Jean T. Anderson wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: >>On 11/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>Jim Jagielski wrote: > ... >>>>The release_notes.txt in the docs folder >>>>of the release build refer to Apache CXF and not Apache >>>>Incubator CXF. This should be fixed :) >>> >>>actually, the branding page [1] says "the podling MUST be referred to as >>>Apache "Podling-Name" AND mention that the project is under Incubation." >>> >>>I don't believe "Incubator" must be in the actual name as long as >>>mention of incubation is made. Right? >> >>that's how i read that document too >> >>but on the normative >>http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Podling+Constraints >> >>there is: >> >>"Should the Incubator PMC, in accordance with these guidelines vote to >>approve the request, the Podling MAY perform the release under the >>following constraints : >> >> * the release archive MUST contain the word "incubating" in the >>filename; and >> * the release archive MUST contain an Incubation disclaimer (as >>described in the previous section), clearly visible in the main >>documentation or README file." >> >>since it's policy, it is a blocker > > > I think cxf is ok -- their file has "incubating" in the name (I
er ... um ... ok, the filename has "incubator" in the name, not "incubating". :-) -jean > downloaded cxf-2.0-incubator-M1.tar.gz). After I unpacked it, the > DISCLAIMER at the top level has the standard incubator disclaimer, and > the README at the top level also includes the incubator disclaimer. > > What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should probably > include the incubator disclaimer. > > btw, I didn't do any other checks on the distribution. --The naming > issue hit my radar because of all the podlings. > > -jean > > > >>unless anyone gets there first, i'll update the branding and release >>guidelines to include a link to this section >> >> >>> (If not, other podlings aren't including "Incubator" in the name.) >> >> >>i didn't realise that this was required (so that's not on my list of >>checks) >> >>sorry for not picking this up sooner but it needs to be renamed >> >>(if we had something like the all pmc's list for ppmc'ers might be a >>good idea to post a reminder to everyone...) >> >>- robert >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
