On Tue, Sep 15, 2015, at 03:56 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> This is a vote for Calcite to become a top-level project.
>
> Since joining the Incubator in May, 2014, the Calcite
> community has:
> * Produced eight IPMC-approved releases under two release
> managers;
> * Added five new committers and
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014, at 05:57 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Calcite 0.9.2 (incubating).
>
> Proposal:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-calcite-dev/201411.mbox/%3CCAMCtme%2BV1wG%3Dqzsht_15p1-
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating).
>
> This will be the second release since the project entered incubation in
> May 2014 as Optiq, and the first under the ne
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014, at 12:34 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Optiq community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Optiq 0.9.0 (incubating). This would be the first release of the
> Apache Optiq project inside the Incubator.
>
> Pursuant to the Releases section of t
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014, at 03:21 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> I would like to propose Optiq as an Apache Incubator project. I have
> posted the proposal to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OptiqProposal
> and
> posted the text of the proposal below.
>
> Ashutosh.
Given the importance of Optiq f
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014, at 10:44 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from
> the
> incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made
> three
> releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 08:53 AM, Stack wrote:
> +1
>
> (Promoting my phoenix dev list +1 here)
+1
(ditto)
Keep up the great work.
Steven.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comm
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014, at 10:40 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
+1 (binding)
Doing great, Phoenix team!
Steven.
Marvin,
same here - my user name for the Incubator Wiki is StevenNoels
Thanks!
Steven.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014, at 03:38 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:30 PM, lars hofhansl wrote:
> > Belated +1 from me as well.
>
> Thanks, I've added it.
>
> For future reference, what's
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Stack wrote:
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
> posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
>
> Let us now move to a vote.
>
> Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
>
> [] +1 Accept Phoenix into the Incub
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:43 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Phoenix, a
> SQL layer over HBase, initially developed at Salesforce.com and
> subsequently open sourced on github
> (https://github.com/forcedotcom/phoenix). Instead of us
ntext.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought Open Source Java & XML
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
And they do -- their software :)
Sorry to say, but: big deal. Compare that with the value of the ASF
brand for the donating entity. Lines of code are a side-effect of
developer team-work, and it's much more difficult to grow a team and a
brand than to actually code
too soon. That way, we'll burn out rather than fade away. :)
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought Open Source Java & XML
stevenn at outerthought.org
ng
innovation?
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought Open Source Java & XML
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org
-
To
On 02 Sep 2005, at 06:53, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Why is it just us catching the flak?
Because we feel you're one of us, rather than one of "them". Look at it
as a token of ultimate appreciation.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.or
in
their
fiefdom.
Someone should triple-check that a project consists of people rather
than industry consortia players.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought Open Source Java & XML
stevenn at outerthought
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache
On 18 May 2005, at 18:10, Doug Cutting wrote:
I believe that Nutch has met all of the requirements for graduation.
Nutch has an active, diverse developer community. The Lucene PMC has
voted to accept Nutch.
+1
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought
On 07 May 2005, at 00:51, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Dear Incubator PMC :
We, the sponsoring members listed below, ask that you accept the
following proposal for a new project at Apache, an effort centered
around architecting and implementing J2SE 5.
+1
--
Steven Noels
committers. However, I feel that even a cursory look at the log4cxx
mailing lists, in particular the quality of the exchanges held there,
should alleviate some of Noel's those fears.
+1 from me as well (slacking because of holiday season)
--
Steven Noels
On 05 Jan 2005, at 08:08, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Doug proposed this a week and change ago (bad timing to do such things
around major holidays :-)). So far we have support from Dain, Nicola
Ken,
Doug, Eric Hatcher, Henning, Roy and myself.
+1 here as well
--
Steven Noels
a non-public
mailing list, and I'm sure anyone on that list is ready & willing to
address case-by-case issues.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://b
On 18 Oct 2004, at 02:19, thorsten wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
Nope. What Thorsten describes looks pretty bad IMO, so I want to know
what is going on. Otherwise, this shouldn't have been posted at all.
No need to keep the dust under the carpet. And if Thorsten doesn't
want to go publ
past.
I hope my contributions to this thread are not misinterpreted.
I don't think so and they are appreciated. But I'm not sure this will
lead us anywhere if Thorsten doesn't speak factually. I've quite had it
with the amount of FUD mails making waves on various Apache lists
lost and wondering what you are _really_ talking about. Speak freely
and your voice will be heard. We're all here to learn.
(and imagine yourself being an outsider reading this thread: how would
you read it? what would you think of the incubator, or the ASF as a
whole?)
--
ously: how
would such "power" lay in the hands of mentors? Isn't someone supposed
to disregard such pushy politics, whatever their origin is?
But first and foremost, I'd like to know if and where this has been
happening - because you seem to suggest so.
--
Steven Noels
7;s only a few
(2?) of the independent PMC members who are demonstrating continued
involvement with the project. Aren't there any other candidate
committers to be on the PMC?
Aah - a flurry of new folks being (self-)proposed on the lists. ;-)
--
Steven Noelsht
pects. I'm still a bit doubtful whether "functional" apps
are suited for ASF adoption (I have a personal preference towards spec
implementations, libraries and frameworks), but I guess only Darwin has
the final say about this.
--
Steven Noelshttp://o
;situation" with the Cocoon
fork of Rhino of mozilla.org.
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236108
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.co
On 23 Aug 2004, at 06:52, Clinton Begin wrote:
[ ] Accept iBATIS into the Incubator
(late) +1
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/ste
ich might help you to recruit some sponsors and/or
interested developers.
HTH,
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/steven
On 18 Aug 2004, at 06:31, Simon Kitching wrote:
To members of the incubator PMC: now would be a good time to speak up
if
you disagree with anything I've said!
No way: you're doing perfectly fine. Thanks!
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthou
ting-eager than what we have seen in the
past.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org
good intersection of ASF folks
dealing with incubation directly, rather than reasoning about
incubation rules in general.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://bl
On 09 Jul 2004, at 03:44, David Blevins wrote:
I really don't want to get caught in the cross-fire, but...you could
call each other up and talk/yell this out on the phone and get the
argument over quickly.
+1, but some people just *need* the audience, alas. ;-)
(now i'm really gone)
many
of the actors would stay on stage. The funniest things happen when
people take themselves too seriously.
(I'm a few hours away from going on holidays, so bear my poetic
tendencies ATM.)
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java
at a good portion of the
inhabitants of this list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
this flamefest. At least I am not, and I can imagine that neither
general@ nor [EMAIL PROTECTED] are to be bothered with thread fallout debris
like this. It ain't fun nor educ
On 19 Jun 2004, at 03:59, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
[X] +1 - The XMLBeans project has met the requirements
for incubation and will be recommended to the
board for TLP status
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java &
On 17 Jun 2004, at 21:11, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
[X] Yes, allow Lenya to put out a clearly marked incubation
distribution
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog at
On 14 Jun 2004, at 23:07, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see one or two quantitative rules (such as one
about independent committers to allow for vetoes)
IMHO, that would be a requirement for projects prior to *entering* the
incubator.
--
Steven
our subtle hint and agree with what you say about
yourself. ;-)
Frankly: it is because of this apparent shift in attitude that I'm
feeling Lenya is finally getting ready.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLA
xying back- and forward, and this
becomes very boring after a while - at the verge of starting to think
people are dispassionate about incubation status.
Sorry,
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Membe
On 14 Jun 2004, at 12:02, Michael Wechner wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
Lenya has an awkward history IMHO. It has been force-fed into the
bowls of the ASF upon the idea that a community was more important
than code, and because of pet-peeves of people: the ASF needed a CMS
project, and Lenya would
gonal
reasonings into a single mail. Let me try to clarify my position so
that we can move on.
Fair warning: this message is likely to come across as harsh. That is
NOT
directed at you.
No worries, mate. I've been through worse, and I know you have good
intentions. ;-)
Steven Noels wro
On 12 Jun 2004, at 11:04, Rolf Kulemann wrote:
Hello Lenya Mentors and Incubators,
the Lenya community wants to perform a release (while being under
incubation).
+1 on the release
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java &
e more external contributors to help them with this effort.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org
ear. This shows
(to me) that Lenya is becoming independent from Wyona, and is a much
clearer indication of meeting incubation exit criteria than counting
committers beans.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLA
On 31 May 2004, at 13:15, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
This started off from a comment from Noel, but I'd also be kinda
interested in whether any of these projects can be graduated and/or
shut down?
Even more interestingly, we should put the incubation start date next
to this.
--
Steven
a PPMC composed of these two
Apache members, the other Beehive committers, and any Incubator
PMC member who is interested in helping guide the project.
I'll be looking from the side as I do with XMLBeans.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open S
with what intentions, and your ambitions towards
incubation? More people than this incubator list need to know your
stuff exists before a community may eventually form.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Ori
erces."
[ runs quickly away to put another coat of paint on the bikeshed ]
LOL (sorry for that)
I was thinking I was just reading a longish mailing list thread - but
this is becoming a Go game, actually. A pity there's only two colors in
that.
--
Steven Noels
bly backed/vetoed by interested Incubator/receiving PMC peeps,
should be enough as a 'formalization' of the process.
WDYT?
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog at
e-cases and business customer requirements are hard to
fit into a design that appeals to framework and tools geeks, since they
are bound to have a different view on the design of such apps, partly
due to the NIH-syndrome, but also because business customer-facing
design decisions are largely ar
omeone who
helps out everywhere, but has no *formal* responsibility.
It's a read well-worth it. Congratulations, Stephen and Berin. I'm
slowly starting to believe in this concept.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java &
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
It's about having an "elder" shepherd mentoring the main shepherd, and
possibly requiring at least two people helping in Incubation.
What do others think about this?
Over-regulation.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.or
ondering if Cocoon is the right place for
them, as I've not seen much involvment. I'll wait and see, but for now I
would not vote for exit as there is not much integration.
As a member of the Cocoon, or Incubator PMC?
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Ou
ys is that candidate podlings should
carefully consider whether they are an infrastructural/technological
framework, or a functional/user-use-case application. I believe the ASF
has better nurturing grounds for the former, rather than the latter.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outert
I read you correct in saying that the receiving PMC has no chance
anymore to declare an incubation failed, if the Incubator PMC says the
contrary? In that case (and I hope I'm wrong), why is the receiving PMC
involved then?
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Oute
ia, though, since somewhere in time,
we will be expected to judge the incubation state of Lenya.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/steve
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
On Sunday, Sep 21, 2003, at 08:18 Europe/Rome, Steven Noels wrote:
... but not every PMC chair is a member (i.e. myself). Things can get
quite funny, that way. It seems like there's some cracks in the
Matrix.
It might look, admittedly, strange that an ASF officer i
Beans through then. Nice to know!
(which, BTW, doesn't say I'm unhappy with the people involved in the
current XMLBeans incubation - quite the contrary)
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Membe
seems like there's some cracks in the Matrix.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.orgs
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
I just want to say that this requirement of sponsors which should be
members was totally unclear to me when I started talking and working
with the BEA peeps (Cliff Schmidt). So even if this was meant to be by
design, it wasn't very obvious
ted in Lenya's incubation,
please don't forget that some people don't spend much energy on the
public visibility of their actions.
Oh BTW: the people (aka sponsors) that brought Lenya to ASF are Stefano
& Nicola, IIRC. That was before all this incubation
time, something which I greatly
appreciated. Still, if I would have known this before, I might have been
looking for a sponsor sooner.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XMLAn Orixo Member
Read my weblog at
Sascha-Matthias Kulawik wrote:
No, it is also in our interest, you're right :) It is a little bit of
"we want to give the community something back", something of
"reputation", some interest of good ideas of other developers and so on.
The primary work area for incubating ASF projects should be the
James Strachan wrote:
Though there's no reason, given some hardware and a volunteer, why we
couldn't install JIRA at Apache.
+1
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at
On 1/08/2003 10:32 Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Have taken the xml charter and hacked around a bit. There is a lot more
required, but I reckon it's a fair starting point.
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?IncubatorCharterDraft
Thanks for a brilliant starting point.
--
Steven
to.jar file a Show Stopper for Charon?
- If it is a show-stopper, how come it is ok for jetspeed-2 to have this dependency?
Out of curiosity: what's the specific problem with pluto.jar? Who is
still discussing stuff with lawyers (IIUC)?
--
Steven Noelshttp:
to.jar file a Show Stopper for Charon?
- If it is a show-stopper, how come it is ok for jetspeed-2 to have this dependency?
Out of curiosity: what's the specific problem with pluto.jar? Who is
still discussing stuff with lawyers (IIUC)?
--
Steven Noelshttp:
On 1/08/2003 10:32 Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Have taken the xml charter and hacked around a bit. There is a lot more
required, but I reckon it's a fair starting point.
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?IncubatorCharterDraft
Thanks for a brilliant starting point.
--
Steven
feelings) rest my case. Stil do expect me
popping up on the list addressing the issues I had in mind when inviting
myself, of course.
Cheers!
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblo
On 31/07/2003 22:39 Ted Leung wrote:
On 7/31/2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote:
I (joyfully and without bad feelings) rest my case. Stil do expect me
popping up on the list addressing the issues I had in mind when
inviting myself, of course.
You are always welcome to do so. After all, the XML
ipate in discussions, and
can cast real votes, even can become member of our PMC. I know I'm
freaking out people describing such a hideous situation, but it works
rather well over there. ;-)
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, J
ck on how the
project is incubating, and to help on community aspects.
In this respect, I respectfully ask to become part of the initial group
of committers.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Cente
tches if you see something that needs changing. The fastest way
to get commit to *any* ASF project is to post so many patches to
the development list that the committers can't keep up and eventually
just give you direct access. :)
I'm fully aware of all that. I'm not a
bator PMC is responsible for
doing any actual incubation work, except for setting out the guidelines.
Pardon me, but if they fail in doing that, and in the mean time prove to
be counterproductive by shielding away documents from people who are
actually helping incubati
ng to
that location, unless others have different opinions.
'There', 'that'...? Could you elaborate please?
Where can it be found, then?
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Sup
On 30/07/2003 0:13 Michael Wechner wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
If it comes to (a) vote(s), anybody's opinion is appreciated, so
please speak up. Binding votes about the Cocoon guidelines can be cast
by Cocoon committers only - the original members of the 'founding' PMC
tha
On 29/07/2003 10:41 Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
and see to bring XMLBeans where people can actually help them out.
Apart from Nicola's apparent efforts in keeping the Incubator alive,
most of the real action is done by infrastructure peeps, and the
dispersed shepher
ive, most of
the real action is done by infrastructure peeps, and the dispersed
shepherds of incubating projects, most of them assumably under the
umbrella of the XML/Jakarta PMC. Let's keep it that way, and keep the
incubating projects close to an active PMC.
--
Steven Noels
VOTE, man. ;-)
Other before me voted :-)
That wasn't a vote, but fractional enthusiasm. :-)
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/steven
as a form for this as well, but I cannot locate it anymore
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at
ted onto a
single set of incubation- lists, I'm pretty sure people would be very
quickly annoyed.
Other than that: enthusiastic +0.75.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog
LGPL Piccolo
issue is resolved, it seems like we're heading somewhere. Attracting new
committers is easier when the project is already under incubation.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
to migrate everything to Apache. Presumably in
that time they are also getting used to Apache and can develop an
understanding of where they feel their project fits best.
Not jumping to any conclusion, I'm very happy to see a positive and
constructive discussion happening. Thanks, all.
o the
survival of the project after 'graduation'.
Just my 0.02 EUR, if any Lenyatic wants to chime in, please do.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at
On 3/06/2003 18:26 Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
You'll have to learn to walk the gauntlet of flames and survive of course,
but I've no doubt you'll make it ;-)
Ditto: your persistent care in communicating your course of actions is
duly noted & very much appreciated
+1
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache
course.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache
On 1/04/2003 22:03 Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator.
:-D
Nice one!
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my
=1606
is what should be changed in the LGPL, also read
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1429
for some further info.
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Licensing summarizes most,
if not fully up-to-date however.
--
Steven Noels
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
i'll probably nudge this mailing list up to a nice respectable
traffic volume with my unsolicited opinions and out-of-date clewless
remarks. :-)
looking forward to them :-)
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought -
community. This might be expedited by an attractive
codebase with a sound architecture.
Gee - there's a certain sense of Ruby-ism in this reply. :-D
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Cente
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Steven Noels wrote, On 25/02/2003 10.28:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
As stated before, I'm sponsoring the proposal, so here's my +1.
OTOH, who or what will trigger/endorse the transition from incubation
to proper subproject? Cocoon PMC or Incubation PMC?
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
As stated before, I'm sponsoring the proposal, so here's my +1.
OTOH, who or what will trigger/endorse the transition from incubation to
proper subproject? Cocoon PMC or Incubation PMC?
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Ou
good community around
it, so here is my (informal) +1 to this incubation, together with a
personal commitment to follow closely this project and help wherever I can.
I'm glad to see you jump up as well.
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open
e
required reading if you want to learn more about Forrest (oh yes, there
were times we had more docs than features in Forrest, since most of the
Forrest committers really dig pointy brackets :-)
Could you point us to a similar entry-level overview of Lenya? Or
sitemaps we need
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
[extensive snipage]
Steven Noels wrote:
You know how I run communities and what are the things I value. Michael,
who is the technical leader, resonates with my vision a lot and has been
playing very nicely with Cocoon.
Please, I don't see why you need to d
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
