In a discussion [1] on private@streams started on 7/5/17 there was strong
support from PPMC including 3 mentors for the proposed charter. PPMC members
not proposed for PMC had a chance to request they be added to proposed PMC, but
none did.
We plan to push forward and start a VOTE on the matt
To Dave’s question about participation, I believe that’s correct. The PPMC
members who are not proposed for the PMC have all been wholly inactive for at
least year.
To Dave’s question about commit rights, as a podling we never added any
non-PPMC committers, so I personally think it’s appropriat
So I just went back through the archives. I think I share Dave's concerns
about notifying. It looks like the incubator list was the first place the
proposed resolution was shared. Would be good to put in front of the
private@streams list make sure no one has any concerns with it.
John
On Wed,
Thanks for clarifying. Does this list correspond to those who have participated
with commits and project work in the last 6 months or year who are PPMC members
or committers? Will you continue to allow all current committers to have commit
rights once you go to TLP?
My concern is anyone losing
As the PPMC member encouraged to draft the resolution, that was the condition I
decided to apply, after running it by a few others from the community
out-of-band. There was no email thread on the topic, so using the definition
that decisions must be made on the list, this wasn’t a group decisio
Hi Steve,
Where was that decision made? I don’t see that recently in Pony Mail archives.
I don’t see anything wrong with decision I just don’t see any record of it.
Please let us know when it was made and how it was recorded.
Regards,
Dave
> On Jul 5, 2017, at 12:33 PM, sblackmon wrote:
>
>
John,
We decided to propose only PPMC members who voted +1 to the graduation
resolution for the PMC. If that left out anyone harboring a latent plan to
re-engage with the project community, and they let us know on dev@streams, we’d
be happy to add their names onto the resolution.
Steve
On
Hi Steve,
Thanks for drafting this. I see there's a big difference between the
listed PPMC and the proposed PMC. I'm assuming you've reached out to those
excluded and confirmed they're not interested in Streams any longer?
John
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:48 PM sblackmon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The
Hello,
The Streams PPMC has discussed [1] and voted [2] to graduate to TLP.
In preparation for an IPMC vote on the matter, we’ve updated our project status
xml [3] and corresponding whimsy podlingStatus [4], completed an Apache
Maturity Model Assessment [5], and drafted a proposed charter [6].
