>>>>> On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:51:29 +0400 (MSD),
>>>>> Konstantin Kunshchikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (kk) writes:
cyradm> cm test
>From our experience, you also have to have at least the `lr' ACLs on
that "test" folder as well. Its mere existence is not sufficient.
kk> Since OE exists one should fix its problems. I think that proper
Oh, did they release the source code for it? ;-)
kk> patch for AltNamespace would be simple to make(may be #ifdef OE?)
This seems to be the big difference between the old namespace and
the alt namespace.
1.6.25
. namespace
* NAMESPACE (("INBOX." ".")) (("user." ".")) (("" "."))
. OK Completed
. list "" "bb"
* LIST () "." bb
. OK Completed
. getacl "bb"
* ACL bb anyone lr
. OK Completed
2.0.15-HIERSEP-r2
. namespace
* NAMESPACE (("" ".")) (("Other_Users." ".")) (("Shared_Folders." "."))
. OK Completed
. list "" "Shared_Folders"
* LIST (\HasChildren \Noselect) "." "Shared_Folders"
. OK Completed (0.010 secs 2 calls)
. getacl "Shared_Folders"
. NO Invalid mailbox name
This all makes sense this "Shared_Folders" is a true namespace,
while "bb" isn't. Personally, I don't think Cyrus should violate
the RFC because a client is brain dead. From RFC2060:
\Noselect It is not possible to use this name as a selectable
mailbox.
Use Office XP, complain to Microsoft, or don't use the altnamespace
option.
--
Amos
