On 7/31/03 4:44 PM, "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 31/07/2003 22:39 Ted Leung wrote: >> On 7/31/2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote: >> >>> I (joyfully and without bad feelings) rest my case. Stil do expect me >>> popping up on the list addressing the issues I had in mind when >>> inviting myself, of course. >> >> >> You are always welcome to do so. After all, the XML PMC will still need >> to agree w/ the Incubator PMC that exit criteria have been achieved. > > ... which, some time ago, I mentioned as transcribed on the bottom of > http://cocoon.apache.org/incubation.html as "They leave incubation when > they feel that they are ready to defend their exit intentions when > needed." ;-) > > Of course, a clear-cut and listed set of goals to achieve would be much > better. > > </Steven> With Tapestry the easiest way that I interpreted this this was with a tricameral vote. Incubator PMC, Tapestry and Jakarta PMC. I tried to find justification in this. The main country that I could find with a tricameral system was Poland although it has since abandoned it. The other example I decided would be in poor taste to mention as it was on racial lines. -andy -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
