resend from an email that won't need moderation (sorry for the dup).

sebb wrote:
> On 15/12/2007, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
>>> contributions from IBM:
>>>
>>> "Software Grant License Agreement", informally known as the
>>> "IBM UIMA License Agreement".
>>>
>>> however, that license is not in LICENSE, nor is it linked from there.
>>> >> this wording was approved in their first release -- iirc there were
>> discussions about what specifically to put there [1] and I had a minor
>> hand in that since they had borrowed wording from derby [2].
>> > I'm not objecting to the wording in the NOTICE file.
> However, since it refers to another license, I think that needs to be
> present in the LICENSE file:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses >
The software grant license agreement to which it refers is this :

http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt

I assumed that when outside entities file software grants they always
use the software-grant.txt form (or CCLA addendum B in
cla-corporate.txt),  but I'm probably wrong about that.

For this release, I don't think anything needs to be done. Perhaps a
broader issue is how apache projects as a whole should reference the
code drops that come in via a software grant -- or if it's even
necessary to do so since the original copyright is in the NOTICE file.
Perhaps that's sufficient?

-jean


>>  -jean
>>
>> [1] http://tinyurl.com/2jncrq
>> [2] http://tinyurl.com/3bdz9n

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to