[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 31/07/2003 16.13:
Berin,
Personally, I'm undecided about Steven Noels request to become
a committer. In the same way that I am a relative unknown to
you, Steven and Ted are new acquaintances. In fact, all of the
current committers are new acquaintances to me. So my dilemma is
do I say, "Bring 'em on, the more the merrier" or do I say, "Why
don't we wait until the current committers have bonded before we add someone new." I'm straddling the fence.
I did think that Ted made a good point earlier: The ratio of BEA to non-BEA committers is high and adding committers at this point could be interpreted as "padding".
I'd love to hear how the other committers feel. Perhaps that will tip me to one side or the other.
AFAIK usually a couple of mentors are added to the committers list. This happened with POI AFAIK for example.
I would keep this, as it helps by example (not on code necessarily but at least about how to manage things), and makes it possible to have more active oversight to the CVS codebase.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
