> > Well, those sites where not bound to a project. I think it makes a big > > difference if such a bounty service is directly attached to (and maybe > > controlled by) Digia. I experienced big difference in acceptance > > between "yet another" service and the "official" service. > > bugreports.qt-project.org is not limited to The Qt Company.
Of course. Still it is the one and only official bug tracker. Isn't it? > A commercial license starts as low as $25 per month (mobile), and $174 per > month (professional). > > Sorry, but I can't help to think that, if that is too expensive for your business, > the money you'd dedicate to a bug bounty would be pocket money, too. And Some support guy told me that priority bug fixing comes with enterprise license (Silver support). (Still I did not get any response from the CC-ed sales person about the costs but surely they are significant) Regarding $174 for a professional license... for a startup this IS a significant amount of money. Also I have doubts about effectivity of Bronze support level regarding bug fixes. BTW... the 8 years old issue I mentioned has the tag "Reported_by_support_silver" and is not a complex beast and still it isn't implemented after 8 years. So obviously paying for a license (even enterprise level) is not a guarantee to get problems solved. > > As you said the current votes are pretty much worthless. But maybe > > such "super-votes" aka bounties could be more useful. Actually I can't > > see much harm in trying it. > > Whenever actual money has to be transferred world-wide it IMO will be > considerable effort. This is no problem using Paypal. There are many internet businesses out there doing this all day. -- Kind Regards Bernhard Lindner
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
