Thanks for clarifying. Does this list correspond to those who have participated with commits and project work in the last 6 months or year who are PPMC members or committers? Will you continue to allow all current committers to have commit rights once you go to TLP?
My concern is anyone losing merit even if it has been a few years. People come and go. Sometimes people come back after being absent for a couple of years. One aspect at Apache is that merit does not expire. (I am part of OpenOffice where we went from a huge PPMC to a large PMC on graduation so I feel what you are doing is legitimate.) Regards, Dave > On Jul 5, 2017, at 1:19 PM, sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: > > As the PPMC member encouraged to draft the resolution, that was the condition > I decided to apply, after running it by a few others from the community > out-of-band. There was no email thread on the topic, so using the definition > that decisions must be made on the list, this wasn’t a group decision, it was > an action by me. > > Sorry for the confusion. > > Steve > On July 5, 2017 at 2:45:50 PM, Dave Fisher (dave2w...@comcast.net > <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>) wrote: > >> Hi Steve, >> >> Where was that decision made? I don’t see that recently in Pony Mail >> archives. I don’t see anything wrong with decision I just don’t see any >> record of it. Please let us know when it was made and how it was recorded. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> > On Jul 5, 2017, at 12:33 PM, sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > John, >> > >> > We decided to propose only PPMC members who voted +1 to the graduation >> > resolution for the PMC. If that left out anyone harboring a latent plan to >> > re-engage with the project community, and they let us know on dev@streams, >> > we’d be happy to add their names onto the resolution. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > On July 5, 2017 at 2:12:53 PM, John D. Ament (johndam...@apache.org) wrote: >> > >> > Hi Steve, >> > >> > Thanks for drafting this. I see there's a big difference between the >> > listed PPMC and the proposed PMC. I'm assuming you've reached out to those >> > excluded and confirmed they're not interested in Streams any longer? >> > >> > John >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:48 PM sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> The Streams PPMC has discussed [1] and voted [2] to graduate to TLP. >> >> >> >> In preparation for an IPMC vote on the matter, we’ve updated our project >> >> status xml [3] and corresponding whimsy podlingStatus [4], completed an >> >> Apache Maturity Model Assessment [5], and drafted a proposed charter [6]. >> >> >> >> We’d appreciate any feedback you can provide at this stage to help ensure >> >> the project has all bases covered to become a successful Apache TLP. >> >> >> >> Thank you for your consideration. >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/64738d9382b094bb52a733e7d44f5497eecc04fae4255366abc0270b@ >> >> <dev.streams.apache.org> >> >> [2] >> >> >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cd17d49769b85a8cda14cd16624032c0ddb02e8e707545082c5fc893@ >> >> <dev.streams.apache.org> >> >> [3] >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/streams.html >> >> [4] >> >> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/streams#podlingStatus >> >> [5] >> >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+Streams >> >> [6] >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMS/Proposed+Charter >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
