On 08/19/2015 12:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Matthew Thode > <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On 08/19/2015 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >>> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: >>>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is >>>> practically useless. >>>> >>>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his >>>> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you >>>> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;). >>>> >>>> Let's just remove it. >>>> >>> >>> The intent is to leave a record of the version of repoman used, which >>> leaves an audit trail in case there's a bug in some some version (or to >>> detect if someone is using an ancient version). It can especially be >>> useful when new repoman checks need to be added for new EAPI features. >>> >> If repoman supported adding a signedoffby line I'd likely use it more >> for commits. Still running repoman full before commit though. > > I do not believe we have an requirement for adding Signed-off-by in > the gentoo repository. Why do you feel the need to do that? > General completeness is all
-- -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
