..,
> 4096) = 3559
> lseek(5, -2272, SEEK_CUR) = 1287
> read(5, "TZif2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\7\0\0\0\7\0\0\0\0"...,
> 4096) = 2272
> close(5)= 0
> munmap(0x7f259e1b8000, 4096)= 0
> (lots more snipped)
\0\0\7\0\0\0\7\0\0\0\0"...,
4096) = 2272
close(5) = 0
munmap(0x7f259e1b8000, 4096)= 0
(lots more snipped)
Nothing in the strace output for setsocketopt.
Suggestions on what to do to figure out why on
# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux relea
* Alexander Dalloz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1133 18:33]:
> Am Fr, den 19.11.2004 schrieb Dick Davies um 12:53:
>
> > Procmail and sendmail suffer the same disadvantage of being absolute
> > pigs to configure, best to avoid them for that reason alone IMO.
>
> Speaking about Sendmail: this is a myth an
Am Fr, den 19.11.2004 schrieb Dick Davies um 12:53:
> Procmail and sendmail suffer the same disadvantage of being absolute
> pigs to configure, best to avoid them for that reason alone IMO.
Speaking about Sendmail: this is a myth and prejudice. I don't say
Sendmail configuration is trivial. But i
> Now back to figuring out, how to plug in a custom filter into postfix
> _besides_ amavisd-new..
(Read Postfix's FILTER_README.) You can plug in anything that speaks
SMTP, for example. The docs also provide you with a sample shell script
that can be used (albeit inefficiently) quite easily.
Jo
Hi Mun Heng, hi Alexander,
On Friday 19 November 2004 04:50, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> I am not sure if we misunderstood, but with procmail you can do
> things which Sieve can't do. So for instance Sieve can not filter
> by mail body inspection and I think piping to other programs like
> spamc or
* Alexander Dalloz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1134 18:34]:
> Am Do, den 18.11.2004 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] um 14:23:
> > Postfix can do lmtp native. No need to plug procmail in beetween to invoke
> > cyrus-deliver to start some lmtp transfer to the Cyrus mailstore.
>
> > Andreas
>
> So does Sendmail
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 06:45, Wil Cooley wrote:
> Except Sieve can't lose messages, but procmail can. When a Sieve filter
> breaks, the message just goes to your INBOX.
Actually, this is not 100% true (though close), if a mail is rerouted to
another server which eventually routes it back to the cy
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 17:26 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> Fedora/redhat by default uses procmail as it's default lmtp.
>
> what do you use then? Is Cyrus considered a LMTP or..?
You're confusing LMTP and LDA; the LDA is the Local Delivery Agent and
is the name of a _role_ in the process of mail ha
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 04:50 +0100, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > > (though of course you can do more
> > > 'nasty' things than with Sieve - if always reasonlable?).
> > I don't follow.
>
> I am not sure if we misunderstood, but with procmail you can do things
> which Sieve can't do. So for instance
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 11:50, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am Fr, den 19.11.2004 schrieb Ow Mun Heng um 4:18:
>
> > So in effect, usage of cyrus IMAPd, will effectively take over
> > procmails' job as the local LDA/LMTP.
>
> Mail between Sendmail and Cyrus-IMAPd is handled over the LMTP socket.
> So
Am Fr, den 19.11.2004 schrieb Ow Mun Heng um 4:18:
> So in effect, usage of cyrus IMAPd, will effectively take over
> procmails' job as the local LDA/LMTP.
Mail between Sendmail and Cyrus-IMAPd is handled over the LMTP socket.
So procmail does not have to be used (though it could be).
> I believ
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 02:06, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am Do, den 18.11.2004 schrieb Ow Mun Heng um 8:43:
>
> > Also, I've heard that sendmail does not support maildir format natively,
> > but I've also heard that one can use procmail to deliver it into maildir
> > format.
>
> Sendmail does not k
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 22:06, John Madden wrote:
> > I'm curious on why I'm seeing more references to postfix (both here and
> > on googling) when setting up an email server (scalable/high
> > performance/etc).
>
> I can personally vouch for Postfix's performance and relative ease of
> administ
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 18:10, Peter ReuterÃs wrote:
> > I esp like sendmail after I found the "FALLBACK_MX" feature. (sendmail
> > will try to lookup and send direct via recipient MX 1st, if it fails,
> > then it goes to the fallback_mx which is most likely the ISP relay)
> >
> > Does postfix suppo
Am Do, den 18.11.2004 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] um 14:23:
> > > No Sendmail guru here, but if you use procmail you have lost on the
> > > performance comparsion ;-)
> >
> > Fedora/redhat by default uses procmail as it's default lmtp.
> >
> > what do you use then? Is Cyrus considered a LMTP or..?
>
Am Do, den 18.11.2004 schrieb Ow Mun Heng um 8:43:
> Also, I've heard that sendmail does not support maildir format natively,
> but I've also heard that one can use procmail to deliver it into maildir
> format.
Sendmail does not know anything about the mail storage, either it may be
mbox or maild
Alain Williams wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 04:45:55PM +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
[...]
[Exim variant: http://pse.anfi.org/exim/rtvcyrus.html ]
That does not work, try:
http://anfi.homeunix.net/exim/rtvcyrus.html
Sorry, I posted link from "local only preview".
--
Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 04:45:55PM +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> >On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >[...]
> >>No Sendmail guru here, but if you use procmail you have lost on the
> >>performance
> >>comparsion ;-)
> >
> >Fedora/redhat by default uses
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
No Sendmail guru here, but if you use procmail you have lost on the performance
comparsion ;-)
Fedora/redhat by default uses procmail as it's default lmtp.
what do you use then? Is Cyrus considered a LMTP or..?
If you wa
> I'm curious on why I'm seeing more references to postfix (both here and
> on googling) when setting up an email server (scalable/high
> performance/etc).
I can personally vouch for Postfix's performance and relative ease of
administration. The number of performance-enhancing knobs to turn
Zitat von Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > - A careful sendmail/milter setup with a strong machine can be faster then
> > Qmail/Postfix with traditional store/forward content filter.
>
> I'm running sendmail 8.13+clamav-milter+spamass-mil
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Zitat von Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm curious on why I'm seeing more references to postfix (both here and
> > on googling) when setting up an email server (scalable/high
> > performance/etc).
> >
> > Michael
Zitat von Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm curious on why I'm seeing more references to postfix (both here and
> on googling) when setting up an email server (scalable/high
> performance/etc).
>
> Michael Nguyen actually states that
> "Postfix + LDAP just was plain faster u
Hi all,
I'm curious on why I'm seeing more references to postfix (both here and
on googling) when setting up an email server (scalable/high
performance/etc).
Michael Nguyen actually states that
"Postfix + LDAP just was plain faster under stress than Qmail + LDAP and
Sendmail + LDAP"
I'v
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
'Course, every message IS stored in a plain text file, and folder
indexes are easy to rebuild using the reconstruct tool if you need to
manually fiddle with a mailbox. Though doing this is NOT "officially
recommended," I've never had a problem doing it.
Our
Michael Nguyen wrote:
This is unfortunate. I don't mind not using MailDir (the verdict is still
out on it. It's extremely fast for the majority of our uses, but we have
some insane users who demand to store every joke, every family email, every
love letter, and every piece of porn spam that they'
> Michael Nguyen wrote:
Hi Jules, thanks for the reply.
> >>>How do I get Cyrus to "know" what directory to look in for this user's
mail?
>
> Cyrus doesn't use maildir, and will not store mail in a user's home
> directory. It's a black box. Mine keeps all mail in /var/spool/cyrus.
> Mail comes in
Michael Nguyen wrote:
How do I get Cyrus to "know" what directory to look in for this user's mail?
Cyrus doesn't use maildir, and will not store mail in a user's home
directory. It's a black box. Mine keeps all mail in /var/spool/cyrus.
Mail comes in via LMTP, gets filtered with Sieve, and goes o
From: "Igor Brezac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
> I'll let others tackle this issue. I do suggest you learn cyrus internals
> before you proceed. Again, start with the source ($cyrus-imapd/doc)...
I agree, I should read up first. I still would be v
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
From: "Igor Brezac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
Postfix is working such that the mail store for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
/var/Accounts/m.sub/i.sub/michaeln.macnt/
postfix must not be used as an MDA (mail delivery agent)
From: "Igor Brezac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
> > Postfix is working such that the mail store for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
> > /var/Accounts/m.sub/i.sub/michaeln.macnt/
>
> postfix must not be used as an MDA (mail delivery agent) when used with
> cyrus. S
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
From: "Igor Brezac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
OK. You need to setup syslog severity level for auth facility to debug.
This will give you a few more messages in the syslog.
Igor,
I want to first thank you for all o
From: "Igor Brezac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
> OK. You need to setup syslog severity level for auth facility to debug.
> This will give you a few more messages in the syslog.
Igor,
I want to first thank you for all of your help and direction. Th
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
From: "Igor Brezac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
Nov 8 11:38:03 dev2 saslauthd[4679]: Retrying authentication
Nov 8 11:38:03 dev2 saslauthd[4679]: do_auth : auth failure:
[user=michaeln] [service=pop] [realm
From: "Igor Brezac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
> > Nov 8 11:38:03 dev2 saslauthd[4679]: Retrying authentication
> > Nov 8 11:38:03 dev2 saslauthd[4679]: do_auth : auth failure:
> > [user=michaeln] [service=pop] [realm=] [mech=ldap] [reason=U
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Igor Brezac wrote:
[snip]
Based on your saslauthd startup you need to use (unless you have some
vendor specific cyrus-sasl version):
sasl_saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux/mux
Hey Igor,
I think I'm getting closer:
Nov 8 11:38:03 de
> On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Igor Brezac wrote:
[snip]
> Based on your saslauthd startup you need to use (unless you have some
> vendor specific cyrus-sasl version):
> sasl_saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux/mux
Hey Igor,
I think I'm getting closer:
Nov 8 11:38:03 dev2 saslauthd[4679]: Retrying
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
Hi Igor,
What do you get in syslog (authlog)?
I get these errors:
Nov 6 20:03:17 dev2 pop3[15192]: DBERROR: reading
/var/imap/db/skipstamp,
assuming the worst: No such file or directory
Nov 6 20:03:18 dev2 pop3[1
> On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
>
> > Hi Igor,
> >> What do you get in syslog (authlog)?
> >
> > I get these errors:
> >
> > Nov 6 20:03:17 dev2 pop3[15192]: DBERROR: reading
/var/imap/db/skipstamp,
> > assuming the worst: No such file or directory
> > Nov 6 20:03:18 dev2 pop3[15192]
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
Hi Igor,
[snip]
Here is /etc/saslauthd.conf
ldap_servers: ldap://127.0.0.1
ldap_search_base: dc=dev2,dc=test,dc=spam
ldap_bind_dn: dc=dev2,dc=test,dc=spam
ldap_password: secret
ldap_scope: one
ldap_uidattr: userName
ldap_filter_mode: yes
There are no such
Hi Igor,
[snip]
> > Here is /etc/saslauthd.conf
> >
> > ldap_servers: ldap://127.0.0.1
> > ldap_search_base: dc=dev2,dc=test,dc=spam
> > ldap_bind_dn: dc=dev2,dc=test,dc=spam
> > ldap_password: secret
> > ldap_scope: one
>
> > ldap_uidattr: userName
> > ldap_filter_mode: yes
>
> There are no suc
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Michael Nguyen wrote:
I've been trying to get Cyrus IMAP/POP to authenticate via LDAP and I've run
into some problems. First, here's my current setup:
- Postfix 2.1.5
- OpenLDAP 2.0.25
- Cyrus 2.2.8
I have Postfix + LDAP delivering correctly. Here's an LDAP entry on our dev
se
user michaeln
+OK Name is a valid mailbox
quit
+OK
Connection closed by foreign host
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. How do I troubleshoot this?
How do I tell if Cyrus is even accessing LDAP?
Michael
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswik
Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> Darren Joy wrote:
>
>>Well, after an immense struggle, I have persuaded Cyrus to actually work.
>>I've never experienced such huge problems with any open source software,
>>this is by far the worst, by orders of magnitude. My main problem I think
>>was expected the test p
Hello everyone.
I wanted to post my setup here at my location, what my intentions are and
the direction I am heading.
Right now, im running FreeBSD 4.9, Cyrus-Imapd-2.2.3 and Cyrus-SASL-2.1.17.
Everything is working smoothly, including secure authentication as SSL. I
could not be any happier.
> > I come seeing suggestions for things I could check or
> change in order
> > to resolve this before it gets to being more of a problem
> than it is.
> > I figured I'd start with Cyrus and then move down to the OS level.
>
> One thing you might want to tr
PROTECTED]> wrote:
Funny that I haven't found much in the lines of tuning suggestions for
Cyrus on googlegroups or in the info-cyrus archives but I think I may be
in need of it. I'm using a 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD machine, Dual 600Mhz with
1.5GB of RAM and plenty of RAID5 space.
We use Cyrus+Pos
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, John Straiton wrote:
> I come seeing suggestions for things I could check or change in order to
> resolve this before it gets to being more of a problem than it is. I
> figured I'd start with Cyrus and then move down to the OS level.
One thing you might want to
Funny that I haven't found much in the lines of tuning suggestions for
Cyrus on googlegroups or in the info-cyrus archives but I think I may be
in need of it. I'm using a 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD machine, Dual 600Mhz with
1.5GB of RAM and plenty of RAID5 space.
We use Cyrus+Postfix+AMAVISd+Sp
Hi again, following up to myself:
Paul Boven wrote:
The next problem I can't fix as easily. When compiling imap/squat.c:
"./../lib/xmalloc.h", line 69: syntax error before or at: __attribute__
"./../lib/xmalloc.h", line 69: warning: old-style declaration or
incorrect type for: __attribute__
"./.
./../lib/xmalloc.h", line 69: syntax error before or at: __attribute__
"./../lib/xmalloc.h", line 69: warning: old-style declaration or
incorrect type for: __attribute__
"./../lib/xmalloc.h", line 69: warning: syntax error: empty declaration
cc: acomp failed for squat.c
The system in question is a Solaris 9 machine, using Sun One
Compiler-Collection (aka Forte 7).
Does anyone have suggestions here?
Regards, Paul Boven.
suggestions
Thanks,
Aukjan
Chuck Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And how about combining those two:
>
> 3) Rename master. Postfix has a "master" process also meaning I can't
> read the Cyrus man page (yeah big deal). But something more
> descriptive like "cyrus" would be better..
>
well, at least for Red Hat Linu
Chuck Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And how about combining those two:
>
> 3) Rename master. Postfix has a "master" process also meaning I can't
> read the Cyrus man page (yeah big deal). But something more
> descriptive like "cyrus" would be better..
Yes, I forgot to mention that conf
Wrote Cillian Sharkey on Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 07:54:32PM +:
> Just two small (trivial) suggestions:
>
> 1) Rename quota command (and manpage) to cyrquota to prevent conflict with
>existing system disk quota command. The FreeBSD port of Cyrus IMAPD does
>this.
>
&g
Just two small (trivial) suggestions:
1) Rename quota command (and manpage) to cyrquota to prevent conflict with
existing system disk quota command. The FreeBSD port of Cyrus IMAPD does
this.
2) Make the master process detach itself from terminal i.e. fork() and place
its pid in /var
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>
> It appears that searching the body of messages with whitespace is
> broken; this is a general bug affecting Cyrus and not just the
> archive.* folders on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu.
>
> I haven't tracked down the problem yet.
See bug #55. This goes back to a big can
It appears that searching the body of messages with whitespace is
broken; this is a general bug affecting Cyrus and not just the
archive.* folders on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu.
I haven't tracked down the problem yet.
Larry
Date:Tue, 23 Jan 2001 14:27:19 -0700
From: Devin Reade <[EMAIL
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:42:13 +
From: Ross Golder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Surely, a searchable web-based front-end isn't that hard to set-up?
We've been experimenting with a web-based front-end at
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/
We're not entirely happy with the technology yet
Devin Reade wrote:
>
> It's good that this list has been archived, however it its
> current form it's not very usable. With over 8000 messages
> in one folder, it's not feasible to find something without
> using server-side search capabilities, however those seem
> to be disabled. (I tried sear
David Bosso pointed out in private email that the 8000 message folder
was likely the uw-imap mailing list, not this one. Yes, the 8000 count
was for that list, but this one is close.
He also mentioned that his searches were working fine. Curious, I went
back and did some further searches. A bi
> Don't forget that with the current 8000 message mailbox scheme,
> you're talking about 8000 files in one directory. You are almost
*barring* the server side search issue..
8000 messages in one folder's nothing. I regularly have 20,000-30,000
messages, both on a heavy peice of machinary at wo
helpful here as well.
-- Michael --
- Original Message -
From: "Devin Reade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cyrus IMAPD Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 9:59 AM
Subject: Suggestions for List Archive
> It's good that thi
It's good that this list has been archived, however it its
current form it's not very usable. With over 8000 messages
in one folder, it's not feasible to find something without
using server-side search capabilities, however those seem
to be disabled. (I tried searching for text that I knew to
be
65 matches
Mail list logo
