Marshall Schor wrote:
Please cast your vote:
[x] +1 to recommend UIMA's graduation
congratulations!
-jean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@i
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I have sent an e-mail directly to everyone who is officially on the
Incubator PMC. If you did NOT receive that e-mail, and believe that you
should be on the PMC, please notify me, via e-mail here.
I didn't receive one -- and I also checked my apache.org email, spam
fil
Greg Stein wrote:
Hello all,
I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for
Subversion's graduation. ...
Please vote:
[x] +1 Graduation
[ ] -1 Hold, and continue incubating
cheers,
-jean
-
To unsubs
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Hi general@,
I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
terrific idea!
+1
-jean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comman
those all down, Eddie.
I don't spot any problems, so my +1 stands.
-jean
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Eddie Epstein wrote:
Hi Jean,
Just noting that uimacpp does include rat reports, just poorly named :(
In
http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-re
be
good to confirm.
thanks,
-jean
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
since I reviewed the earliest uima releases I went ahead and reviewed this
one.
I did not take the time to unpack files and examine them because I was
convinced by early release rounds that the UIMA
since I reviewed the earliest uima releases I went ahead and reviewed
this one.
I did not take the time to unpack files and examine them because I was
convinced by early release rounds that the UIMA project knows how to do
this reliably.
I did focus on the rat reports that were included and
+1
-jean
Greg Stein wrote:
Subversion is a version control system. You probably know it well as
it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software
Foundation.
The Subversion project would like to join the Apache Software
Foundation to remove the overhead of having to run its o
+1
-jean
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
PMC and others,
Lokahi's community has collapsed long time ago and albeit Noel's
repeated efforts to create interest around the project, there is no
signs of any improvement.
I am therefor calling a vote to mothball/pause the project. Please
place your votes.
[
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This thread really needs to be put to a conclusion as policy and procedure. On
the table we have:
Suspension would include:
-- disable the mailing lists (no need to moderate)
-- disable commit access (no need to review changes)
-- change the index of projects
The
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In August 2008, it was discussed that XAP had been inactive for at least 4
months. In November 2008, we again saw issues with XAP and discussed
suspension. Having reached, now, February 2009, and still nothing with XAP,
I am raising this as a vote.
--- Noel
David Crossley wrote:
...
For example, some key parts of its puzzle are
developed by Japanese people. Other parts by
English-speaking people. Some of these people
can read/write English, but others are not
at all comfortable.
...
Does anyone here have some tips for conducting
an open developme
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Gang,
Sorry, I didn't realize that SubTasks would still go to the general@ list...
Hmmm...
All those JIRA notices are a good thing -- lets folks review the tasks
making it into the queue (and keeps folks aware of tasks in general,
even if they aren't interested in the
+1
-jean
Craig L Russell wrote:
While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that
there has been no recent action on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72
An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which currently
confuses the role of the PPMC and the
+1
-jean
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
---
Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the
vote email with a cover statement that this vote i
+1 and best wishes,
-jean
ant elder wrote:
After 29 months in the incubator, 19 releases, 25 new committers, and
tons of emails the Apache Tuscany community (with support from our
mentors) again feels that we are ready to graduate to an official top
level project at Apache as indicated by the c
ht be incomplete -- it'd be good to improve the existing
docs.
at any rate, I responded to that specific question.
-jean
-- dims
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SH
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
So, am trying to follow up on some threads i started in other lists.
Do we have already have a list of duties of PMC
members?
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html
also, lots of resource links are listed here:
http:
Michael Baessler wrote:
The Apache UIMA project ask the Apache Incubator PMC for permission to publish
the
first UIMA Sandbox annotator release. The UIMA Sandbox is place for
contributions from the community
and hosts components like annotators (UIMA analysis components) and tooling
around UIM
sebb wrote:
On 15/12/2007, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
contributions from IBM:
"Software Grant License Agreement", informally known as the
"IBM UIMA License Agreement&quo
resend from an email that won't need moderation (sorry for the dup).
sebb wrote:
> On 15/12/2007, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
>>> contribu
1 checksums have the same problem.
The PGP signatures are OK, however the format of the existing MD5/SHA1
files means that most (all?) checking programs will have difficulty
verifying the checksums.
I think these problems need to be corrected before release (if
necessary by editting the files)
O
I reviewed the rat reports, checked the asc signatures, did a cursory
review of DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE files in a couple of the src
and bin files, and it all looks good to me.
+1
btw, the way you provide the rat reports up front is *very* helpful.
-jean
Michael Baessler wrote:
The
Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ x] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
cheers,
-jean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
New IP clearance form uploaded for component mentioned in the subject.
Let us know if there's any issue.
Due to permission issues I could not "svn up" the website. Therefore,
please see the SVN revision here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=598886
I did
+1 !
-jean
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:03:16 +, "Robert Burrell Donkin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the
> incubator
>
> - robert
>
> --8<
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Should Ivy be allowed to graduate as an Ant Subproject?
>
> [x] Yes
> [ ] No
yes, +1, and congratulations!
-jean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
this looks good to me,
+1
-jean
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> The UIMA developers ask the Incubator PMC for permission to
> publish a new release of UIMA, the second in the incubator.
> This release contains many incremental changes and
> improvements, please see the release notes for an exhaustive
> l
dropping [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the cc
Gilles Scokart wrote:
> I'm a commiter for ivy, but I didn't manage to subscribe to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I tried with my gmail address 2 times, and with my apache address.
> Every time I answered to the mail asking me to confirm
+1
-jean
Paul Fremantle wrote:
> $subject says it all.
>
> Here is my +1
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
-jean
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:15:54 +0800, "J Aaron Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>
> This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
> 'retired' status.
>
> Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to
> make another attempt at incubating an Op
Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On May 30, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Carl,
>>>
>>> On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>>>
>>>> One more questi
Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
>> One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views
>> from different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and who can
>> not send the account setup mail to root?"
>>
>> Given each
+1
-jean
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Dear Incubator,
>
> The Wicket podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
> its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending
> the attached draft board resolution.
>
> The vote will end in 72 hours, 1900 hours CET sunday 27-May-
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html now has a
> reasonable quantity of content. the organisation could probably be
> improved, some necessary content has probably been missed and more
> proof reading would be good. so, this is a good time to post the dr
Craig L Russell wrote:
> I have a slightly different view of this.
>
> The phrase "I survived the Incubator" and "all I got was this lousy T-
> shirt" seem incongruous, and combining them doesn't quite work. "I
> survived..." stands alone.
>
> And I agree with Noel that the survival meme isn't q
Craig L Russell wrote:
...
> [x] +1 Recommend to the board to establish Apache OpenJPA
-jean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brett Porter wrote:
> After the previous discussion, the proposal has been amended to
> include the new wording. We will restart the vote.
>
> Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal.
+1
best wishes,
-jean
--
Michael Dick wrote:
> I'm fairly new here, but I can't find a list of the IPMC members online.
it's here:
http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
regards,
-jean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Incubator PMC,
>
> The Trinidad community believes that Trinidad is ready for graduation, as
> evidenced by this vote (see [1]).
>
> We would like to initiate a vote to graduate to be a subproject of the
> Apache MyFaces project.
+1
best wishes,
-jean
--
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Brian McCallister wrote:
>
>>I think wadi withdrew from incubation. It seems
>>alive here: http://wadi.codehaus.org/
>
> Correct.
>
> +1 to formally retire it.
+1
-jean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
I had recalled this being discussed before [1] because Cayenne had a
mentor who was not a member.
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jul 2006:
> Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
>> What do you mean fix the doc? Is it not the policy that mentors be
>> members? I've seen and been involved
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Martin Ritchie wrote:
>
>>Thanks for this discussion. So just to clarify, anyone on the PPMC can
>>request the account/karma setup just the IPMC needs to be CC'd as well
>>as the usual PPMC on the root email.
>
> infra only acknowledges requests from the PMC chair (
+1
-jean
Marshall Schor wrote:
> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release
> org.apache.uima.desceditor.2.1.0.incubating-hotfix-1.zip .
> We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> approve this "hotfix" release.
>
> This release consists of 1 zip file containing a replacement for one o
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Paul McMahan wrote:
>
>>consensus if no -1 votes are cast within the next 48 hours.
>
> The convention is 72 hours; three days is a constant factor that
> accounts for weekends and other real-life issue.
The 48 hours comes from step 7 in the ip clearance template:
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Two parts to the vote:
>
> ONE: Should Incubator tarballs go in the normal place (and thus mirrors).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
0
> TWO: Should there be an Incubator maven repository.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
0
I'm straddling the fence because I can see valid arguments for both si
Overall the release looks good to me. I verified the *.asc signatures
and looked more closely at uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz .
I noticed just one thing that struck me as odd in the user
documentation. The "UIMA Documentation Overview" in
uima-docbooks/src/index.html includes an IBM copyright
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Day Management AG has contributed a set of "bundle persistence
>> manager" components to Apache Jackrabbit:
>>
>> - The code was uploaded to Jira issue JCR-755. [1]
>> - The Jackrabbit vote to accep
Marshall Schor wrote:
> While going thru some code and changing old-style Apache license headers
> to new style ones, a scan
> showed that the Apache license, itself, has a section near the bottom,
> where it says
>
> APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
>
> and then goes on to
Adam Lally wrote:
> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release version
> 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> approve this release.
>
> Release artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~alally/uima-2.1.0-incubating/
> ...
I reviewed the uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.ta
Leo Simons wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>> Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> ...
>>> I "vetoed" the codedump for two main reasons. The first is that the IP
>>> clearance process is not being followed: there is no r
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:20:13 -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> IBM has contributed system tests to Apache Derby:
>
> - The ASF secretary recorded the software grant in cclas.txt.
> - The code was uploaded to Jir
A few more comments
The proposed changes are quite specific about exactly how to vote in a
new ppmc member (including subject lines for how to discuss, vote and
deliver results). I wonder if that's really necessary or if more general
guideline might be appropriate and let the PPMC work out th
IBM has contributed system tests to Apache Derby:
- The ASF secretary recorded the software grant in cclas.txt.
- The code was uploaded to Jira issue DERBY-2248. [1]
- The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site. [2]
- The Derby vote to accept the contribution passed. [3]
If there a
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I've added a new IP clearance document:
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/ip-clearance/xmlgraphics-commons-postscript-dsc-parser.html?view=co
> (SVN URL for the lack of karma to update the incubator website.)
I did an 'svn up' on people.a.
Craig Russell (JIRA) wrote:
> Add process for voting a new PPMC member to guides/ppmc
> ---
>
> Key: INCUBATOR-56
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-56
> Project: Incubator
>
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
...
> I "vetoed" the codedump for two main reasons. The first is that the IP
> clearance process is not being followed: there is no record of the code
> here
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> and there has been no vote by the Tuscany PPMC or Incubator
Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
> No, a FAXed copy is fine. It's just that if someone rec's the
> grant, they can't just "log" it in the cclas.txt/grants.txt file
> and keep it. I need a copy as well.
>
> We need to further clarify that such docs can be accepted either
> by:
>
> o Hardcopy snail-maile
addition to faxing the software grant, be
sure to mail a hardcopy original.
thanks, Jim!
-jean
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> Currently the ip clearance template [1] specifies:
>
>>3. Receipt of the software grant form must be acknowledged by an Officer of
>>the ASF by recording
Currently the ip clearance template [1] specifies:
> 3. Receipt of the software grant form must be acknowledged by an Officer of
> the ASF by recording in grants.txt. In most normal circumstances, the officer
> should be the ASF Secretary.
And in the Copyright section:
> Identify name recorded f
+1
-jean
Dave wrote:
> OK, let's try this again.
>
> The Roller community believes that Roller is ready for graduation, as
> evidenced by this vote:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-roller-dev/200702.mbox/browser
>
>
> We would like to initiate a vote to graduate to a top
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 04 February 2007 22:42, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> > * donations (whether covered by a CLA, JIRA opt in or a software grant)
>>
>> Shouldn't we avoid the word "donation"?? Code is not donated to
Felix looks ready to me.
+1
-jean
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Apparently we had inadvertently left Upayavira off the PMC list, even
> though we reviewed the board resolution twice...thanks to Niclas Hedhman
> for catching this. I have attached the updated board resolution to this
> message.
>
>
It's been more than the 48 hours required [1], so I'll go ahead and
close this thread and let the project know that the code has been
cleared for import.
regards,
-jean
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> IBM has contr
IBM has contributed system tests to Apache Derby:
- The ASF secretary has recorded the software grant.
- The code was uploaded to Jira issue DERBY-2134.[1]
- The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site.[2]
- The vote to accept it passed. [3]
Please let me know of any issues.
regard
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 1/4/07, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> robert burrell donkin wrote:
...
>> If you think this would be helpful, I'll start putting some linkages in
>> place. :-) I do think it's important that the guide
robert burrell donkin wrote:
...
> if the mentors could find the time, feedback on
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation would be appreciated. it
> needs some more work but it'd be useful to know how close it is and
> what improvements are required.
Somewhere it would help to link it to
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
>>> There was a question raised by Greg Stein about a better template for
>>> board resolution, but since no alternative template has been made
>>> available, we are sticking wi
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I guess we can close the vote - it's been running for 96 hours already.
> We've got 5 "plus one" votes, of which 4 are from the Incubator PMC
> members, and no other votes. Here is a breakdown:
>
> Bill Dudney
> Jean T. A
related links are also shown below - [2], [3]. The following
> people cast +1 votes:
>
> Andrus Adamchik (PPMC)
> Craig Russell
> Malcolm Edgar (committer)
> Matt Kerr
> Tore Halset (PPMC)
> Ari Maniatis
> Bill Dudney (PPMC)
> Michael Gentry (PPMC)
&g
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>>On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Jim Jagielski wrote:
> ...
>>>>The release_notes.txt in the docs folder
>>>>of the release build refer to Apache CXF and
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> >
...
>> > The release_notes.txt in the docs folder
>> > of the release build refer to Apache CXF and not Apache
>> > Incu
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>
>> The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the
>> previous licensing issues. Builds have been published here:
>>
>> Binaries and Source Distributions:
>> http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubato
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-50?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson resolved INCUBATOR-50.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed incubator_adffaces_page.patch, revision 480209.
> adffaces/trinidad page upd
Henri Yandell wrote:
> One thing that came out of the board meeting was making sure that the
> community knew how to bring code into the ASF. What the scenarios are,
> and what the rules are.
I'm looking at some logistics and have been following what I see other
ASF projects doing. Are the steps b
Craig L Russell wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> 6. Cayenne:
>>> Mentors:Jean Anderson, Brian McAllister, Bill Dudney
>>> Started:March 2006
>>> Incomplete: Nothing
>>>
Henri Yandell wrote:
> One thing that came out of the board meeting was making sure that the
> community knew how to bring code into the ASF. What the scenarios are,
> and what the rules are.
>
> Looking around at the Incubator, it's well documented at
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/,
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
...
> So, I am asking for a vote of the Incubator on graduation of Harmony
> that is conditional on the board's approval of a TLP for that purpose.
> This way we don't have to vote again after the board meeting on
> Wednesday (or whenever the board considers the proposal).
> On 10/10/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Jean,
>>
>> Your suggestion looks sound to me.
>
> +1
>
>> > Some clarifications are needed on the PPMC page, including:
>> > - the PPMC has no legal standing, so no need for board notification
>
> i'm not sure about this. roy seems v
Given recent PPMC discussions on general@, it has been on my mind to add a
section titled "Voting in a new PPMC member" to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
Brian McCallister and I chatted about this at the hackathon. Since having
a PPMC is instructional, we think that it would be helpf
I've been holding onto posts with good fodder for the incubator site,
but haven't had time to incorporate them yet.
I'll be at the hackathon on Tuesday Oct 10. Is anyone else up for a
docathon? (Or did I miss a post already suggesting one? *chagrin*)
-jean
--
This looks good to me. +1
-jean
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I just posted the new release snapshots here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
>
> The changes from the first attempt are:
>
> * Added license headers to the .dtd and .css files in the documentation.
> * Added lic
Cayenne has obtained ICLAs for all committers, including retired
committers. They have also obtained ICLAs for any who submitted patches
-- with the exception of 4 patch submitters whose contributions were
minor, trivial, reworked or broken [1] ([1] is also included down
below). 6 files/classes are
Carl Trieloff wrote:
...
> Here are some examples for Derby.
Derby is a relational database implemented entirely in java, which
entered the Apache Incubator in August 2004. With those points in mind
1) This looks like Cub Scout race management software and the most
recent date on the web si
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
...
> [...] Probably makes sense to mention in the incubator docs [1] that
> new committers are to be voted in following the normal Apache procedures.
Actually it's the incubator ppmc doc that discusses voting in new
committers:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-23?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson closed INCUBATOR-23.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> OpenEJB status page
> ---
>
> Key: INCUBATOR-23
> URL: http://is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-24?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson closed INCUBATOR-24.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Setup OpenEJB mailing lists
> ---
>
> Key: INCUBATOR-24
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-18?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson resolved INCUBATOR-18.
---
Resolution: Invalid
See INFRA-750.
> New Committers for "ADF Faces" Podling
> --
>
&g
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-19?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson closed INCUBATOR-19.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed by INFRA-751.
> Set Up JIRA Project for "ADF Faces&
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-17?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson closed INCUBATOR-17.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Request submitted to INFRA-749.
> Set Up SVN Repository for "ADF Faces&
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-25?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson closed INCUBATOR-25.
-
> update of the adffaces page on i.a.o
>
>
> Key: INCUBATOR-25
>
oops, to commit Matthias' patch I needed to do a "svn propset
svn:eol-style native" adffaces.xml and adffaces.html (I'm on linux and
these files were created on dos), hence his small changes look like huge
changes.
next time I'll separate the propset from the content change.
sorry,
-jean
[EMAI
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-25?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson resolved INCUBATOR-25:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Jean T. Anderson
Patch committed revision 421789.
> update of the adffaces page on i.
I'll wait to see if there's anymore feedback on Cliff's wording, then
will add this to the committers guide.
-jean
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> On 7/11/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > below) and other recent threads, here's what I would propose also be
>> > doc'd:
>> >
>> >
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Jean-
>
>
>> Given this paragraph in the committers guide [1]:
>>
>> > Everything -- but everything-- inside the Apache world occurs or is
>> reflected in email. As some people say, 'If it isn't in my email, it
>> didn't happen.'
>>
>> Would adding this sentence to th
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> Any off-list communication is a potential problem, not just IRC.
>
> sure. but IRC is much more a "problem" than IM.
> IM *mostly* is peer-peer "chat". IRC a *group* is involved.
Given this paragraph in the committers guide [1]:
> Everything -- but everything-- insi
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > Someone did point out that dev traffic is falling off while commit
>> > traffic is same or increasing.
>>
>> Yep -- and since asking about the Synapse perspective, I haven't seen
>> a persuasive argument that IRC has been a particularly positive thing
>> for them. T
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hey,
>
> the website requirements say nothing about a DOAP file for the
> Podlings. With the DOAP file a Polding is able to be listed on
> "projects.a.o"
>
> To me, there *shouldn't* be a DOAP file (see [1]) for a Podling, since
> a Podling is not a full ASF project.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 6/26/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I like the changes evolving so far in the docathon.
>>
>> regarding guides/ppmc.html , more stuff could be moved from
>> guides/committer.html includes participating
The old learn/mailing-lists was merged into guides/committers, which is
another excellent change.
But I have a question about this wording that was carried over:
"In addition to the per-project and special-group mailing lists,
there are a few that cross all boundaries:"
So per-project is the
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
