Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:25:51 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Brian Dolbec > wrote: > > > > It does not other the the metadata.dtd file it checks for updates > > and updates itself with. But that is very likely to change with the > > rewrite I have in progress (albei

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: using Ninja in more CMake-based packages

2015-08-19 Thread Johannes Huber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 06/07/15 um 17:08 schrieb Michał Górny: > Hello, developers. > [snip] > Sadly, there are two problems with using Ninja: > > 1) it will not work with some packages, > [snip] > > So, what do you think? Should I start switching random packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > It does not other the the metadata.dtd file it checks for updates and > updates itself with. But that is very likely to change with the > rewrite I have in progress (albeit slowly). I have also seriously been > contemplating splitting off

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:24:24 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:09 PM, hasufell wrote: > > Signed-off-by has a completely different purpose which is not part > > of our workflow, so that tag is pretty useless to us most of the > > time. > > > > See https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Zac Medico
On 08/19/2015 11:11 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: >>> And how often was that useful in practice? >> >> Well, there haven't been any EAPI bumps lately. However, in the time >> that follows an EAPI bump, it can be very usefu

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:09 PM, hasufell wrote: > Signed-off-by has a completely different purpose which is not part of > our workflow, so that tag is pretty useless to us most of the time. > > See https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Talk:Gentoo_git_workflow#Sign-Off > I agree. Generally it is used to

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread hasufell
On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: >> And how often was that useful in practice? > > Well, there haven't been any EAPI bumps lately. However, in the time > that follows an EAPI bump, it can be very useful if there are new > dependency features that

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread hasufell
On 08/19/2015 08:00 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 08/19/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode >> wrote: >>> On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: > I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:00:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: > > On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: > >>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is > >>> practically useless.

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/19/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode > wrote: >> On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >>> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Zac Medico
On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: >>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is >>> practically useless. >>> >>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer a

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread hasufell
On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: >> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is >> practically useless. >> >> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his >> repoman version (which I believe wa

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: >>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is >>> practically useless. >>> >>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Damien Robichaud
V

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: >> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is >> practically useless. >> >> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his >> repoman version (which I believe wa

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Zac Medico
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: > I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is > practically useless. > > If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his > repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you > want me to a

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 19.08.2015 18:33, hasufell wrote: > I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is > practically useless. > > If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his > repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you > want me to add

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 06:33:16PM +0200, hasufell wrote: > I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is > practically useless. > > If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his > repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless y

[gentoo-dev] repoman adding "Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1" to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread hasufell
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo desktop system built with musl libc.

2015-08-19 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Tigger alert ... shameless plug. I sent the following to the musl-libc > email list yesterday. I thought other gentoo devs may be interested in what > I've been up to with musl: Very cool! Cheers, Dirkjan

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/{a lot of packages}

2015-08-19 Thread Patrice Clement
# Patrice Clement (19 Aug 2015) # Upstream dead: no releases since 2010. # Technology has moved on and there are far better alternatives # (easymock, mockito and jmock). # Masked for removal in 30 days. See bug #190307. dev-java/mockobjects # Patrice Clement (19 Aug 2015) # Upstream dead too: no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo desktop system built with musl libc.

2015-08-19 Thread Alexander Hof
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Anthony G. Basile schrieb: > Hi everyone, > > Tigger alert ... shameless plug. I sent the following to the > musl-libc email list yesterday. I thought other gentoo devs may be > interested in what I've been up to with musl: > [...] Very interest

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo desktop system built with musl libc.

2015-08-19 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, Tigger alert ... shameless plug. I sent the following to the musl-libc email list yesterday. I thought other gentoo devs may be interested in what I've been up to with musl: I want to announce to the list that I've built and will be maintaining three hardened, fully featured