# Samuli Suominen (28 Dec 2013)
# Replaced by 'emerge @module-rebuild' set in Portage itself.
# Removal in 30 days, see http://bugs.gentoo.org/410739
sys-kernel/module-rebuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/26/2013 01:27 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:25:04 +0100 hasufell
> wrote:
>> That is funny that you mention "cleaning up". I remember last
>> time when you broke 8 ebuilds at once because you just trusted
>> your outdated
> >> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate,
> >> you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff.
> >
> > That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able
> > to address. You should raise this issue with them rather than
> > accusing each other on the list
On 12/28/2013 03:44 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate,
you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff.
>>>
>>> That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able
>>> to address. You should raise this issue with t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:11:41 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> I feel that this thread is a sign that
> there is a problem on how the new QA communicates problems with the
> developers that cause them.
This thread can also be perceived as the results o
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:44:45 +
Markos Chandras wrote:
> It certainly isn't to the person who caused the problem
Hard to tell from skimming the context, but in his first mail there is
an acknowledgment that there was previous communication between both
persons; it just appears to be that both
> The discussion is based on some questions that are hard to agree on:
>
> 1. How much of a problem is an unused USE flag in metadata.xml?
Cosmetic issue. No functional impact.
> 2. Should such repoman warnings be fixed? By whom? When? How?
Yes. You see it, you fix it.
Not fixing cosmetic is
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 18:26:47 +0100
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > The discussion is based on some questions that are hard to agree on:
> >
> > 1. How much of a problem is an unused USE flag in metadata.xml?
>
> Cosmetic issue. No functional impact.
This is a description of an unused USE flag instea
On 12/28/2013 04:44 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 12/28/2013 03:44 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>
> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate,
> you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff.
That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
static-libs - Build static libraries
This can be ambiguous as some packages (like SDL2 - after I apply the
necessary patch) have libraries that are not supposed to be dynamic at
all.
An alternative description would be:
static-libs - Build static ver
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 08:25:19PM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 31/10/2013 09:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > dev-util/checkbashisms
> As described in bug #426828, this package currently uses an abandoned
> upstream, with a much more recent version maintained by Debian. I'd like
> to, at a
Hi all,
As a followup on my October email, I'm dropping some more packages.
In October, I was still at 300+, now I'm at 195, and I think the ~60 odd
below should also go out to other developers.
The prior email primarily covered packages where I was there maintainer,
and there was no herd to take
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As a followup on my October email, I'm dropping some more packages.
> In October, I was still at 300+, now I'm at 195, and I think the ~60 odd
> below should also go out to other developers.
>
> The prior email primarily covere
13 matches
Mail list logo
