Re: Question about squatter for Xapian

Hi!! Thank you so much Rob!! I will launch it this weekend :) :) Cheers! > El 23 ene 2020, a las 23:04, Rob N ★ escribió: > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020, at 4:38 AM, ego...@sarenet.es > wrote: >> - Does it regenerate all mailboxes indexes?. Just the non-indexed emails?. I

Re: Question about squatter for Xapian

On Fri, 24 Jan 2020, at 4:38 AM, ego...@sarenet.es wrote: > - Does it regenerate all mailboxes indexes?. Just the non-indexed emails?. I > assume it should be extremely slow… so could this be launched?. Could you > advise me please, if another way is preferred? Normally, just the non-indexed em

Re: Question about what is replicated with Cyrus replication and what isn't

An important note hereis that the messages described below are logged at the slave... so perhaps it's just all fine? But in the master I see sometimes : Feb 19 11:45:40 testmasterserver sync_client[10654]: SYNCNOTICE: highestmodseq higher on replica __, updating 623 => 630 F

Re: Question about what is replicated with Cyrus replication and what isn't

Hi mates, I have been taking a lot at the code and trying to debug this... I have seen there seems not to be replication aparently for neither squatter nor cyr_expire. For instance, ipurge seems to be replicated properly but not this way the two commented commands. I could launch them in the sl

Re: Question about conversationsdb

In the replica I assume sync_log should be off. But If I enable there sync_log_unsuppressable_channels: squatter then I assume all Xapian searches needing elements would be generated when the slave received data from the master?. Even when the slave starts empty?. Thanks mates :) --- EGOITZ AUR

Re: Question about manual replication (-u )

Thanks a lot Bron!!! :) :) --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 103 48170 Zamudio (Bizkaia) ego...@sarenet.es www.sarenet.es [1] Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico piense si es necesario hacerlo. El 08-01-2019 12:02, Bron Gondwana

Re: Question about manual replication (-u )

Yep, that's totally safe. Even doing the same user twice at the same time should be safe, though it may do extra work. Bron. On Tue, Jan 8, 2019, at 05:05, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: > Good afternoon, > > I know it seems a pretty stupid question, but some time ago, you cannot have > a Cyru

Re: Question about manual replication (-u )

Good afternoon, I know it seems a pretty stupid question, but some time ago, you cannot have a Cyrus server acting for instance as a master and as slave... it was not supported... worked... but not supported... so having multiple sync_client instances... perhaps could damage something (although I

Re: Question for upgrading

Hi Javier!, Sorry for the delay and many many thanks for your ideas :) Cheers! --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 103 48170 Zamudio (Bizkaia) ego...@sarenet.es www.sarenet.es [1] Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico piense si es

Re: Question for upgrading

Thank you so much Binarus!!! And as said before, sorry for the big delay!! --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 103 48170 Zamudio (Bizkaia) ego...@sarenet.es www.sarenet.es [1] Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico piense si es necesar

Re: Question for upgrading

Hi Nic, Sorry for the delay answering... I have been ill and later on holiday, with very very very few time to answer to nothing when coming from illness. Sorry then... My idea really, was to upgrade to 3.0... So I'm planning: - Upgrade in place from 2.3 to 2.4. - Continue giving the servic

Re: Question for upgrading

On 12/18/18 12:15 PM, Binarus wrote: > On 15.12.2018 17:05, Nic Bernstein wrote: >> On 12/13/18 9:52 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: >>> I was trying to upgrade part of our Cyrus imap installation, >>> concretely that one consisting in still 2.3. I was planning to set up >>> Cyrus 3.0. I have seen

Re: Question for upgrading

On 15.12.2018 17:05, Nic Bernstein wrote: > On 12/13/18 9:52 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: >> >> I was trying to upgrade part of our Cyrus imap installation, >> concretely that one consisting in still 2.3. I was planning to set up >> Cyrus 3.0. I have seen all works properly except for the unexpun

Re: Question for upgrading

On 13.12.2018 16:52, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: > I was trying to upgrade part of our Cyrus imap installation, concretely > that one consisting in still 2.3. I was planning to set up Cyrus 3.0. I > have seen all works properly except for the unexpunge command because as > someone stated here, a re

Re: Question for upgrading

Thank you so much Ellie!! I would test, read code when needed and finally attempt the upgrade... I think this coud work should say I'm in testing phase still, I'll keep you informed :) Cheers! --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 10

Re: Question for upgrading

> Would be fine if Bron, Ellie or someone at Fastmail could tell > something about it to us :) :) Cheeky! Thing is, at FM our production servers more or less track the master branch, so we were running "3.0" from the moment 2.5 forked off, and so our upgrade process only ever really needs to deal

Re: Question for upgrading

Hi! Yes, I assume there shouldn't be problems... in fact reconstruct in 2.4 does not have the option for upgrading the mailbox databases version with a reconstruct -V max command... So... I assume it's compatible There I could then setup a slave replication... I hope... I'll tell you :) C

Re: Question for upgrading

On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 10:40 +0100, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: > I think (and say think :) )I finally found a method. Although I'm > testing it deeply... it seems (say seems too :) ) 2.4 is compatible > with a mail spool in 2.3 (at least with my config). So I'll try to > upgrade first to 2.4 and lat

Re: Question for upgrading

Hi mate, I think (and say think :) )I finally found a method. Although I'm testing it deeply... it seems (say seems too :) ) 2.4 is compatible with a mail spool in 2.3 (at least with my config). So I'll try to upgrade first to 2.4 and later to 3.0 setting up a replication from 2.4 to 3.0. Would b

Re: Question for upgrading

On Thu, December 13, 2018 13:25, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: > Hi again! > > > Else as a simplication way can you replicate any manner a 2.3 with some > newer version?. At least in manual mode (not rolling)?. The replication protocol in 2.4 is not compatible wit 2.3. There is no easy way. I'm rsy

Re: Question for upgrading

On 12/13/18 9:52 AM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: I was trying to upgrade part of our Cyrus imap installation, concretely that one consisting in still 2.3. I was planning to set up Cyrus 3.0. I have seen all works properly except for the unexpunge command because as someone stated here, a recon

Re: Question for upgrading

Common Bron, Ellie, mates :) any advise? Cheers :) :) --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 103 48170 Zamudio (Bizkaia) ego...@sarenet.es www.sarenet.es [1] Antes de imprimir este correo electrónico piense si es necesario hacerlo. El 13

Re: Question for upgrading

Hi again! Else as a simplication way can you replicate any manner a 2.3 with some newer version?. At least in manual mode (not rolling)?. Cheers. --- EGOITZ AURREKOETXEA Departamento de sistemas 944 209 470 Parque Tecnológico. Edificio 103 48170 Zamudio (Bizkaia) ego...@sarenet.es www.sar

Re: Question about getting release source packages

* ellie timoney [2018-04-15 22:13 -0400]: On Sun, Apr 15, 2018, at 9:53 AM, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote: It may be useful to include a reference to those locations, but I'll find an email address for the website to send that recommendation. This mailing list is the right spot for that, thanks.

Re: Question about getting release source packages

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018, at 9:53 AM, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote: > It may be useful to include a reference to those locations, but > I'll find an email address for the website to send that recommendation. This mailing list is the right spot for that, thanks. You're right, the download page should

Re: Question about getting release source packages

On Sat, Apr 14, 2018, at 15:17, Jason Englander wrote: > On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote: > > > the FTP location [1] referenced on github [2], I am prompted for a > > username and password. I've tried anonymous, and various combinations > > thereof, but nothing allows me to acce

Re: Question about getting release source packages (fwd)

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote: the FTP location [1] referenced on github [2], I am prompted for a username and password. I've tried anonymous, and various combinations thereof, but nothing allows me to access the release packages. [1]: ftp://ftp.cyrusimap.org/cyrus-imapd/ [

Re: Question about moving mailboxes between partitions

Another think I have noticed too… is that cyr_expire’s actions are not sent through sync_client… to sync_server am I wrong??. Do they should? Best regards, El 15/6/2015, a las 15:54, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea escribió: > > Hi Bron! > >> El 13/6/2015, a las 1:21, Bron Gondwana escribió: >> >> On F

Re: Question about moving mailboxes between partitions

Hi Bron! > El 13/6/2015, a las 1:21, Bron Gondwana escribió: > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015, at 05:15 PM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: >> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ >>> List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ >>> To Unsub

Re: Question about moving mailboxes between partitions

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015, at 05:15 PM, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: > > > El 9/6/2015, a las 12:48, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea > > escribió: > > > > Good morning, > > > > We are running Cyrus 2.3.18 very happily. We have noticed that Cyrus > > mailbox partition (and config partition) is starting to pass t

Re: Question about moving mailboxes between partitions

> El 9/6/2015, a las 12:48, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea escribió: > > Good morning, > > We are running Cyrus 2.3.18 very happily. We have noticed that Cyrus mailbox > partition (and config partition) is starting to pass the 70% of used space. > So we have decided to add a new disk to the server > in

Re: Question about 2.4.x mailbox rename/locking behaviour

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012, at 06:04 AM, Bill Ryder wrote: > Hi all, Hi Bill, Sorry for the slow reply, I was away Friday. > We have two problems with cyrus in our environment which is constantly > used as ammunition against it. > > We are running 2.3.16 right now. > > The problems are > > 1. Ca

Re: Question about murder and lmtp

On 03/07/12 14:55 +0200, Eero Hänninen wrote: >Hello, > >I'm new in murder setup. I got it almost to work but I have question, >is there way to use lmtp as preauthed so that no extra auth required? > >Currently, mail-relay host connects to frontend server successfully >(frontend server running lmtp

Re: Question about Cyrus Murder

Hi, Quoting Andrew Morgan : On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Milos Zupancic wrote: Hi, I have a general question if this setup is an option. We have a cyrus murder setup with 2 backends, 1 mupdate, and 2 frontservers (servers are within our LAN). Everything is working as it should. For external mail acc

Re: Question about Cyrus Murder

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Milos Zupancic wrote: > Hi, > > I have a general question if this setup is an option. > We have a cyrus murder setup with 2 backends, 1 mupdate, and 2 frontservers > (servers are within our LAN). Everything is working as it should. > For external mail access we atm use a webma

Re: Question about reconstruct

Bron Gondwana wrote: >> Perhaps it would be a good idea, then, to make the '-k' behavior the >> default and use another option to invert the logic? > > Absolutely... it will probably happen in 2.4 or 2.5... it's on my list > of incompatible changes! Great, glad to hear it! Wil signature.asc

Re: Question about reconstruct

On Tuesday 12 January 2010 18:15:29 Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:57:28AM -0800, wcoo...@nakedape.cc wrote: > > > > Perhaps it would be a good idea, then, to make the '-k' behavior the > > default and use another option to invert the logic? > > Absolutely... it will probably ha

Re: Question about reconstruct

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:57:28AM -0800, wcoo...@nakedape.cc wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:24 -0200, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > >>From the Cyrus chapter of WMOGAG: > > > > The most important options for reconstruct are -r and -k. The > > -r > > option causes reconstruct to reindex the specif

Re: Question about reconstruct

> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:24 -0200, Sergio Belkin wrote: >>From the Cyrus chapter of WMOGAG: > > The most important options for reconstruct are -r and -k. The > -r > option causes reconstruct to reindex the specified mailbox and all > subordinate mailboxes, otherwise child mailboxes are not rein

Re: Question about reconstruct

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:24 -0200, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi, happy new year. > My question is: > When should I use "-f" flag on command reconstruct, and when should > not I use it? >From the Cyrus chapter of WMOGAG: The most important options for reconstruct are “-r” and “-k”. The “-r” option ca

Re: Question about cyrus ACL synchronisation - permission denied

On 25/11/09 12:43 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> acl oneuser: [lrsid] >>> setting acl INBOX oneuser lrsid >>> Could not set acl: 12 NO Permission denied >> >> I'm not quite following the --folderrec INBOX.${u} --regextrans2 >> 's/(.*)/INBOX/' parts. > I'm not sure either, but this is needed to

Re: Question about cyrus ACL synchronisation - permission denied

Le mardi 24 novembre 2009 à 16:49 -0600, Dan White a écrit : > On 24/11/09 20:16 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >I'm trying to use imapsync between two cyrus-imapd servers. > >At this time, synchronization of user mailbox went fine, with both > >content and ACL. (using the cyrus account). > > > >B

Re: Question about cyrus ACL synchronisation - permission denied

On 24/11/09 20:16 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >I'm trying to use imapsync between two cyrus-imapd servers. >At this time, synchronization of user mailbox went fine, with both >content and ACL. (using the cyrus account). > >But when I'm trying to use imapsync to synchronize ACL for shared >maiboxe

Re: Question about 'flagged' attribute

Humm I'm not sure of this but aren't annotations associated to mailboxes and not emails? On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:01:36 -0500, Brian Awood wrote: > This was just discussed on the list, check the thread > "ANNOTATEMORE => METADATA and rfc 5464" in the archive. > > -Brian > > On Monday 23 N

Re: Question about 'flagged' attribute

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:48:30 -0600, Dan White wrote: > On 23/11/09 10:17 +0100, Julien Vehent wrote: >>I was wondering if there were any undergoing work to extend the "flagged" >>attribute of IMAP into something more configurable ? >> >>I am thinking of some sort of labelling similar to what is im

Re: Question about 'flagged' attribute

This was just discussed on the list, check the thread "ANNOTATEMORE => METADATA and rfc 5464" in the archive. -Brian On Monday 23 November 2009 @ 04:17, Julien Vehent wrote: > Hello Cyrus guys, > > I was wondering if there were any undergoing work to extend the > "flagged" attribute of IMAP int

Re: Question about 'flagged' attribute

On 23/11/09 10:17 +0100, Julien Vehent wrote: >I was wondering if there were any undergoing work to extend the "flagged" >attribute of IMAP into something more configurable ? > >I am thinking of some sort of labelling similar to what is implemented on >gmail, for example, but also with the wirtual

Re: Question regarding ctl_mboxlist -u

On 09/04/2009 09:06 AM, Patrick Boutilier wrote: > Cyrus 2.2.14 > > I have a user that I can not delete: > > [r...@student2 cyrus]# /home/cyrus/deluser.pl cyrust > Login: No Errors > User ACL: OK Completed > IMAP::Admin [ delete ]: couldn't delete user.cyrust : * BYE Fatal error: > Internal error:

Re: Question about bulk mailbox transfers between backends

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Kendrick Hernandez wrote: > Hi folks, > > We're currently running a Cyrus 2.3.8 murder and are looking to bulk move > several hundred mailboxes from one backend server to another (running either > 2.3.8 or 2.3.14). > > We've done successful tests of single transfers using cyra

Re: Question about upgrading and mismatched backends

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 09:43:26AM -0400, Tim Champ wrote: > Dave McMurtrie wrote: > > Tim Champ wrote: > > > >> Hello all. My first time to post, I only recently joined the list. I'm > >> digging in deeply on an inherited cyrus install, and looking to upgrade. > >> > >> My goal is to put a n

Re: Question about upgrading and mismatched backends

Dave McMurtrie wrote: > Tim Champ wrote: > >> Hello all. My first time to post, I only recently joined the list. I'm >> digging in deeply on an inherited cyrus install, and looking to upgrade. >> >> My goal is to put a new backend server in place for our setup. Our >> basic setup is 3 front

Re: Question about upgrading and mismatched backends

Tim Champ wrote: > Hello all. My first time to post, I only recently joined the list. I'm > digging in deeply on an inherited cyrus install, and looking to upgrade. > > My goal is to put a new backend server in place for our setup. Our > basic setup is 3 front-ends, 4 back-ends and a mupdate

Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]

On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 12:32 +0100, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > > The library we're using is: > > http://www.codeproject.com/KB/IP/imaplibrary.aspx > Looking at the documentation it strikes me that there appears to be no way > to actually list the contents of a mailbox. If those commands are really

Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]

Hi, --On 19. März 2009 22:43:43 -0600 Paulino Calderon wrote: Yeah I've realized it would be for the best to replace that old library. It's going to fail again if we leave it there. Anyway, I'm still curious why it broke after the upgrade, what do you guys think? Is it just not following a n

Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]

Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 06:20:49PM -0600, Paulino Calderon wrote: > >> Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: >> >>> -- Paulino Calderon is rumored to have >>> mumbled on 19. März 2009 11:40:53 -0600 regarding Re: Question

Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 06:20:49PM -0600, Paulino Calderon wrote: > Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > > -- Paulino Calderon is rumored to have > > mumbled on 19. März 2009 11:40:53 -0600 regarding Re: Question about > > CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]: > > > >>>&g

Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]

Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > -- Paulino Calderon is rumored to have > mumbled on 19. März 2009 11:40:53 -0600 regarding Re: Question about > CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]: > >>>> As you can see, the connection is being established succesfully but >>>> our

Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]

-- Paulino Calderon is rumored to have mumbled on 19. März 2009 11:40:53 -0600 regarding Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]: As you can see, the connection is being established succesfully but our program ( it was running OK for almost 2 years btw ) is sending a: IMAP FETCH

Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]

Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > Hi, > > --On 18. März 2009 21:14:36 -0600 Paulino Calderon > wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> We recently upgraded cyrus-imapd in one of our production servers >> (debian btw) to 2.2.13-14+b3. After that, one of our programs stopped >> working complaining about not being able

Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]

> We recently upgraded cyrus-imapd in one of our production servers > (debian btw) to 2.2.13-14+b3. After that, one of our programs stopped > working complaining about not being able to fetch the messages, so I > took a look at the traffic between our imap server and the program and I > saw this:

Re: Question about CYRUS-IMAP and FETCH BODY[]

Hi, --On 18. März 2009 21:14:36 -0600 Paulino Calderon wrote: Hey guys, We recently upgraded cyrus-imapd in one of our production servers (debian btw) to 2.2.13-14+b3. After that, one of our programs stopped working complaining about not being able to fetch the messages, so I took a look at

Re: question about logging

Thank you. The configuration directory on Debian Etch is /var/lib/cyrus and it workks fine. Attila > To get all the gory details about the IMAP commands, you'll need to > enable IMAP telemetry logging. Go to your {configdirectory}/log/ > directory (I think it is /var/spool/cyrus/config/log on D

Re: question about logging

On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Mester wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Debian Etch server with Cyrus IMAPD (version). Is there a way > to make logging verbose? I want to be able to find in the logfiles who > has logged in to the IMAP server from which IP address and what did > he/she do. > > I have to find out who

Re: Question ??

--On Thursday, October 2, 2008 9:10 -0400 Valentino Sawney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Periodically some clients get this error "Mailbox is locked by POP server > " whenever they try to connect to our frontend mail servers. > > > > I am currently running the cyrus murder cluster in product

Re: Question about bodystructure answer on cyrus 2.2.13 (debian etch)

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Bron Gondwana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:10:27PM +0200, Thomas Cataldo wrote: >> NIL)("MESSAGE" "RFC822" ("NAME*" {147} >> ISO-8859-1''%6A%27%61%69%20%6C%61%6E%63%E9%20%75%6E%65%20%67%72%6F%73%73%65%20%69%6D%70%72%65%73%73%69%6F%6E%20%73%

Re: Question about bodystructure answer on cyrus 2.2.13 (debian etch)

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:10:27PM +0200, Thomas Cataldo wrote: > NIL)("MESSAGE" "RFC822" ("NAME*" {147} > ISO-8859-1''%6A%27%61%69%20%6C%61%6E%63%E9%20%75%6E%65%20%67%72%6F%73%73%65%20%69%6D%70%72%65%73%73%69%6F%6E%20%73%75%72%20%4C%50%32%33%30%30%52%56) > NIL NIL "8BIT" 1544 ("Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10

Re: Question about deleted emails (emails being marked as deleted)

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Denis BUCHER might have said: > Dave McMurtrie a écrit : > >> Many email clients simply marks emails as deleted when moving them or > >> deleting them ? Which makes a huge amount of "ghost" emails filling our > >> server. > >> > >> Is there a way with a simple script to dele

Re: Question about deleted emails (emails being marked as deleted)

Dave McMurtrie a écrit : >> Many email clients simply marks emails as deleted when moving them or >> deleting them ? Which makes a huge amount of "ghost" emails filling our >> server. >> >> Is there a way with a simple script to delete all deleted emails let's >> say older than 30 days ? > > Ch

Re: Question about deleted emails (emails being marked as deleted)

Denis BUCHER wrote: > Hello, > > Many email clients simply marks emails as deleted when moving them or > deleting them ? Which makes a huge amount of "ghost" emails filling our > server. > > Is there a way with a simple script to delete all deleted emails let's > say older than 30 days ? Chec

Re: question from a beginner

On 9/27/07, Toschi Pietro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello list > > I'm a beginner in cyrus imapd and mailing in general so I am quite confused. > > I'm wandering which is the best method or best practice to have an external > process informed about a message being: > > a) delivered

Re: Question about using ipurge

I've misunderstood the man page. Thanks > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Andrew Morgan wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, AndrXs Tarallo wrote: > > > >> We need to clean certain mails from a mailbox. Specifically we are > >> trying to clean mails older than 30 days. So we execute (as cyrus) > >> this comma

Re: Question about using ipurge

* Andrew Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20061017 10:17]: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Andrew Morgan wrote: > > >On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, AndrXs Tarallo wrote: > > > >>We need to clean certain mails from a mailbox. Specifically we are > >>trying to clean mails older than 30 days. So we execute (as cyrus) > >>th

Re: Question about using ipurge

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Andrew Morgan wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, AndrXs Tarallo wrote: We need to clean certain mails from a mailbox. Specifically we are trying to clean mails older than 30 days. So we execute (as cyrus) this command: ipurge -d 30 username It returns almost inmediately but not

Re: Question about using ipurge

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, AndrXs Tarallo wrote: We need to clean certain mails from a mailbox. Specifically we are trying to clean mails older than 30 days. So we execute (as cyrus) this command: ipurge -d 30 username It returns almost inmediately but nothing happens and the mails remain there. We

Re: Question on Cyrus murder architecture

On Wednesday 14 June 2006 12:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Greg Boug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm looking to implement a murder of imap daemons, but not all of > > them are > > going to be heavily loaded. I'm attempting to set the system up > > using > > multiple servers

Re: Question on Cyrus murder architecture

Quoting Greg Boug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi guys, > > I'm looking to implement a murder of imap daemons, but not all of > them are > going to be heavily loaded. I'm attempting to set the system up > using > multiple servers acting as both a front and back end. Ie. they > are both > running proxyd

Re: question about hardware architecture.

take a look at this link, http://linux-ha.org/DRBD_2fNFS. it's not exactly what you want to do but you can apply the concepts to fit your needs. you need to setup the haresources to, mount the filesystem, start cyrus, and do the ipaddr takeover. i stongly suggest that you use to stonith to p

Re: question about hardware architecture.

> > Thanks. For future : I want to use EMC because of price. My emplyer > > has big price reduction. > > All servers will be conected through Brocade FC switches. > > I don't want to mount one LUN to few servers. But i'm need to > > be able to mount this LUN only once but every server need to by ab

Re: question about hardware architecture.

> 2005/9/30, Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > Helo. >> > >> > I was asked to prepere hardware architecture to Cyrus based >> > e-mail system for large number of accounts. >> > >> > What i want to propose is. >> > >> > 4 IBM xSeries 346 for mailbox servers. >> > EMC CX700 as storeage. >> > >>

Re: question about hardware architecture.

2005/9/30, Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Helo. > > > > I was asked to prepere hardware architecture to Cyrus based > > e-mail system for large number of accounts. > > > > What i want to propose is. > > > > 4 IBM xSeries 346 for mailbox servers. > > EMC CX700 as storeage. > > > > But i dont

Re: question about hardware architecture.

> Helo. > > I was asked to prepere hardware architecture to Cyrus based > e-mail system for large number of accounts. > > What i want to propose is. > > 4 IBM xSeries 346 for mailbox servers. > EMC CX700 as storeage. > > But i dont know how te resolve problem of mountig volumes from EMC. > > I want

Re: Question - Daemon Problem

I'm sure you figured this out by now, but cyrus is to be run via the master process, and not via inetd. If you would read the manual, you will find ti most enlightening. On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:52:44 +0200 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings > I use imapd 2.2.12, i have no init or other start

Re: Question - Daemon Problem

im sorry i did forget that master is a own daemon who manage this sorry thanks! cya Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Re: Question - Daemon Problem

## [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I use imapd 2.2.12, i have no init or other start scripts . > When i start imapd over xinetd, or when i start the pop3 client (pop3d) over > xinetd the error below is in logs Cyrus uses its own "master" process for starting the daemons. It's all in the

Re: Question about cyrus quotas - how it behaves

Anthony Tibbs wrote: Check out quotawarn: and quotawarnkb: in man imapd.conf. They result in IMAP ALERT messages being generated. Note that these alerts are sent on SELECT, and it has been claimed that Outlook SELECTs a lot, making it unusable. I have not verified this. Indeed, this can be a p

Re: Question about cyrus quotas - how it behaves

Check out quotawarn: and quotawarnkb: in man imapd.conf. They result in IMAP ALERT messages being generated. Note that these alerts are sent on SELECT, and it has been claimed that Outlook SELECTs a lot, making it unusable. I have not verified this. Indeed, this can be a problem if you have a la

Re: Question about cyrus quotas - how it behaves

On Wed, 4 May 2005, David R Bosso wrote: --On May 4, 2005 4:19:51 PM -0600 Sun Advocate Webmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just a question for all of you about quotas on cyrus imap. As far as I see, there is no "grace" quota or warning system. Users not watching the size of their mailboxes won'

Re: Question about cyrus quotas - how it behaves

On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 15:58 -0700, David R Bosso wrote: > In addition to the IMAP ALERTs provided by the quotawarn settings, we do a > weekly cron script that sends an email to users approaching quota. And in case the user is already over quota, 'deliver -q' will deliver the message regardless,

Re: Question about cyrus quotas - how it behaves

--On May 4, 2005 4:19:51 PM -0600 Sun Advocate Webmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just a question for all of you about quotas on cyrus imap. As far as I see, there is no "grace" quota or warning system. Users not watching the size of their mailboxes won't know they're near full until they're ac

Re: question about sieve "discard"

Andreas Hasenack wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:37:55PM +0200, Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: 4.5. Action discard Syntax: discard Discard is used to silently throw away the message. It does so by ^ simply canceling the imp

Re: question about sieve "discard"

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:37:55PM +0200, Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: > 4.5. Action discard > >Syntax: discard > >Discard is used to silently throw away the message. It does so by > ^ >simply canceling the implici

Re: question about sieve "discard"

Andreas Hasenack wrote: A friend of mine had these rules (cyrus-imapd-2.2.12): --8<--- if elsif elsif header :contains "From" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" { discard; } if ... (script continues) --8<--- Note how the if/elsif structure is broken and a new if statement begins

Re: question about sieve "discard"

--On Wednesday, April 27, 2005 15:46 -0300 Andreas Hasenack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Note how the if/elsif structure is broken and a new if statement begins later on. That was a copy&paste error (the second "if" should have been "elsif" to continue the case-like structure). The interesting th

Re: question

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello my config is attached down. but i heard from the coder that i must rebuild the index isnst it done @ restart? (when i delete) if not do you know the command? thx richard I assume that they are referring to the "reconstruct" command, which you wi

Re: question

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello i have a problem i did convert the mbox to cyrus format with this script which is down (but complete its just a part of it) the files 1.2.3. etc are in /var/spool/imap/user/username in. But when i try to recive it he means 0 mails... Permissions

Re: question

hello my config is attached down. but i heard from the coder that i must rebuild the index isnst it done @ restart? (when i delete) if not do you know the command? thx richard --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: h

Re: Question about lmtp.lock

info-cyrus -- Amos Gouaux wrote: David G Mcmurtrie wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Michael Loftis wrote: There are a number of different lockfiles that cyrus uses during it's lifecycle. Though one thing you need to know is that it is not designed to run like you're attempting to run it. Each cyrus

Re: Question about lmtp.lock

David G Mcmurtrie wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Michael Loftis wrote: There are a number of different lockfiles that cyrus uses during it's lifecycle. Though one thing you need to know is that it is not designed to run like you're attempting to run it. Each cyrus instance is meant to be standalone

Re: Question about lmtp.lock

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Michael Loftis wrote: There are a number of different lockfiles that cyrus uses during it's lifecycle. Though one thing you need to know is that it is not designed to run like you're attempting to run it. Each cyrus instance is meant to be standalone, and running them all

Re: Question about lmtp.lock

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Michael Loftis wrote: > There are a number of different lockfiles that cyrus uses during it's > lifecycle. Though one thing you need to know is that it is not designed to > run like you're attempting to run it. Each cyrus instance is meant to be > standalone, and running the

  1   2   >