Good point Marvin, Google Dataflow SDK will "disappear" for Apache
Dataflow, but you are right, the complete Dataflow "brand" will stay at
Google. Let me double check with James and the team.
Regards
JB
On 01/20/2016 06:40 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
We're proposing Apache Dataflow naming because Google Cloud Dataflow is an
already known name and "brand".
I don't see anything in the proposal about Google ceasing the use of the brand
"Google Cloud Dataflow". Yet the co-existence of "Google Cloud Dataflow" and
"Apache Dataflow" would conflict with Apache requirements for vendor
neutrality and project independence.
The issue seems similar to the recent proposal to incubate "Apache OpenMiracl"
while allowing the "Miracl" company to continue distribution of the "Miracl"
project. That situation was was resolved by renaming the Apache project to
"Milagro", allowing the Miracl company to continue benefitting from the brand
they had invested in so heavily.
http://markmail.org/message/tpiphl55rcyezcvd
Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
