Till Oliver Knoll schreef op 12-3-2015 om 17:52: >> Am 12.03.2015 um 14:57 schrieb maitai <mai...@virtual-winds.org>: >> >> If an app needs to be qml for mobile and qwidgets for PCs, then the >> whole concept of portability is broken. > Uhm... why? The UI layer - in the best case - is just a small part of the > application and the entire business logic should be independent. UI just a small part? Seriously? For a trivial application perhaps, or if you really can stick to using a bunch of standard components and be done with it. In my experience, if you want to make a good interface, that is not where the work stops. There is very, versy significant effort in a good user interface.
> So having QML on mobile devices and Qt Widgets on desktops for me is not a > point against "portability". > > Qt offers so much more "non-UI" functionality these days which is > cross-platform. So providing a complete (maybe "simplified") UI paradigm on a > mobile platform, but which accesses the same (cross-platform) model is not a > contradiction. > > In fact I always get suspicious when people claim to have the same UI (even > same code basis "with a few #ifdefs"!) on both desktop and mobile platforms: > either it is a trivial application, or it "just does not feel right" on one > platform. > That though, _is_ true. Different platforms require a different UI. Which amounts to more of the work I already pointed out above. André _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
