

Sorry Thiago, But what means targeting libstdc++? Regards, Nuno > On 13/03/2015, at 19:46, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Friday 13 March 2015 18:45:54 Nuno Santos wrote: >> I wanted to build in 32 bit because someone was telling me that the app was >> crashing on a 32 bit snow leopard mac. >

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> I think it'll be a lot easier to convince the Qt Project JIRA admins to hack on a > bounty system if there's some precedence that the system actually works :) Sounds like a chicken-and-egg problem... I am pretty sure this will not work without seamless JIRA integration. -- Kind Regards Bernhar

Re: [Interest] building QtWebEngine on 32bit OS X or with -spec macx-clang-32, possible?

On Friday March 13 2015 12:48:06 Thiago Macieira wrote: > No. The arguments are stored in the Makefile itself. Well, so then that cannot explain the issues I'm seeing. I'm starting without a Makefile. R. ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.o

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> > Some support guy told me that priority bug fixing comes with > > enterprise license (Silver support). (Still I did not get any response > > from the CC-ed sales person about the costs but surely they are > > significant) > > That's not true as such. Though having silver or gold support will ho

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

On 13/03/15 23:11, Preet wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Guido Seifert > wrote: > > What compiler do you use? Do you ask the same questions when you > compile your code with the gcc? Or visual studio? > > Guido > > > No, but when you use a compiler dire

Re: [Interest] QtCreator with very high resolution laptops

On Friday 13 March 2015, Etienne Sandré-Chardonnal wrote: > Hi, > > I just got a 1920x1080 14" laptop, this fairly high but not huge DPI. I > have set the Windows 7 scaling to 125% which is small but OK. > I migrated my Qt4 app to Qt 5.4.1 (at last...) and use the fusion style. > > With the defau

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

On Friday 13 March 2015 17:11:36 Preet wrote: > No, but when you use a compiler directly there's usually no stage where > interim code is added to the output if you don't explicitly specify it. I > realize that qmake ends up calling these compilers at the end anyways, but > I thought there might be

Re: [Interest] Is it possible to translate the command line help&version description

>Like what I've asked in the title, is it possible? >I've tried calling setDescription on the CommandLineOption returned by >>addHelpOption, >but with no luck. I need some help here, thanks. I understand you want to translate the "Displays this help." text? The text is translated via tr() , so

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Guido Seifert wrote: > What compiler do you use? Do you ask the same questions when you compile > your code with the gcc? Or visual studio? > > Guido > No, but when you use a compiler directly there's usually no stage where interim code is added to the output if

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

>> Still, I remain skeptical for a money-based bounty system for Qt. I'm not >> aware of any project successfully implementing such a bounty system, >> although the idea pops up since years [1]. Also, my best guess is that most >> people contributing to Qt are either employed to do this, or have ot

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

On Friday 13 March 2015 14:42:22 Preet wrote: > Hi, > > I tend to use QtCreator and qmake for all of my projects, even those that > don't use Qt. Something I haven't really considered is how the usage of > qmake might affect what I build with it from a licensing stand point. > > qmake uses mkspec

Re: [Interest] building QtWebEngine on 32bit OS X or with -spec macx-clang-32, possible?

On Friday 13 March 2015 17:58:51 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Friday March 13 2015 09:45:08 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > qmake stores the arguments you gave it on the command-line and will always > > That's what the -nocache argument is supposed to prevent, I presume? FWIW, > using that argument thr

Re: [Interest] Do I need to build Qt from the source to have an app compile in 32 bit?

On Friday 13 March 2015 18:45:54 Nuno Santos wrote: > I wanted to build in 32 bit because someone was telling me that the app was > crashing on a 32 bit snow leopard mac. [cut] > Library not loaded: /usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib > Referenced from: > /Applications/LKBRIDGE.app/Contents/MacOS/../Framew

Re: [Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

What compiler do you use? Do you ask the same questions when you compile your code with the gcc? Or visual studio? Guido > Hi, > > I tend to use QtCreator and qmake for all of my projects, even those that > don't use Qt. Something I haven't really considered is how the usage of > qmake might af

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> > Regarding $174 for a professional license... for a startup this IS a > > significant amount of money. Also I have doubts about effectivity of > > Bronze support level regarding bug fixes. > > Alright, I didn't want to be rude. Sure there are people for which $174 is a lot > of money, and I app

Re: [Interest] Do I need to build Qt from the source to have an app compile in 32 bit?

Hi, I wanted to build in 32 bit because someone was telling me that the app was crashing on a 32 bit snow leopard mac. I thought this was the problem, however, today, after sending a new build in 32 bit the problem remains. The crash log is below. Can someone understand exactly why is it cras

[Interest] Qt licensing and using qmake for non-Qt projects

Hi, I tend to use QtCreator and qmake for all of my projects, even those that don't use Qt. Something I haven't really considered is how the usage of qmake might affect what I build with it from a licensing stand point. qmake uses mkspecs, and (possibly?) other files from the qt source tree. On c

Re: [Interest] building QtWebEngine on 32bit OS X or with -spec macx-clang-32, possible?

On Friday March 13 2015 09:45:08 Thiago Macieira wrote: > qmake stores the arguments you gave it on the command-line and will always That's what the -nocache argument is supposed to prevent, I presume? FWIW, using that argument throws an error when doing `qmake qtwebengine.pro` > However, if y

Re: [Interest] building QtWebEngine on 32bit OS X or with -spec macx-clang-32, possible?

On Friday 13 March 2015 17:40:10 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > But that just exposes another issue. The gyp generator insists on adding a > -Dtarget_arch=x64 option, but in the end the ninja.build file is the only > one that is configured correctly for building 32bit on a 64bit platform. > Apparently I

Re: [Interest] QtCreator with very high resolution laptops

Hi, I just got a 1920x1080 14" laptop, this fairly high but not huge DPI. I have set the Windows 7 scaling to 125% which is small but OK. I migrated my Qt4 app to Qt 5.4.1 (at last...) and use the fusion style. With the default settings, it seems the app is not DPI aware : everything is very smal

Re: [Interest] building QtWebEngine on 32bit OS X or with -spec macx-clang-32, possible?

On Friday March 13 2015 09:14:32 Thiago Macieira wrote: Hi, > > The isPlatformSupported test for QtWebEngine has the following line > > > > linux-g++*|win32-msvc2013|macx-clang: return(true) > > > > which means that the test fails for the mkspec macx-clang-32 . Does that > > mean the componen

Re: [Interest] building QtWebEngine on 32bit OS X or with -spec macx-clang-32, possible?

On Friday 13 March 2015 11:09:17 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > The isPlatformSupported test for QtWebEngine has the following line > > linux-g++*|win32-msvc2013|macx-clang: return(true) > > which means that the test fails for the mkspec macx-clang-32 . Does that > mean the component cannot

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> > -Original Message- > > [...] > > > Sorry, but I can't help to think that, if that is too expensive for > > > your business, the money you'd dedicate to a bug bounty would be > > > pocket money, too. And > > > > Some support guy told me that priority bug fixing comes with enterprise > >

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> -Original Message- > [...] > > Sorry, but I can't help to think that, if that is too expensive for > > your business, the money you'd dedicate to a bug bounty would be > > pocket money, too. And > > Some support guy told me that priority bug fixing comes with enterprise > license (Silver

Re: [Interest] QSplitter and resizing QGraphicsView problem

On 03/12/2015 09:25 PM, Andrej Kacian wrote: > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:38:06 +0100 > David Heremans wrote: > >> If the panels could be made to only resize when a users drags the >> splitter handles around this would probably solve my problem, but I >> don't seem to find such an option in the docume

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

>> Which bug is that? >https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-321 >Technically it is a suggestion. But from a more realistic point of view it >is a bug. And now there is https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/108494/ I will hurry to get the silver label to my sharedmemory bug fast ;-) Regards,

[Interest] Font is not drawn in case of am335x TI board( touch screen 640X480)

Hi, The Text is clear and perfectly displayed for Desktop Qt application, but in case of embedded board (having touch screen: 640X480) it's quite improper, it seems background is not transparent. Could anyone will guide me to get the font displayed properly for embedded board too. Best Rega

[Interest] Regarding touch sensitivity of am335x TI board

Hi, kinetic scrolling and swipe is working fine for desktop Qt application , but if i run the same application on am335x board( touch screen :640X480), it shows strange behavior. The velocity of scrolling is quite strange. I have implemented qt-labs-kineticscroller application. Could you pl

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> > BTW... the 8 years old issue I mentioned has the tag > "Reported_by_support_silver" and is not a complex beast and still it isn't > implemented after 8 years. So obviously paying for a license (even enterprise > level) is not a guarantee to get problems solved. > > Which bug is that? https://

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

On 13 Mar 2015, at 11:12, Bernhard wrote: > BTW... the 8 years old issue I mentioned has the tag > "Reported_by_support_silver" and is not a complex beast and still it isn't > implemented after 8 years. So obviously paying for a license (even enterprise > level) is not a guarantee to get prob

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> > Well, those sites where not bound to a project. I think it makes a big > > difference if such a bounty service is directly attached to (and maybe > > controlled by) Digia. I experienced big difference in acceptance > > between "yet another" service and the "official" service. > > bugreports.qt

[Interest] building QtWebEngine on 32bit OS X or with -spec macx-clang-32, possible?

Hi, The isPlatformSupported test for QtWebEngine has the following line linux-g++*|win32-msvc2013|macx-clang: return(true) which means that the test fails for the mkspec macx-clang-32 . Does that mean the component cannot be built on 32bit OS X, and if so, how come the test appears like it w

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

Koehne Kai schreef op 13-3-2015 om 10:35: > >> -Original Message- >> From: interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org >> [mailto:interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] >> On Behalf Of Bernhard >> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:14 AM >> To: interest@qt

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

On Friday March 13 2015 09:35:55 Koehne Kai wrote: >A commercial license starts as low as $25 per month (mobile), and $174 per >month (professional). > >Sorry, but I can't help to think that, if that is too expensive for your >business, the money you'd dedicate to a bug bounty would be pocket mo

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> -Original Message- > From: interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org > [mailto:interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Bernhard > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:14 AM > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] Bounties?

[Interest] Is it possible to translate the command line help&version description

Like what I've asked in the title, is it possible? I've tried calling setDescription on the CommandLineOption returned by addHelpOption, but with no luck. I need some help here, thanks. -- -- Hualet ___ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

A slightly other thought. I think Digia could also put out bounties on successful bug fixes. For them it could even be relatively cheap if they 'pay' in commercial licenses. IMHO a win/ win situation: For the bug fixer, who gets the commercial license, this bounty has a considerable value. And i

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> -Original Message- > From: interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org > [mailto:interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Andre Somers > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:01 AM > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] Bount

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only successful bounty systems I'm aware of > are for finding (security related) bugs, not fixing bugs or developing features. Well, those sites where not bound to a project. I think it makes a big difference if such a bounty service is directly attached to (and

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

Koehne Kai schreef op 13-3-2015 om 09:40: > That said, I agree that the current 'voting' system in JIRA is of > somewhat limited use. Quite naturally, annoyances that a lot of people > hit (and that are easy to search for) are up-voted, while other, more > serious issues that however affect only

Re: [Interest] Qt Purchasing API - In app purchasing iOS not working on a release version deployed to the store.

Hi, I just wanted to share with you that the problem is gone. In-apps are working. It was probably, a simple propagation time issue. Harri, do you confirm the same for your app? Glad to know that it is not an hidden issue! Regards, Nuno > On 12/03/2015, at 13:17, Nuno Santos wrote: > > Ha

Re: [Interest] [OT] Re: Bounties?

On Friday March 13 2015 09:29:22 Alejandro Exojo wrote: >> > I'm beginning to understand why it costs a flat-rate small fortune to >> > have even a trivial bug solved and committed by KDab... > >A trivial bug doesn't cost a fortune. A trivial bug can be fixed by anyone on The kdab page someone l

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

> -Original Message- > From: interest-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org > [...] > In fact this thread was intended to talk about Bounties. Not for complaining. > Do you see a chance for bug tracker integrated bounties? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the only successful bount

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

El Thursday 12 March 2015, Thiago Macieira escribió: > On Thursday 12 March 2015 10:31:56 Bo Thorsen wrote: > > No. Viking Software is a Qt consulting company. I have 18 years of Qt > > coding experience. Support is not required > > In other words, Bo has more experience with Qt than I do. And si

Re: [Interest] [OT] Re: Bounties?

El Friday 13 March 2015, Till Oliver Knoll escribió: > > Am 12.03.2015 um 23:46 schrieb René J.V. Bertin : > > > > On Thursday March 12 2015 14:32:00 Thiago Macieira wrote: > >>> It has 3 Votes and 4 watches. I provided a patch as attachment, 2 years > >>> ago, nothing happened. > >> > >> We have

Re: [Interest] Bounties?

Till Oliver Knoll schreef op 12-3-2015 om 17:52: >> Am 12.03.2015 um 14:57 schrieb maitai : >> >> If an app needs to be qml for mobile and qwidgets for PCs, then the >> whole concept of portability is broken. > Uhm... why? The UI layer - in the best case - is just a small part of the > application

Re: [Interest] Installing on a headless server

> -Original Message- > From: interest-bounces+tero.kojo=theqtcompany@qt-project.org > [mailto:interest-bounces+tero.kojo=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Jason H > Sent: 12. maaliskuuta 2015 21:55 > To: Thiago Macieira > Cc: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interes

[Interest] [OT] Re: Bounties?

> Am 12.03.2015 um 23:46 schrieb René J.V. Bertin : > > On Thursday March 12 2015 14:32:00 Thiago Macieira wrote: > >>> It has 3 Votes and 4 watches. I provided a patch as attachment, 2 years ago, >>> nothing happened. >> >> We have to ignore patches as attachments to bug reports if they are no