You said you had to increase the number of processes per user. Perhaps the stack size per user also needs increasing?
>>>>> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:39:53 -0600, >>>>> cfensky <PostMaster> (c) writes: c> Thanks for the input, but I've already checked that--we haven't used our c> swap yet, and we rarely go over 30% of our memory. We also seem to get a c> very high and narrow spike on load whenever one of these errors is being c> written (of course, that is hard to correlate, since my load graph doesn't c> have time on it), so maybe it is an I/O thing.
