> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote:
>> Let's call it "sci-machine-learning/".
> Looks good, but would be better without the second hyphen:
> "sci-machinelearning". Kind of similar to "app-mobilephone".
> There is indeed no limit on the category name length or structure
On 2025-03-11, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 3/10/25 4:53 PM, Maciej Barć wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> Although maybe it should be sci-ml.
>>
>> Let's _not_ use *-ml since for us ml stands for OCaml (which comes from
>> ML - "Meta langauge").
>>
>> sci-ai, dev-ai, and app-ai (say, "app-ai/ollama"?) are nice
W dniu 10.03.2025 o 23:42, Eli Schwartz pisze:
I don't understand your argument at all. "ml" is hardly a reserved
concept, and dev-ml exists precisely for "libraries and utilities
relevant to the ML programming language", which isn't going to get
confused with sci-ml/ for the same reason nobody w
To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called"
AI packages I think that a new category should be created.
Maybe sci-ai/ or dev-ai/ or sci-dl/ (deep-learning)
sci-libs has now 264 packages
The packages that I can move from sci-libs in the new category are:
caffe2
datasets
evaluate
On 3/10/25 4:53 PM, Maciej Barć wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Although maybe it should be sci-ml.
>
> Let's _not_ use *-ml since for us ml stands for OCaml (which comes from
> ML - "Meta langauge").
>
> sci-ai, dev-ai, and app-ai (say, "app-ai/ollama"?) are nice IMO.
- please don't top-post
- Let's _not_
