On 11-09-2013 10:51:22 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > > shouldn't that be EROOT ?
> >
> > and ED in that case too
>
> Do we still use that in EAPI > 3 ?
EROOT = ROOT + EPREFIX
ED = D + EPREFIX
Unless I misunderstand your question, that means "yes, we do" to me.
Fabian
--
Fabian Gro
Le mardi 10 septembre 2013 à 17:10 +0200, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
> On 10-09-2013 06:22:38 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > > pkg_preinst() {
> > >gnome2_gdk_pixbuf_savelist
> > > +
> > > + # Make sure loaders.cache belongs to gdk-pixbuf alone
> > > + local cache="usr/$(get_l
On 10-09-2013 06:22:38 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > pkg_preinst() {
> >gnome2_gdk_pixbuf_savelist
> > +
> > + # Make sure loaders.cache belongs to gdk-pixbuf alone
> > + local cache="usr/$(get_libdir)/${PN}-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache"
> > +
> > + if [[ -e ${ROOT}${cach
On 2013-09-09, at 7:31 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 09/09/13 08:29 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>>
>> [1;32mIndex: gdk-pixbuf-2.28.2.ebuild[0;0m
>> [1;32m===[0;0m
>> [1;32mRCS file:
>> /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/gdk-pixb
On 09/09/13 08:29 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>
> [1;32mIndex: gdk-pixbuf-2.28.2.ebuild[0;0m
> [1;32m===[0;0m
> [1;32mRCS file:
> /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-2.28.2.ebuild,v[0;0m
> [1;32mretriev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2013 02:29 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> As a follow up to this discussion, I came with the attached patch.
> It appears to work ok for regular merges and binpkg merges with
> FEATURES="collision-protect".
>
> Per my reading of PMS it d
As a follow up to this discussion, I came with the attached patch. It
appears to work ok for regular merges and binpkg merges with
FEATURES="collision-protect".
Per my reading of PMS it does not appear to violate anything so I guess
it is ok.
--
Gilles Dartiguelongue
Gentoo
[1;32mIndex: gdk-pi
Dnia 2013-09-04, o godz. 22:19:30
Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
> Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:48 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a écrit :
> > On 04/09/13 03:44 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > > Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a
> > > écrit : [snip]
> > >>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/09/13 03:44 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a
> écrit : [snip]
>>
>> By gdk-pixbuf.cache , you mean the 'loaders.cache' file that the
>> eclass is now continuously updating? Wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/09/13 03:48 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> No, it still does collide that first time if
> FEATURES="collision-protect" is enabled. In fact, I do not
> believe there is (by design) any way for this ebuild to 'take
> ownership' of a file it doe
Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a écrit :
> On 04/09/13 02:57 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
[snip]
> > Is there any other solution or is there any other point that would
> > move the balance from one solution to another ?
> >
> > This solution would also be applied
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/09/13 04:19 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:48 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a
> écrit :
>>
>> You had FEATURES="collision-protect" enabled" or the default
>> FEATURES="protect-owned" ?
>
> the default, but s
Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:48 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a écrit :
> On 04/09/13 03:44 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a
> > écrit : [snip]
> >>
> >> By gdk-pixbuf.cache , you mean the 'loaders.cache' file that the
> >> eclas
On 09/04/2013 12:44 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a écrit :
>> If you want to do that *and* maintain whatever is currently in that
>> file, you can use the trick sys-apps/openrc used to do: in
>> pkg_preinst, copy the system file (
Dnia 2013-09-04, o godz. 20:57:41
Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
> One last point to handle, how to migrate gdk-pixbuf.cache so that it is
> owned by the ebuild ?
>
> I've discussed this with Michał and it seems two options are possible.
>
> 1. rm the file on the filesystem in pkg_preinst in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/09/13 02:57 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> One last point to handle, how to migrate gdk-pixbuf.cache so that
> it is owned by the ebuild ?
>
> I've discussed this with Michał and it seems two options are
> possible.
>
> 1. rm the file on
One last point to handle, how to migrate gdk-pixbuf.cache so that it is
owned by the ebuild ?
I've discussed this with Michał and it seems two options are possible.
1. rm the file on the filesystem in pkg_preinst in gdk-pixbuf ebuild
pros:
- works immediately without fiddling with profiles (see
Updated diffs + gdk-pixbuf handling.
Tested with success locally.
--
Gilles Dartiguelongue
Gentoo
Index: gnome2.eclass
===
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/gnome2.eclass,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -B -r1.122 gnome2
Dnia 2013-09-01, o godz. 13:29:27
Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
>
> Le samedi 31 août 2013 à 18:44 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
> > Le samedi 31 août 2013 à 16:49 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit :
> > > Dnia 2013-08-31, o godz. 15:00:43
> > > Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
> > >
>
Le samedi 31 août 2013 à 18:44 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
> Le samedi 31 août 2013 à 16:49 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit :
> > Dnia 2013-08-31, o godz. 15:00:43
> > Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
> >
> > > Le samedi 31 août 2013 à 13:40 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit :
> > > > > +
Le samedi 31 août 2013 à 16:49 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit :
> Dnia 2013-08-31, o godz. 15:00:43
> Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
>
> > Le samedi 31 août 2013 à 13:40 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit :
> > > > + cat "${tmp_file}" >
> > > > "${EROOT}usr/$(get_libdir)/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loa
Dnia 2013-08-31, o godz. 15:00:43
Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
> Le samedi 31 août 2013 à 13:40 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit :
> > > + cat "${tmp_file}" >
> > > "${EROOT}usr/$(get_libdir)/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders.cache"
> >
> > Why not mv or cp? Also you need '|| die' here since 'cat'
On 31/08/13 09:00 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>> > And please ensure to remove it in pkg_postrm() when last version
>> > of gdk-pixbuf is unmerged.
> I am not clear on this last sentence. Could you reformulate it please ?
Ensure that the loaders.cache file is removed correctly when all
versio
Le samedi 31 août 2013 à 13:40 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit :
> Dnia 2013-08-31, o godz. 13:07:41
> Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
>
> > +# @FUNCTION: gnome2_gdk_pixbuf_savelist
> > +# @DESCRIPTION:
> > +# Find if there is any gdk-pixbuf loader to install and save the list in
> > +# GNOME2_ECLA
Dnia 2013-08-31, o godz. 13:07:41
Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
> +# @FUNCTION: gnome2_gdk_pixbuf_savelist
> +# @DESCRIPTION:
> +# Find if there is any gdk-pixbuf loader to install and save the list in
> +# GNOME2_ECLASS_GDK_PIXBUF_LOADERS variable.
> +# This function should be called from pk
As described here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483128
This is a very lightweight patch to support the few packages that
provide gdk pixbuf loaders. The ones I know of are: gdk-pixbuf itself,
librsvg and libopenraw and emul-gtklibs but more could be missing simply
because they do not r
26 matches
Mail list logo
