> On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 12:23:56 +0100,
> Patrick Gaherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (pg) writes:
pg> I'm having problems getting sieve and postifx to play nicely
pg> together. I'm using cyrus-imapd-2.0.14 and postfix-20010202. From
pg> reading around it would seem to be a problem with lmtp, but I
Sendmail can do LMTP delivery. You'll have to ask a Sendmail user
(it's been a while for me) for details
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 14:56:23 +0200 ,
> Stefano Coatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sc) writes:
sc> Sigh, I can't install Postfix in place of sendmail so I've to abandon the
sc> feature
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2001 20:45:22 -0400,
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> I took a look at this and it IS doable (I actually hacked some code),
km> but it makes the LIST/LSUB code uglier than it already is. For this
km> reason, and the fact that Larry and I both feel tha
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:49:54 +0200,
> tarjei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (t) writes:
t> I think this is is an issue user and group issues:
t> make sure cyrus is compiled with the --user = cyrus and --group = mail options also,
t> make sure bot postfix and cyrus is memeber of the mail group.
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 18:16:34 GMT,
> goldcst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (g) writes:
g>May 6 10:26:58 tifa postfix/pipe[8634]:
g> fatal: request to use mail system owner group id 12
This is your clue. The docs for Cyrus say to install with group
"mail". Generally I just create anot
lmtpd.c (2.0.14):
/* ok, is auth_identity an admin?
* for now only admins can do lmtp from another machine
*/
Why's that? So the auth that's presented to lmtpd can't be used for
posting access via the ACL's?
--
Amos
Postfix does not care to allow other programs to work in it's
user/group space. To avoid this, when I compile Cyrus I just do:
./configure --with-cyrus-user=cyrus --with-cyrus-group=cyrus
Alternatively, you can fiddle with the user=cyrus:mail setting in
master.cf, but I forget which w
Well, I know Tcl isn't as popular, but we sure didn't see these
kinds of errors before. :-P
I know, what about a Ruby extension? Combined with readline
support, that would make a pretty darn convenient interactive
utility. :-P
--
Amos
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:46:51 -0700,
> Derek Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ds) writes:
ds> Ok, to be more exact:
ds> Solaris 7 (sparc)
ds> cyrus 2.0.14
ds> cyrus-sasl 1.5.24
ds> Berkeley DB 3.2.9
ds> Postfix 20010228-pl03
I don't know if it would help or not, but you do have this box ful
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 08:44:21 +0200,
> Christoph Krempe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ck) writes:
ck> I did so, too.
ck> The error is not "permission denied", but
ck> "unable to open Berkeley db /etc/sasldb: Invalid argument".
I'm by no means a Berkeley db expert, but I have noticed that often
t
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:25:08 -,
> Nico Weichbrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nw) writes:
nw> Why is there no from address (I set the servername: in /etc/imapd.conf) and
The message is formated as a bounce.
nw> what mean insufficient privileges to change uid, and why cyrus want to use
nw>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:06:32 +0400,
> Pavel Levshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (pl) writes:
pl> Then, some servers on the Net do not accept those mails. I've got this
pl> error from remote MTA (IMail 5.05):
MAIL From:<> SIZE=726
pl> <<< 501 bogus mail from
pl> Which RFC states this beha
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:13:20 -0400,
> Chris Audley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ca) writes:
ca> Why is this? None of the MTAs I've tested are case sensitive in the
ca> local-part
ca> of the address. I regularly recieve mail to my account in a mix of cases
ca> and it
ca> comes through fine.
I
Does this new Berk DB offer significant improvements for Cyrus?
Anything with this release that Cyrus will be able to take advantage
of at some point?
--
Amos
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 09:03:16 -,
> Nico Weichbrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nw) writes:
nw> Hi,
nw> is there any way to format the message-body so i can use paragraphs in my
nw> vacation reply text. Unix syntax like '\n' do not work. The entire text is in
nw> only one line of the reply me
On a Solaris 8 box I notice that the user's password is echoed when
using sieveshell.
Also, when quickly browsing through this script, I notice the use of
$acapserver. Does that mean ACAP must be install and running before
sieveshell can be used?
--
Amos
km> Hmm. Can't help you on this one, some type of perlism.
Oh, I also noticed that sieveshell doesn't do STARTTLS like
installsieve did. Is that something that can be enabled? Or
perhaps that hasn't been implemented yet?
--
Amos
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 10:36:43 -0700,
> Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ns) writes:
ns> Is there no way for the sieve to match on lines in the body? This
ns> would be the next extension I would like to see.
But this would not be global. Seems to me it would be much better
to have the MT
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 00:12:49 +0200,
> Terje Elde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (te) writes:
te> Also let me note that there seem to be a limitation in postfix. You can't
te> remap a + expanded username in the virtual file, which is fair enough I
How do you mean?
--
Amos
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 18:06:18 -0500,
> Mobeen Azhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ma) writes:
ma> procmail does not do lmtp delivery and I could not get cyrus' deliver to
You might want to visit http://www.procmail.org.
--
Amos
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 19:12:58 -0500,
> Mobeen Azhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ma) writes:
ma> also says that it is not enabled by default and I cannot find any
ma> mention of it in the man pages or the docs/readmes that came with the
Need to edit config.h.
--
Amos
ion is turned on in config.h?
ma> --Moby
ma> -Original Message-
ma> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ma> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Amos Gouaux
ma> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 22:19 PM
ma> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ma> Subject: Re: Sendmail -> Procmail -> Deliver
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 15:43:15 +0200,
> Terje Elde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (te) writes:
te> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I've got a whole ton of these in our virtual maps and they
work just peachy. You might want to double check that '+' is the
'recipient_de
In that case, why not take a look at the internal filtering
capabilities of Sendmail (milter?).
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 09:32:12 -0500,
> Mobeen Azhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ma) writes:
ma> I was getting the same feeling. I am using sieve for per user filtering
ma> right now, but I need a me
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:51:29 +0400 (MSD),
> Konstantin Kunshchikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kk) writes:
cyradm> cm test
>From our experience, you also have to have at least the `lr' ACLs on
that "test" folder as well. Its mere existence is not sufficient.
kk> Since OE exists one should fi
> On Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:44:07 -0700,
> David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (dw) writes:
dw> Does ANYONE have the following configuration working?
dw> cyrus-imapd-2.0.x authenticating via LDAP using sasl_pwcheck_method:
dw> PAM and the pam_ldap module
On a test Solaris 8 box I've got recent
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:40:36 -0400 (EDT),
> Alex Pilosov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ap) writes:
ap> Don't get me wrong. I love cyrus. Its been working (1.5.19) without a
ap> hitch for 2 years supporting 3000 mailboxes or so. But, LDAP and PAM are a
ap> cause for serious headache, and I'd recom
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2001 11:15:55 -0400,
> Paul Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (pg) writes:
pg> Aug 6 10:41:42 mailhub.acsu.buffalo.edu imapd[25973]: DBERROR db3: 2793 lockers
pg> Aug 6 10:56:41 mailhub.acsu.buffalo.edu imapd[10690]: DBERROR db3: 2794 lockers
pg> Aug 6 11:10:03 mailhub.acsu.bu
I don't know if it would even relate at all, but I noticed on the
openssl list some comments about /dev/random blocking. I got the
impression that using prngd might actually be better(?) faster(?)
than using /dev/random on some systems. Openssl 0.9.7 when released
will even be able to automatica
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 02:11:28 -0700,
> David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (dw) writes:
dw> The pwcheck distributed with cyrus-sasl is not useful to me. My
dw> users are not in /etc/passwd -- they are ONLY in an LDAP
Configure your name switch so that getpwnam/getspnam lookups go out
throu
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:37:34 +0200,
> Björn Törnqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (bt) writes:
bt> Hi, I have postfix -> cyris-imap setup on the same computer.
bt> When I mail a user on the host (echo hello | mail bt) postfix displays this in
it's log:
bt> Aug 8 16:28:40 managerzone postfix/q
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 08:40:58 -0500,
> Tyrone Vaughn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (tv) writes:
tv> I have done six implementations of Cyrus (2.0.11 - 2.0.16) and in each
tv> one I have the same problem. No user, other than cyrus, can
tv> authenticate unless I make the shadow file 444 verses it o
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:49:11 +1000,
> Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jh) writes:
jh> I think it would add lots. Not just for a documentation project, but for the
jh> whole Cyrus project. It would make it more of a community project rather
jh> than a CMU project, which means more peo
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 09:04:17 -0400,
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> themselves with :^) Amos' idea has consistent, expected results, where
km> full regex could do some wacky stuff depending on what the user types.
Well, to be honest I was being semi-smartass. I
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 16:19:20 +0200,
> Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (th) writes:
th> Hi All.
th> Pardon me, but new cyradm?
th> I this a new cyradm for 2.0x? or +??
2.x (actually a recent CVS pull of cyrus-imapd). In 1.x the cyradm
interactive utility was a Tcl extension. With 2
Are these nothing to worry much about?
DBERROR: error closing: DB_INCOMPLETE: Cache flush was unable to complete
DBERROR: error closing mailboxes: cyrusdb error
They sound kind ominous. At least things seem to be chugging along.
--
Amos
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:35:18 +0100,
> Cillian Sharkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cs) writes:
cs> One thing that wouldn't go amiss would be readline support, if it's installed.
cs> I imagine it'd be easy enough to add in.
Oh it's already there, with the appropriate perl modules installed.
I b
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2001 10:38:57 -0500,
>>>>> Amos Gouaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ag) writes:
ag> Has anybody installed a Verisign cert for SSL/TLS? Is this
ag> possible? We're planning on doing this so that there aren't client
ag> h
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:23:26 -0400,
> Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lg) writes:
lg> openssl x509 -in -hash
lg> At the top of the output, you'll see something like:
lg> d6e6472d
lg> Link "d6e6472d.0" to the actual cert file.
If I do this instead of using tls_ca_file, using
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2001 21:51:33 -0700,
> David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (dw) writes:
dw> Cyrus-imapd (1.6.24) insists on advertising AUTH=CRAM-MD5, even
dw> though this is a lie. This is (I think) one of the (many bad)
dw> side-effects of SASL -- because of SASL cyrus advertises this AUT
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 01:09:04 -0400,
> Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lg) writes:
lg> I don't know why SSL_connect is failing. You have TLS working for you
lg> with a self-signed certificate?
I'll give that a try tomorrow.
--
Amos
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:43:42 -0500 (CDT),
> mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (m) writes:
m> I'm using sendmail-8.12.0.Beta16 with cyrus-imapd-2.0.16.
m> Every time sendmail delivers a message to the LMTP daemon, it
m> logs an error message like this:
m> Aug 23 15:29:59 setup16 sm-mta[331]: [
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:22:16 +0200,
> Atif Ghaffar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ag) writes:
ag> I prefer the first one, but it has one drawback.
ag> Vacation replies will be sent to group addresses , example info@company,
ag> sales@company etc.
If it's a mailing list done with relatively ratio
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:12:37 -0400,
> Benjamin Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (bb) writes:
bb> I started setting up Cyrus IMAP server a few weeks ago and I had
bb> to take a break to setup a several NIS+ domains. Now the
bb> machine that I am planning on being the IMAP server is a NIS+
bb>
Has anybody gotten imspd to work via stunnel? Without it can
connect just fine. With it, get server identifier string, but then
it hangs and doesn't respond to input
--
Amos
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2001 19:07:28 -0400,
> Michael T Bacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (mtb) writes:
mtb> correctly, try "openssl s_client -crlf -connect
mtb> imsp.somewhere.com:imsps" or whatever. If you're not using openssl to
mtb> test it, chances are you're running into the same CR/LF problem,
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:31:49 +0200 (CEST),
> Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (th) writes:
th> - cyrus-imapd-2.0.16 doesn't set process ids correctly;
th> it only sets uid, not gid, neither supplementary gids
th> - detected by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cheng-Jih Chen), when trying the
th> "
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:41:39 -0400,
> Christopher Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cw) writes:
cw> BTW, the "chgrp shadow" trick still works in 2.0.16 if you do a "chmod
cw> g+s /usr/cyrus/bin/imapd" after making sure that executable belongs to
cw> group shadow.
Seems to me the more permiss
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:29:17 -0400,
> Christopher Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cw) writes:
cw> The "shadow" method gives "shadow" privileges to a Cyrus daemon. The
cw> pwcheck method requires root privilege for the pwcheck daemon. I would
cw> suggest that there is a qualitative differenc
My thoughts are less ambitious. What I'd like is for the MTA to do
the spam/whatever filtering, and if the message was considered to be
spam, the MTA would just add a header to the message. If the user
wanted to, have some formula Sieve script that simply saves mail
containing that header into a
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:56:08 -0400,
> Christopher Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cw) writes:
cw> Thanks. Does it slow down retries in the case of unsuccessful attempts?
What about other SASL methods? Do they slow down and/or lock out
repeated guessing attacks? Don't know. I imagine addi
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 09:50:31 -0500,
> Avi Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (as) writes:
as> I built and installed the cyrus IMSP server and I was wondering what
as> do I have to do to be able to connect to it via SSL. Is there even
as> a way to do so?
Use stunnel (http://www.stunnel.org).
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:13:37 +0300 (EEST),
> Leena Heino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lh) writes:
lh> We have about 11000 users on our mailserver and the server seems to be
lh> running out of resources ie. it seems to slow down when a lot of users
lh> (ie. 500-1000 imapd process are running in
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 19:29:43 -0400,
> Cyrus Daboo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cd) writes:
cd> In an ideal world, ACAP, the successor protocol to IMSP, would be
cd> available, and that would deal with these types of issues. However,
cd> the ACAP effort is all but dead, leaving IMSP as the only
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:05:53 -0400,
> Nick Simicich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ns) writes:
ns> I did some searches in the archives. If there is anything similar,
ns> searching on Eudora and ssl or tls didn't find it. Eudora will not
ns> complete TLS negotiation with Cyrus.
Are you attempti
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 05:56:08 +0200,
> Szymon Juraszczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sj) writes:
sj> I spent a few days figuring out why this beast was crashing. And all
sj> because lots of people still are unaware of elementary secure programing
sj> issues, hence they make trivial mistakes su
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:22:27 +0200 ,
> Nick Ustinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nu) writes:
nu> And that's the place, where lmtpd freezes:
nu> Oct 1 14:27:09 satan lmtpd[5687]: duplicate_check:
nu> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> user.bforce 0
You should probably indicate what version of Cyrus
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 17:56:59 -0400 (EDT),
> Steven J Sobol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sjs) writes:
sjs> NOT ready to put exim on the production server. :) So, I need a way to
sjs> deliver from dev.nstc.com (my development box) to mail.nstc.com. Is LMTP
sjs> the way to go? If so, does 1.6.19 wo
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2001 23:24:30 -0700,
> Jurgen Botz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jb) writes:
jb> At one point in the past I used Netscape Messaging Server (now iPlanet)
jb> and it had this problem at versions less than 4.x. With a few hundred
jb> users, many of whom had mailboxes with a few thou
>From a CVS pull of just a couple of hours ago, when I try to use
'reconstruct -r' I always get:
-r: Mailbox does not exist
Could this be a result of:
altnamespace: yes
(Haven't altered default for unixhierarchysep.)
--
Amos
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:13:18 +0330,
> Fatemeh Taj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ft) writes:
ft> Cyrus 2.0.16 is installed and woks. But the problem is that it
ft> can't work when such configuration is in hosts.allow:
ft> All : Local
ft> pop3d: xxx.xxx.xxx.0/255.255.255.0
ft> imapd: xxx.xxx.xxx
> On 08 Nov 2001 18:22:35 +,
> Ian Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ic) writes:
ic> 8. Summary
ic> I think this is a good solution because:
ic> - No new concepts are introduced, it is rather a clarification of
ic> existing ones
ic> - Backwards compatibility is preserved
ic> - You get som
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 16:20:18 -0800,
> Neil Bortnak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nb) writes:
nb> I'm not planning on implementing this but could you run a single tier
nb> cluster of IMAP servers which share the same read-write storage on a SAN
nb> using GFS or GPFS as a shared filesystem? Can th
> On 05 Nov 2001 14:39:44 +,
> Ian Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ic) writes:
ic> I have quite a large number of shared/public folders to which mail is
ic> sent/posted directly using the [EMAIL PROTECTED] convention.
ic> I want to sieve mail sent to these folders (to remove spam and oth
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:02:59 -0500,
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> I don't really remember where we left off. I *think* that Ian's idea is
km> what we were talking about -- checking sieveusehomedir==false and if
km> postuser!="" using postuser as the owner of the
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:12:48 -,
> Ian Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ic) writes:
ic> Oh dear. I can see a whole new imap function coming on - ". SIEVE folder
ic> script"...
Actually, in one of my more perverse moments I actually wondered
about storing the sieve scripts in the same dire
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2001 17:22:08 -0500,
> Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lg) writes:
lg> The other thing to consider is how to keep the Cyrus black-box
lg> approach. Non-administrators should be able to modify these Sieve
lg> scripts and name them appropriately.
lg> Magic directo
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:29:53 -0500,
> Kiarna Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kb) writes:
kb> I have a E220 R my predessesor bought sitting in a box, I have
kb> to dig it out and see what it has for
Oh gee, if you've got that, crack open the box. I would imagine
that would be sufficient, eve
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:10:35 -,
> Ian Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ic) writes:
ic> Well, the mechanism/interface is there. Allow "activate" to apply to more
ic> than one script.
ic> One way would be to have a subdirectory called "default" with symlinks to
ic> all the active scripts i
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:59:34 -0500,
> Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (lg) writes:
lg> If we're going to worry about Sieve performance, we really should look
lg> into compiling scripts to a byte-code. Currently we run lex/yacc on a
lg> script on _every delivery_. This is pretty
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 11:13:25 -0500,
> Kiarna Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kb) writes:
kb> I think I have to use the E220r for its intend purpose..sigh...
kb> (How many production servers can one girl rebuild in a month?)
Well, at least you won't have to worry about an upgrade for a rather
> On 09 Nov 2001 16:48:43 +,
> Ian Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ic) writes:
ic> ... An alternative approach might be to implement the "redirect" feature
ic> in sieve. So that 'fileinto "some.folder"' wouldn't do any extra
It's already there. See RFC3028:
4.3. Action redirect
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 09:35:29 -0800 (PST),
> Nick Sayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ns) writes:
ns> It seems to me that this could be far more easily done by creating a pseudo-
ns> user. Have this user be the target of the alias and his sieve script will
ns> be run. That sieve script can have no
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:15:51 -0500,
> Richmond Dyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (rd) writes:
rd> I have Cyrus 2.0.9 and postfix running. everything is working fine, but
rd> I am trying to figure out how to set up mil aliases in it to forward an
rd> info user to me the system administrator. any
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:36:59 +0100,
> Terje Elde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (te) writes:
te> With the 1.6 series all I had to do was to call deliver such that it would
te> deliver a message to the correct folder. With the 2.x series there are
te> advantages to using lmtp for deliveries instea
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:46:18 +0100,
> Terje Elde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (te) writes:
te> Only limitation is that without sieve filtering I'm left without the ability
te> to properly filter mailing lists administered elsewhere which I subcribe to as
te> a regular user to archive for public
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 17:13:19 +1100,
> Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jh) writes:
jh> I'm sure we all understand the dangers of hacking at internal structures.
jh> There's also performance benefits associated with this. It's up to solution
jh> developers to decide whether that trade-
I haven't had much time to look into this myself but, from a fairly
recent CVS pull, I notice that one's password is echoed when using
sieveshell. Perhaps some of the logic in Cyrus::IMAP::authenticate
could be used?
I notice the sieveshell script has the following:
my $tmpfile = "/tmp/sieveshe
works with cyrus TLS/SSL
r> you say if I use alternate port it will work??
r> it will begin a TLS/SSL session on authentication mechanism??
r> thanks
r> Rick
r> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Amos Gouaux wrote:
>> >>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:05:53 -0400,
>> &
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:58:40 -0500,
> Kevin J Menard, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kjm) writes:
kjm> Or for virtual domains. If I want to give a domain 25 MB of mail storage,
kjm> and they make as many accounts as they want, but the total mail usage for
kjm> all those accounts can't go above 2
I've gotten a request at our site that I'm passing on to the list.
Any possibility that non-admin users might be able to edit another
user's Sieve scripts, as in:
sieveshell -u user1 -a user2 server
Perhaps user2 would be able to edit the Sieve script for user1 if
user2 had the "a" ACL on "us
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2001 13:37:43 +0300,
> Nikos Voutsinas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nv) writes:
nv> We would appreciate if any member of the list
nv> could provide us with a sort description of an
nv> already implemented example of SUN servers running
nv> cyrus imap that deals with ~30K or more
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:28:21 +0530,
> Devdas Bhagat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (db) writes:
db> Get postfix to authenticate itself to LMTP, or configure lmtpd to
db> accept mails without prior authentication (the second is easier).
Or you could include the '-a' option, but if you do be sure t
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:01:27 -0600,
>>>>> Amos Gouaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ag) writes:
ag> I've gotten a request at our site that I'm passing on to the list.
ag> Any possibility that non-admin users might be able to edit another
ag>
Looks like there's a new release for Berkeley DB
--
Amos
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:40:13 +1100,
> Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jh) writes:
jh> Any great new enhancements? Any experience using it with Cyrus and/or
jh> Postfix?
Not I. Not yet. However, I did notice...
+ Support for group commit, to speed up write-intensive
> On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 01:42:17 -0500,
> Vincent Stoessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (vs) writes:
vs> It sound like a very well designed change I will defintely be playing with this
vs> one, I am tired of creating users on the system for mail accts.
This saslauthd also has much better logging th
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:14:23 +0100,
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sj) writes:
sj> This was a interesting thread, and I was happy to see that at least
sj> one suggestion, Jawmail, supported WAP, but it caused my stock RedHat
sj> 7.1 Apache/PHP build to crash when I ran "install.
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:57:49 -0500 (EST),
> Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (rs) writes:
rs> I suspect that the user you are running as is not an admin in the cyrus
rs> configuration file. (e.g. if sieveshell isn't given an authentication
rs> name, it tries to authenticate as whatev
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 22:02:26 +1100,
> Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jh) writes:
jh> I just remembered something. IIRC, if you use a Unix socket rather than a
jh> TCP socket, LMTP doesn't make you authenticate. I dunno if you'll have to
jh> patch Net::LMTP to use a Unix socket--if s
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:19:33 +,
> Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cs) writes:
>> p.s I tried contacting cyrusoft a bunch of times but
cs> nobody got back to me.
cs> What a big surprise!!
cs> 3 of us have got the same help from silkymail lately..
I think IETF might have
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 12:59:51 -0500 (EST),
> Christopher Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cw) writes:
cw> folder-collections="My Alias" {imaphost}inbox.[]
If you use altnamespace, you can drop the "inbox." portion.
cw> Right now, Pine seems happy. But if I try to change to a different fol
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 08:43:28 -0800,
> Dan de Haan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ddh) writes:
>> In my experience netscape usually thinks that you meant Sent and not
>> INBOX.Sent and fixes your preferences but it works anyway
>> because it looks
>> for INBOX.Sent if Sent isn't found. What can
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 15:06:06 -0600,
> Connie S Fensky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (csf) writes:
csf> Jan 2 12:31:12 frank imapd[7168]: DBERROR: error closing: DB_INCOMPLETE:
csf> Cache flush
csf> was unable to complete
I don't think this is too terrible.
csf> Jan 2 12:31:12 frank imapd[7168]
You said you had to increase the number of processes per user.
Perhaps the stack size per user also needs increasing?
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:39:53 -0600,
> cfensky (c) writes:
c> Thanks for the input, but I've already checked that--we haven't used our
c> swap yet, and we rarely go ov
> On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 10:43:17 -0500,
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (km) writes:
km> I think that this is because the preformatted saslauthd.8 in the
km> distribution hasn't been updated from the saslauthd.mdoc source. If you
km> have the mdoc macros, just run:
km> nroff -mdoc sas
> On Sat, 05 Jan 2002 23:29:42 +0100,
> Jan Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jk) writes:
jk> the mail does not get delivered and the following line is appended to
jk> my /var/log/imapd.log:
jk> connect(/var/imap/socket/lmtp) failed: Permission denied
Unless told otherwise, Postfix runs c
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2002 13:00:46 +0100,
> Jan Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jk) writes:
jk> Are you sure? I called a script (as mailbox_command) from postfix
jk> that does the following:
jk>echo $LOGNAME > /tmp/foo
jk> After sending a mail, /tmp/foo contained the recipient's name an
> On Sun, 06 Jan 2002 13:31:32 +0100,
> Jan Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jk) writes:
jk> oops, I made some *stupid* mistake: during my tries to find the
jk> error, I put user jan into mail group (and forgot to remove it
Ah, that explains it.
jk> again), that's why he can deliver mail, no
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 03:13:17 -0700,
> Irwan Hadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ih) writes:
ih> Still the same although I already added those in Makefile.PL
I feel your pain. I'm having a horrible time with 2.1 out of CVS.
I think there are problems with cmulocal/sasl2.m4, but I haven't
narrowed
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo
