Dnia 2013-09-04, o godz. 22:19:30 Gilles Dartiguelongue <e...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:48 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a écrit : > > On 04/09/13 03:44 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > > > Le mercredi 04 septembre 2013 à 15:23 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius a > > > écrit : [snip] > > >> > > >> By gdk-pixbuf.cache , you mean the 'loaders.cache' file that the > > >> eclass is now continuously updating? Which ebuild is going to > > >> 'own' it? > > > > > > yes, gdk-pixbuf is going to own it since it is the main loader > > > provider and the package that provides the tool to generate the > > > cache. > > > > > >> Also, is it owned by anything right now? IIRC we don't try > > >> particularly hard to support FEATURES="collision-protect" in the > > >> tree, but rather FEATURES="protect-owned", and so if the file is > > >> currently sitting there unowned by any package, afaik you > > >> shouldn't get any collisions by installing over it. > > > > > > it is not owned by any package right now but touching the file in > > > src_install made collision-protect abort the install. > > > > You had FEATURES="collision-protect" enabled" or the default > > FEATURES="protect-owned" ? > > the default, but since I only touched the file, maybe it's > FEATURES="config-protect-if-modified" kicking in ? The default is 'protect-owned' only. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
