Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:48 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a écrit :
> On 04/09/13 03:44 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a
> > écrit : [snip]
> >> 
> >> By gdk-pixbuf.cache , you mean the 'loaders.cache' file that the 
> >> eclass is now continuously updating?  Which ebuild is going to
> >> 'own' it?
> > 
> > yes, gdk-pixbuf is going to own it since it is the main loader
> > provider and the package that provides the tool to generate the
> > cache.
> > 
> >> Also, is it owned by anything right now?  IIRC we don't try 
> >> particularly hard to support FEATURES="collision-protect" in the
> >> tree, but rather FEATURES="protect-owned", and so if the file is
> >> currently sitting there unowned by any package, afaik you
> >> shouldn't get any collisions by installing over it.
> > 
> > it is not owned by any package right now but touching the file in 
> > src_install made collision-protect abort the install.
> 
> You had FEATURES="collision-protect" enabled"  or the default
> FEATURES="protect-owned" ?
the default, but since I only touched the file, maybe it's
FEATURES="config-protect-if-modified" kicking in ?

-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <e...@gentoo.org>
Gentoo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to