So I just went back through the archives. I think I share Dave's concerns about notifying. It looks like the incubator list was the first place the proposed resolution was shared. Would be good to put in front of the private@streams list make sure no one has any concerns with it.
John On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:26 PM Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > Thanks for clarifying. Does this list correspond to those who have > participated with commits and project work in the last 6 months or year who > are PPMC members or committers? Will you continue to allow all current > committers to have commit rights once you go to TLP? > > My concern is anyone losing merit even if it has been a few years. People > come and go. Sometimes people come back after being absent for a couple of > years. One aspect at Apache is that merit does not expire. > > (I am part of OpenOffice where we went from a huge PPMC to a large PMC on > graduation so I feel what you are doing is legitimate.) > > Regards, > Dave > > On Jul 5, 2017, at 1:19 PM, sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: > > As the PPMC member encouraged to draft the resolution, that was the > condition I decided to apply, after running it by a few others from the > community out-of-band. There was no email thread on the topic, so using > the definition that decisions must be made on the list, this wasn’t a group > decision, it was an action by me. > > Sorry for the confusion. > > Steve > > On July 5, 2017 at 2:45:50 PM, Dave Fisher (dave2w...@comcast.net) wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > Where was that decision made? I don’t see that recently in Pony Mail > archives. I don’t see anything wrong with decision I just don’t see any > record of it. Please let us know when it was made and how it was recorded. > > > Regards, > Dave > > > On Jul 5, 2017, at 12:33 PM, sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > John, > > > > We decided to propose only PPMC members who voted +1 to the graduation > resolution for the PMC. If that left out anyone harboring a latent plan to > re-engage with the project community, and they let us know on dev@streams, > we’d be happy to add their names onto the resolution. > > > > Steve > > > > On July 5, 2017 at 2:12:53 PM, John D. Ament (johndam...@apache.org) > wrote: > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > Thanks for drafting this. I see there's a big difference between the > > listed PPMC and the proposed PMC. I'm assuming you've reached out to > those > > excluded and confirmed they're not interested in Streams any longer? > > > > John > > > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:48 PM sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> The Streams PPMC has discussed [1] and voted [2] to graduate to TLP. > >> > >> In preparation for an IPMC vote on the matter, we’ve updated our project > > >> status xml [3] and corresponding whimsy podlingStatus [4], completed an > > >> Apache Maturity Model Assessment [5], and drafted a proposed charter > [6]. > >> > >> We’d appreciate any feedback you can provide at this stage to help > ensure > >> the project has all bases covered to become a successful Apache TLP. > >> > >> Thank you for your consideration. > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/64738d9382b094bb52a733e7d44f5497eecc04fae4255366abc0270b@ > >> <dev.streams.apache.org> > >> [2] > >> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cd17d49769b85a8cda14cd16624032c0ddb02e8e707545082c5fc893@ > > >> <dev.streams.apache.org> > >> [3] > >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/streams.html > >> [4] > >> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/streams#podlingStatus > >> [5] > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+Streams > > >> [6] > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMS/Proposed+Charter > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >
