Same reason you hear "can't trademark certain parts of speech". Half informed
zealots go off half cocked.
For instance, here is apparently authoritative advice that a trademark can only
be an adjective:
http://www.ramseylawgroup.com/viewarticle.php?id=21
And here is a real world analysis:
> On 28 Jan 16, at 21:47, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> As a regular english word, "beam" cannot be trademarked, by others/us.
>>
>> Like Windows® or Apple®?
>
>
> oh, snap. True.
>
>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > As a regular english word, "beam" cannot be trademarked, by others/us.
>
> Like Windows® or Apple®?
oh, snap. True.
Hrm. Given that, I'm confused why I keep hearing "oh, natural word,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> As a regular english word, "beam" cannot be trademarked, by others/us.
Like Windows® or Apple®?
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For ad
As a regular english word, "beam" cannot be trademarked, by others/us. Yet
the *pair* of words, "Apache Beam" can be implicitly/explicitly trademarked.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/16, 3:26 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
>
> >I prefer Beam ;)
>
> I like t
On 1/28/16, 3:26 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
>I prefer Beam ;)
I like the name and the logic behind choosing it. Some concerns are that
a Google search of "Beam Software" turned up [1] and [2] among others,
which might mean that Apache Beam won't work as a TLP name. "Beam" is a
good st
LOL ;)
Regards
JB
On 01/28/2016 01:00 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Hi Bertrand,
Your suggested name only has an entropy of 0.19153. You may consider
adding a special character or two :). To standardize (every company
seems to like this lately) we may consider using SHA-256 for our project
names.
Hi Bertrand,
Your suggested name only has an entropy of 0.19153. You may consider
adding a special character or two :). To standardize (every company
seems to like this lately) we may consider using SHA-256 for our project
names. Being of fixed length it will help Sally in her templates for
p
I prefer Beam ;)
Regards
JB
On 01/28/2016 12:25 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Serge Huber wrote:
...Please ignore my last message, I missed the fact that a project was already
existing
with the name “Arrow”...
Hehe, that's the risk when using common names
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Serge Huber wrote:
> ...Please ignore my last message, I missed the fact that a project was
> already existing
> with the name “Arrow”...
Hehe, that's the risk when using common names, with about 200 projects
here. Naming your project sdkjhkjhsdfxyhs is safer in
Please ignore my last message, I missed the fact that a project was already
existing with the name “Arrow”.
cheers,
Serge…
> On 28 janv. 2016, at 11:01, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:22 PM, James Malone
> wrote:
>> ...To that end, the name we propose to use i
On a lighter side…
Just to mess with you guys if you’re looking at an alternative name I might
suggest :
Apache Arrow
I thought of this because I was thinking of how an arrow flows through the air,
might be deviated, and it also associates with something sharp, dangerous and
fast :) And of
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 6:22 PM, James Malone
wrote:
> ...To that end, the name we propose to use is:
>
> Apache Beam
The name sounds good to me and it's indeed a good idea to set it now.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gen
Hi everyone,
Based on the feedback concerning naming, we would like to rename the
proposal and the project. We want to do this early to ensure we don't
disrupt the project based on naming. To that end, the name we propose to
use is:
Apache Beam
The name Beam is based on a joining of Batch and st
Hi Renaud and Bertrand,
No worries Bertrand ! And thanks Renaud ;)
Regards
JB
On 01/26/2016 04:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Bonjour Renaud,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Renaud Richardet wrote:
...Please add me to “Additional Interested Contributors” section as well
I've done
Bonjour Renaud,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Renaud Richardet wrote:
> ...Please add me to “Additional Interested Contributors” section as well
I've done this, happily! (JB I hope you don't mind).
(I know Renaud for quite some time and I think he can make great
contributions to Dataflow
Bonjour,
Please add me to “Additional Interested Contributors” section as well.
I am an Apache UIMA committer, and would like to use Dataflow to process
large amounts of text [1]. I just started a POC [2] and really like the API
so far.
Thanks, Renaud
[1] https://github.com/BlueBrain/bluima
[2
Hey Ajay,
great: I added you on the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/25/2016 06:25 AM, Ajay Yadav wrote:
Great proposal. I would also like to contribute to the project especially
the Python SDK, if possible.
Cheers
Ajay Yadava
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
Great proposal. I would also like to contribute to the project especially
the Python SDK, if possible.
Cheers
Ajay Yadava
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Seshu,
>
> it does both: streaming and batching data processing.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/23/2016 03:01 P
Hi Seshu,
it does both: streaming and batching data processing.
Regards
JB
On 01/23/2016 03:01 PM, Adunuthula, Seshu wrote:
Did not get a chance to play with it yet, Within Google is it used more as
a MR replacement or a Stream processing engine? Or it does both of them
fantastically well?
O
Did not get a chance to play with it yet, Within Google is it used more as
a MR replacement or a Stream processing engine? Or it does both of them
fantastically well?
On 1/22/16, 10:58 AM, "Frances Perry" wrote:
>Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the
>meantim
Very great proposal!
Agreed to Stain, the name, Dataflow, is used widely long time,
maybe should think about another one.
Thanks.
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 1/22/16, 10:58 AM, "Frances Perry" wrote:
>
> >Crunch
On 1/22/16, 10:58 AM, "Frances Perry" wrote:
>Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the
>meantime inside Google, FlumeJava evolved into Dataflow. So all three
>share
>a number of concepts like PCollections, ParDo, DoFn, etc. However,
>Dataflow
>adds a number of n
Thanks Frances ! That explains it.
Wrote a couple of posts on basic usage of Crunch, may be its time to
rewrite them with Dataflow.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Frances Perry wrote:
> Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the
> meantime inside Google, FlumeJa
Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the
meantime inside Google, FlumeJava evolved into Dataflow. So all three share
a number of concepts like PCollections, ParDo, DoFn, etc. However, Dataflow
adds a number of new things -- the biggest being a unified batch/streamin
Crunch has Spark pipelines, but not sure about the runner abstraction.
May be Josh Wills or Tom White can provide more insight on this topic.
They are core devs for both projects :)
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know deeply Crunch, but AFAIK, Crun
Hi,
I don't know deeply Crunch, but AFAIK, Crunch creates MapReduce
pipeline, it doesn't provide runner abstraction. It's based on FlumeJava.
The logic is very similar (with DoFns, pipelines, ...). Correct me if
I'm wrong, but Crunch started after Google Dataflow, especially because
Dataflow
Hi JB,
Curious to know about how it compares to Apache Crunch? Constructs
looks very familiar (had used Crunch long ago)
Thoughts?
- Ashish
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Seshu,
>
> I blogged about Apache Dataflow proposal:
> http://blog.nanthrax.net/2016/01/
As a committer of another "dataflow" incubator Taverna, I think this
looks like an exciting proposal.
Agree on the confusion of the name, and it's probably better to get
that sorted early.
In Taverna we have used the term "dataflow" since 2004, and as a
concept the paradigm was created in the 19
Awesome to see CloudDataFlow coming to Apache. The Stream Processing area
has been in general fragmented with a variety of solutions, hoping the
community galvanizes around Apache Data Flow.
We are still in the "Apache Storm" world, Any chance for folks building a
"Storm Runner²?
On 1/20/16, 9:
Hi Seshu,
I blogged about Apache Dataflow proposal:
http://blog.nanthrax.net/2016/01/introducing-apache-dataflow/
You can see in the "what's next ?" section that new runners, skins and
sources are on our roadmap. Definitely, a storm runner could be part of
this.
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2016 0
Hi Supun,
I added you on the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2016 12:37 AM, Supun Kamburugamuve wrote:
We are developing parallel machine learning algorithms for a research
project and are very interested in DataFlow. I would like to contribute to
this project as well. It will be great
- Tsuyoshi
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:38 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal
Hi,
great: I added you in the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:24 AM
Hi Mayank,
sure: you are in.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/22/2016 12:29 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote:
Hi Jean,
Nice Proposal.
I wanted to contribute to this project. Can you please add me too?
Thanks a lot for the help
Thanks,
Mayank
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré mailto:j.
It makes perfect sense, and it's something that we already discussed.
Thanks James and Marvin.
@James, yes, we are going to deal with that together, not a problem at
all. I agree that renaming should happen now.
As discussed, we should be back with a new name early next week.
I'm happy to see
2:38 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal
Hi,
great: I added you in the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:24 AM, Prasanth Jayachandran wrote:
> Hi Jean
>
> I’d be interested in contributing as well.
>
> Thanks
> P
Thank you for such a detailed response Marvin!
Everything you mention makes a lot of sense. Needless to say, we don't want
to squander cycles, break any rules, or throw velocity into disarray all
due to a name.
To that end, I am going to work with JB to amend the proposal with respect
to renaming
We are developing parallel machine learning algorithms for a research
project and are very interested in DataFlow. I would like to contribute to
this project as well. It will be great if you can add me.
Thanks,
Supun...
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Mayank Bansal wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> Nice
Hi Jean,
Nice Proposal.
I wanted to contribute to this project. Can you please add me too?
Thanks a lot for the help
Thanks,
Mayank
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hey Alex,
>
> awesome: I added you on the proposal.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/21/201
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:30 PM, James Malone
wrote:
> If we need to rename, we would ideally choose a new name, change the
> project name at that time, and start our refactoring with that new name. Is
> is acceptable for us to flag a name change as something we need to do as a
> near-term (1st mo
Hi,
it's great to see DataFlow becoming part to Apache ecosystem, thank you
bringing it in.
I would be happy to get involved and help.
--
Alex
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Perfect: done, you are on the proposal.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/21/2016
Hey Alex,
awesome: I added you on the proposal.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 05:03 PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote:
Hi,
it's great to see DataFlow becoming part to Apache ecosystem, thank you
bringing it in.
I would be happy to get involved and help.
--
Alex
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:42 PM
Perfect: done, you are on the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 11:55 AM, chatz wrote:
Charitha Elvitigala
On 21 January 2016 at 16:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Chatz,
sure, what name should I use on the proposal, Charitha ?
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 11:32 AM, chatz wrote
Charitha Elvitigala
On 21 January 2016 at 16:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Chatz,
>
> sure, what name should I use on the proposal, Charitha ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/21/2016 11:32 AM, chatz wrote:
>
>> Hi Jean,
>>
>> I’d be interested in contributing as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Cha
Hi Chatz,
sure, what name should I use on the proposal, Charitha ?
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 11:32 AM, chatz wrote:
Hi Jean,
I’d be interested in contributing as well.
Thanks,
Chatz
On 21 January 2016 at 14:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Sweet: you are on the proposal ;)
Thanks !
Rega
Hi Jean,
I’d be interested in contributing as well.
Thanks,
Chatz
On 21 January 2016 at 14:22, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Sweet: you are on the proposal ;)
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/21/2016 08:55 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
>
>> This looks very interesting. I'm interested in c
Sweet: you are on the proposal ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 08:55 AM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
This looks very interesting. I'm interested in contributing.
Thanks.
-Gon
---
Byung-Gon Chun
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, James Malone <
jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
Hello eve
This looks very interesting. I'm interested in contributing.
Thanks.
-Gon
---
Byung-Gon Chun
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:32 AM, James Malone <
jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a
> unified programmin
I added you on the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 07:36 AM, Hao Chen wrote:
Nice proposal, exactly matches with what we wanna do in some projects,
interested to contribute.
Regards,
Hao
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM, James Malone <
jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
Hell
2016 2:39 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal
Cool ! I added you on the proposal.
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:20 AM, ksobkowiak wrote:
It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be
interested
in contr
Nice proposal, exactly matches with what we wanna do in some projects,
interested to contribute.
Regards,
Hao
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:32 AM, James Malone <
jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a
> un
Pls add me to "Additional Interested Contributors" section too. :-)
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofr� [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:39 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apach
Cool ! I added you on the proposal.
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:20 AM, ksobkowiak wrote:
It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be interested
in contributing too
Regards
Krzysztof
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/D
Hi Hugo,
I added you on the proposal
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:54 AM, Hugo Louro wrote:
Hello everyone,
Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing
to this project from the beginning.
Looking forward to it.
Best,
Hugo
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:24 PM,
Awesome: you are in the proposal ;)
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:55 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
Looking forward, also interested in contributing.
On Jan 20, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Hugo Louro wrote:
Hello everyone,
Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing
to this pr
Hi,
great: I added you in the proposal.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/21/2016 12:24 AM, Prasanth Jayachandran wrote:
Hi Jean
I’d be interested in contributing as well.
Thanks
Prasanth Jayachandran
On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:20 PM, ksobkowiak wrote:
It's a great news the project is going to move t
Wow .. great news!
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
-Original Message-
From: Johan Edstrom [mailto:seij...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 8:56 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal
Looking forward, also interested in
Looking forward, also interested in contributing.
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Hugo Louro wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing
> to this project from the beginning.
>
> Looking forward to it.
>
> Best,
> Hugo
>
> On Wed,
Hello everyone,
Very compelling proposal; congrats! I would be interested in contributing
to this project from the beginning.
Looking forward to it.
Best,
Hugo
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Prasanth Jayachandran <
pjayachand...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Hi Jean
>
> I’d be interested in cont
>
>
> I don't see anything in the proposal about Google ceasing the use of the
> brand
> "Google Cloud Dataflow". Yet the co-existence of "Google Cloud Dataflow"
> and
> "Apache Dataflow" would conflict with Apache requirements for vendor
> neutrality and project independence.
>
> The issue seems
Hi Jean
I’d be interested in contributing as well.
Thanks
Prasanth Jayachandran
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:20 PM, ksobkowiak wrote:
>
> It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be interested
> in contributing too
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in c
It's a great news the project is going to move to Apache. I'd be interested
in contributing too
Regards
Krzysztof
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Dataflow-Incubator-Proposal-tp47985p48025.html
Sent from the Apache Incubator -
Cool: you are on the proposal
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 09:52 PM, Vaibhav Gumashta wrote:
Hi Jean,
I¹d like to contribute as well.
Thanks,
‹Vaibhav
On 1/20/16, 11:19 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
Hey James,
you are on the proposal ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James
Great: you are on the proposal.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 09:00 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
Hello
This is a very interesting proposal and concept. I'd like to contribute.
Thanks
Joe
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James Carman
wrote:
Of course! I'd be happy to help
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 P
Hi Jean,
I¹d like to contribute as well.
Thanks,
‹Vaibhav
On 1/20/16, 11:19 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
>Hey James,
>
>you are on the proposal ;)
>
>Thanks !
>Regards
>JB
>
>On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote:
>> Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 8:32 AM, James Malone
> wrote:
>
> The Dataflow programming model has been designed with simplicity,
> scalability, and speed as key tenants.
s/tenants/tenets?
david jencks
Hello
This is a very interesting proposal and concept. I'd like to contribute.
Thanks
Joe
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> Of course! I'd be happy to help
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> Can I add your to the proposa
Of course! I'd be happy to help
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Can I add your to the proposal ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote:
> > Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be
> happy
> > to c
good proposal, look forward to participating this project contribution.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-Dataflow-Incubator-Proposal-tp47985p48014.html
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com
You are on the proposal ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 08:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
Nice proposal.
I’d be interested in contributing as well. I’m about at my mentor limit with
projects, but I’d be willing to contribute in other/similar ways.
-Taylor
On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:46 PM,
Hey James,
you are on the proposal ;)
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote:
Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be happy
to contribute.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
Hi Sean,
It's a fair point, but no
Nice proposal.
I’d be interested in contributing as well. I’m about at my mentor limit with
projects, but I’d be willing to contribute in other/similar ways.
-Taylor
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Great, I add you in the initial committer list then ;)
>
> I q
Hi James,
Can I add your to the proposal ?
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 07:20 PM, James Carman wrote:
Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be happy
to contribute.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
Hi Sean,
It's a fair point, but not pr
Well, I for one would be very interested in this project and would be happy
to contribute.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:09 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> It's a fair point, but not present in most of the proposals. It's
> something that we can address in the "Community" section.
>
This is great proposal. Been working with Apache Flink for a while so love
to help with this project.
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:32 AM, James Malone <
jamesmal...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Attached to this message is a proposed new project - Apache Dataflow, a
> u
As suggested, I added "Additional Interested Contributors" section, and
already added Debo.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 05:55 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a lar
Yes, you are right, we also know that other companies use dataflow
wording (it's the case at Hortonworks for instance).
We gonna start a thread to propose alternative names.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:41 PM, Gregory Chase wrote:
This is also a similarly named Spring project:
http://cloud.spr
Great, I add you in the initial committer list then ;)
I quickly discussed with James, we gonna create a section for additional
people as proposed by Sean.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:33 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote:
Hi JB
Would love to join now.
regards
debo
On 1/20/16, 9:31 A
Good point Marvin, Google Dataflow SDK will "disappear" for Apache
Dataflow, but you are right, the complete Dataflow "brand" will stay at
Google. Let me double check with James and the team.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:40 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Bapti
This is also a similarly named Spring project:
http://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-dataflow/
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is
> a
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is an
> already known name and "brand".
I don't see anything in the proposal about Google ceasing the use of the brand
"Google Cloud Dataflow". Yet the co-existenc
> Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
> roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a larger
> community. Y'all have any ideas around outreach that will help with
> adoption?
>
Thank you and fair point. We have a few additional ideas which we c
Hi JB
Would love to join now.
regards
debo
On 1/20/16, 9:31 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote:
>Hi Debo,
>
>Awesome: do you want to join now (in the initial committer list) and
>once we are in the incubation ?
>
>Let me know, I can update the proposal.
>
>Regards
>JB
>
>On 01/20/2016 06:23 PM,
Hi Debo,
Awesome: do you want to join now (in the initial committer list) and
once we are in the incubation ?
Let me know, I can update the proposal.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:23 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote:
+1
Proposal looks good. Also a small section on relationships with Apache
Sto
+1
Proposal looks good. Also a small section on relationships with Apache
Storm and Apache Samza would be great.
I would like to sign up, to help/contribute.
debo
On 1/20/16, 8:55 AM, "Sean Busbey" wrote:
>Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
>roadmap, but I don
Hi Marvin,
you raise a point that we have a bit anticipated ;)
We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is
an already known name and "brand".
The naming is not directly related to dataflow programming: it's more
representative of the data flowing inside a pipeline
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:32 AM, James Malone
wrote:
> == Abstract ==
>
> Dataflow is an open source, unified model and set of language-specific SDKs
> for defining and executing data processing workflows, and also data
> ingestion and integration flows, supporting Enterprise Integration Patterns
Hi Sean,
It's a fair point, but not present in most of the proposals. It's
something that we can address in the "Community" section.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 05:55 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
roadmap, but I don't see any goals th
Great proposal. I like that your proposal includes a well presented
roadmap, but I don't see any goals that directly address building a larger
community. Y'all have any ideas around outreach that will help with
adoption?
As a start, I recommend y'all add a section to the proposal on the wiki
page
Hi,
This is a cool idea. Its like Apache TinkerPop
(http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/) but for data flow/stream systems as
opposed to graph systems. Our tag line is "the JDBC for graphs." You would be
"the JDBC for streams." :)
You might be interested in looking TinkerPop's Gremlin langua
Hi all,
I second James there, and really excited to be champion on the project
(and work on the codebase as well).
I blogged about a quick dataflow technical introduction:
http://blog.nanthrax.net/2016/01/introducing-apache-dataflow/
Thanks James !
We are looking forward your feedbacks.
Re
91 matches
Mail list logo
