RE: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote: > On 31/07/2003 21:32 Ted Leung wrote: > >> On 7/31/2003 9:08 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: >> >>> I think adding folks as committers is fine, but only *active* >>> committers (people who actually vote AND commit code into the code >>> base)

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Steven Noels
On 31/07/2003 21:32 Ted Leung wrote: On 7/31/2003 9:08 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: I think adding folks as committers is fine, but only *active* committers (people who actually vote AND commit code into the code base) should count towards judging vitality. +1 I (joyfully and without bad feeli

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/31/03 4:44 PM, "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31/07/2003 22:39 Ted Leung wrote: >> On 7/31/2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote: >> >>> I (joyfully and without bad feelings) rest my case. Stil do expect me >>> popping up on the list addressing the issues I had in mind when >>> in

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Leung
On 7/31/2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote: I (joyfully and without bad feelings) rest my case. Stil do expect me popping up on the list addressing the issues I had in mind when inviting myself, of course. You are always welcome to do so. After all, the XML PMC will still need to agree w/ the In

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Steven Noels
On 31/07/2003 22:39 Ted Leung wrote: On 7/31/2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote: I (joyfully and without bad feelings) rest my case. Stil do expect me popping up on the list addressing the issues I had in mind when inviting myself, of course. You are always welcome to do so. After all, the XML

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/31/03 1:41 PM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew C. Oliver wrote, On 31/07/2003 18.08: > >> No this did not happen with POI. Stefano was added as a mentor but never >> acted as a committer, > > He had commit access IIRC. Well, it happens most of the time AFAIK that

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Leung
On 7/31/2003 9:08 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: I think adding folks as committers is fine, but only *active* committers (people who actually vote AND commit code into the code base) should count towards judging vitality. +1 - T

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Andrew C. Oliver wrote, On 31/07/2003 18.08: On 7/31/03 10:19 AM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 31/07/2003 16.13: ... AFAIK usually a couple of mentors are added to the committers list. This happened with POI AFAIK for example. I would keep this, as i

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/31/03 10:19 AM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 31/07/2003 16.13: > >> Berin, >> >> Personally, I'm undecided about Steven Noels request to become >> a committer. In the same way that I am a relative unknown to >> you, Steven and Ted are new

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 31/07/2003 16.13: Berin, Personally, I'm undecided about Steven Noels request to become a committer. In the same way that I am a relative unknown to you, Steven and Ted are new acquaintances. In fact, all of the current committers are new acquaintances to me. So my dil

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread kkress
4834 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/30/2003 10:57 PM Please respond to general To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev > From: Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have a question about your reques

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-30 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Part of the Apache Way > is that we admit committers based on their merits. Right now, no one > outside Cliff's list of commiters has submitted a single patch for > XMLBeans. I am uncomfortable with *me* having commit rights to xmlbeans > when I haven't su

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-30 Thread Steven Noels
On 30/07/2003 23:55 Ted Leung wrote: If that means that I need to not have commit privileges, I will happily give them up. I'm not saying that you shouldn't be a committer, I just want to make sure that we understand the precedent(s) that we are setting. Please let me know your thoughts on thi

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-30 Thread berin
> From: Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have a question about your request. The existing ASF people here, > you, me, and some of the interested others are here to help with the > community aspects (among others) of the project. Part of the Apache Way > is that we admit committers based on

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-30 Thread Ted Leung
On 7/30/2003 2:23 PM, Steven Noels wrote: Consider me in, if not content-wise than at least to check on how the project is incubating, and to help on community aspects. In this respect, I respectfully ask to become part of the initial group of committers. Hi Steven, I have a question about y

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-30 Thread Steven Noels
On 30/07/2003 23:05 Ted Leung wrote: Now that the XMLBeans lists are up, I'd invite any interested members of the incubator to subscribe to the lists. Incubation related messages will continue to be sent/copied to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Consider me in, if not content-wise than at least to check on ho