On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:00:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: > > On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: > >>> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is > >>> practically useless. > >>> > >>> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his > >>> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you > >>> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;). > >>> > >>> Let's just remove it. > >>> > >> > >> The intent is to leave a record of the version of repoman used, which > >> leaves an audit trail in case there's a bug in some some version (or to > >> detect if someone is using an ancient version). It can especially be > >> useful when new repoman checks need to be added for new EAPI features. > >> > > > > Why is it called "Package-Manager:" then? > > Because repoman in bundled with portage, I guess. I suppose we could > change it to something else.
How about the line below? Signed-off-by: <dev name> (repoman <version>) Cheers, —Guilherme
