On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: >> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is >> practically useless. >> >> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his >> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you >> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;). >> >> Let's just remove it. >> > > The intent is to leave a record of the version of repoman used, which > leaves an audit trail in case there's a bug in some some version (or to > detect if someone is using an ancient version). It can especially be > useful when new repoman checks need to be added for new EAPI features. >
Why is it called "Package-Manager:" then? And how often was that useful in practice?
