Re: [QUESTION] Requirements for documentation

2024-12-19 Thread David Jencks
Quite a few projects are using Antora, including Camel, Felix, and Aries. David Jencks > On Dec 19, 2024, at 3:11 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> 1. Are there any requirements for the documentation directory structure >> under the website? > > No, that

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

2024-07-31 Thread David Jencks
"a lot of the proposed PMCs” There are a lot of projects mentioned in this thread, and I think this is genuinely ambiguous. Do you mean PMCs or PMC members? David Jencks > On Jul 30, 2024, at 8:47 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > In general, projects joining th

Re: PMC is a committee

2024-07-07 Thread David Jencks
Well, every time I see “PMC” and it appears from the context that one person is meant, I’m confused, and I have doubts about whether the author knows what they mean. I applaud Greg for complaining. What’s wrong with “PMCM” for an individual? David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 7, 2

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache AsterixDB - JDBC Driver

2021-09-08 Thread David Jencks
conversation. David Jencks > On Sep 7, 2021, at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Hi Till > > fwiw I think the donation is fine though the AsterixDB PMC will need to do > some due diligence in verifying ownership of code before forming a release. > This is likely what Just

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DataSketches-java 1.3.0-incubating-RC1

2020-05-04 Thread David Jencks
, which is the normal state of affairs for employees in the US. I don’t think he is claiming Verizon copyright on code contributed by others. David Jencks > On May 4, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I find no record of Verizon Media or its predecessors (i

Re: [DISCUSS] NLPCraft Proposal

2020-02-05 Thread David Jencks
could have written the below and meant “The original code for the proposed NLPCraft project was written when the NLPCraft company was called DataLingvo”. Hope this is not just noise… david jencks > On Feb 5, 2020, at 1:20 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > >> The original cod

Re: Some interesting incubator stats

2019-11-14 Thread David Jencks
Nice to see, thanks! If you automate this or do it again I’d like to see e.g. … - Of the podlings that joined in 2017 4 have graduated and 1 has retired Thanks again David Jencks > On Nov 14, 2019, at 6:02 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Here’s some interesting

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-13 Thread David Jencks
What’s a “vanity mentor“? How do I recognize one before a podling has a significant history? Who is currently accepting these vanity mentors and how would they stop doing so? Hindsight is 20-20... I have no crystal ball. David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 13, 2019, at 5:10 PM, Jus

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

2019-08-12 Thread David Jencks
be dragging the project down and pushing it away from Apache. Are you still sure?” Why not just ask them directly? David Jencks > On Aug 12, 2019, at 3:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Is there a problem we are trying to solve or is this just a concern that &g

Re: New disclaimer text

2019-07-15 Thread David Jencks
To me, v2 implies an improvement over its predecessor and an expectation that eventually it will universally replace said predecessor. Perhaps DISCLAIMER-b.txt DISCLAIMER-x.txt might avoid this implication? David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 15, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wr

Re: Voting on releases with serious unaddressed issues

2019-03-30 Thread David Jencks
David Jencks > On Mar 30, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 6:26 PM Wade Chandler <mailto:wadechand...@apache.org>> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 22:34 Justin Mclean >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, &

Re: Feedback requested: New committer invitation template

2018-12-30 Thread David Jencks
I like this couchdb text a lot except please actually invite the recipient instead of indicating a desire to perhaps do so at some indefinite time. E.g. > The Apache CouchDB Project Management Committee (PMC) hereby invites you to > become a committer. David Jencks Sent from my iPhone

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-13 Thread David Jencks
coordinates be? Thanks David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2018, at 5:23 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > I think this is reasonably enough for this release. > > We should keep an eye on it and probably someone can upload a fixed release > to maven.central. > > I&#

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

2018-02-11 Thread David Jencks
ss has been made on this issue, has the jar been removed from the new RC? I just scanned a couple of the links below but didn’t see any mention of this. david jencks > On Feb 9, 2018, at 1:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > Hi all, > > The Apache NetBeans community has

Re: Apache Policy Quiz

2018-01-24 Thread David Jencks
questions I thought there was a mismatch between my understanding of Apache policy and any of the possible answers presented, and I ended up feeling vaguely insulted. David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 24, 2018, at 9:03 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Every single question that I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

2018-01-24 Thread David Jencks
This is all ALv2 licensed. Some Felix subprojects can be configured to use unmodified equinox (the eclipse OSGI framework implementation) for testing as well as the Felix framework implementation. As far as I know no Felix subprojects depend on any equinox jars for non-test purposes. [snip] david jencks

Re: Machine Learning in METRON

2017-02-18 Thread David Jencks
ebsite and also explain why the instructions I found are at GitHub rather than apache. david jencks > On Feb 18, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > Casey/Sergio: > > > i appreciate the plethora of documentation on maintaining licenses..looking > for doc on > h

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

2016-11-21 Thread David Jencks
I didn’t vote here, but I rarely indicate my vote is binding although it usually is. Checking here which votes are binding would have taken quite a while…. perhaps in the future asking people to indicate if their vote is binding would help. thanks david jencks > On Nov 21, 2016, at 10:30

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

2016-01-20 Thread David Jencks
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 8:32 AM, James Malone > wrote: > > The Dataflow programming model has been designed with simplicity, > scalability, and speed as key tenants. s/tenants/tenets? david jencks

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

2015-11-03 Thread David Jencks
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > On 11/02/2015 09:50 AM, David Jencks wrote: >> I haven’t looked at what they are doing and don’t expect I will. However, >> I’m assuming that jira changes all get to the dev list, as in all other >>

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

2015-11-02 Thread David Jencks
happening in the first place until this community process is straightened out. > > I haven’t looked at what they are doing and don’t expect I will. However, I’m assuming that jira changes all get to the dev list, as in all other projects I’ve worked on. I don’t see the point in duplicat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0-RC3

2015-03-21 Thread David Jencks
I thought the more-up-to-date version of the backport stuff was here: http://backport-jsr166.sourceforge.net/ david jencks On Mar 21, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > --089e0112c408e2ec4c0511c9d829 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encodin

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

2014-11-13 Thread David Jencks
. (I remember something about the sun implementation but for some reason it was not in a form I could learn anything from). thanks david jencks On Nov 13, 2014, at 1:14 PM, Hal Lockhart wrote: > Abstract > > OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the development

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Spark from the Incubator

2014-02-09 Thread David Jencks
I agree with Joe, voting on a moving target is not going to produce a result anyone can look back on and understand. Chris, you may be able to understand what is happening but I'm having trouble from my attempts to follow this thread. thanks david jencks On Feb 9, 2014, at 5:29 PM, J

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivory - Hadoop data management and processing platform

2013-03-20 Thread David Jencks
-applications/oracle-database-solutions david jencks On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote: > Hi Justin, >I am assuming it won't be an issue as Falcon used within the > Adobe/Apache Flex isn't related to Hadoop. > > Regards > Srikanth Sundarraj

Re: UMA Implementation

2012-07-05 Thread David Jencks
you plan to continue to contribute you'll need to provide a CLA (see http://www.apache.org/licenses/ ) and your employer may need to provide a CCLA. thanks david jencks On Jul 5, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: > Hi, Suleman. > > Thank you for your interest to contribute

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP

2012-02-08 Thread David Jencks
+1 david jencks On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Hi... > > It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache > BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or > not, [1], [2] and [3]. > In the past few we

Re: [DISCUSS] Poddling new committer process

2010-11-17 Thread David Jencks
+1 (with the one required mentor/IPMC vote and notifying private@) david jencks On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:41 AM, Glen Daniels wrote: > +1 from me. > > I also agree with Bertrand's point about notifying private@, and would be OK > with requiring a (single) mentor/IPMC vote to ensur

Re: [VOTE] Apache SIS 0.1-incubating Release Candidate #2

2010-11-10 Thread David Jencks
I agree with ant that you should clean this up before releasing. frustrating but worthwhile. I also agree with what he thinks should be removed. thanks david jencks On Nov 10, 2010, at 2:12 PM, ant elder wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote:

Re: podling reporting

2010-09-05 Thread David Jencks
found relates to keeping a page tracking those steps that up to date. Maybe it would be better to call the page mentioned in the link you found the "status page" and the stuff that goes to the board a "status report"? thanks david jencks On Sep 5, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Be

Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework"

2010-08-27 Thread David Jencks
towards what it does. OpenContentConnectorFramework is descriptive but a bit long. OpenCCF? To try to illustrate my thinking rather than push a name down your throat... Open ConnectorFramework/OpenConnectorFramework/OpenCF OK, since you've added a branding word. Not ideal since the pu

Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework"

2010-08-26 Thread David Jencks
able to skip #5, but that >> process would probably be slower in the end! > > Well, I would argue we did all that, with the exception of a formal IPMC vote > (although we did ask here). It seemed to pass muster until a week later, a > fair amount of time after we went and m

Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework"

2010-08-24 Thread David Jencks
cture). To be blunt I think this is a really bad name and feels to me a bit like a land grab. thanks david jencks On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:38 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >> On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Pid * wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

2010-08-17 Thread David Jencks
On Aug 17, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:09 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> Dunno if it's exactly documentation but see this from Roy Fielding >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

2010-08-17 Thread David Jencks
rrier to graduation.. +1 david jencks On Aug 16, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM, sebb wrote: >> Also, just noticed that the SVN tree does not appear to have a copy of >> the LICENSE file. >> Normally this is stored alongside the NOTIC

Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework"

2010-08-16 Thread David Jencks
7;d assume it was some kind of generalization of the transport connectors for a web container. Since this now or formerly relates to lucene I kinda doubt either one of these assumptions would be particularly accurate. thanks david jencks On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:59 AM, wrote: > Hi, >

Re: Incubator Board Report - August 2010

2010-08-16 Thread David Jencks
Sorry for the lateness, as one of the Amber mentors I would like to sign off on the amber portion of this report. thanks david jencks On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Matt Benson, Srinath Perera, and Michael McCandless all joined the > Incubator. Several more w

Re: Retired/dormant projects

2010-06-11 Thread David Jencks
creator before anything significant happened here, it has continued at codehaus. Read-only or removal would be appropriate. david jencks > tell; no updates to SVN since end of 2005 > > Should their SVN directories be made read-only? > >

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-07 Thread David Jencks
+1 (not yet binding?) thanks david jencks On May 4, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OA

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

2010-05-01 Thread David Jencks
Also if Amber needs more mentors I can apply to join the incubator pmc and be an additional mentor. thanks david jencks On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:43 PM, David Jencks wrote: > I'm interested in implementing jaspic (jsr 196) support if practical. This > should allow Amber to provid

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

2010-04-29 Thread David Jencks
erver auth module makes sense. I've added myself to the initial committers list hopefully this is the appropriate way to express my interest :-) thanks david jencks On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Paul Lindner wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > If you are considering merging Scrib

Re: BouncyCastle IDEA patent

2007-02-21 Thread David Jencks
the patented code you use the geronimo- util jar instead. thanks david jencks Thanks for the heads up. We'll check with the jxta folks and see if they use/expose the patented code. We should move this discussion to tuscany-dev and report back to the IPMC when i

Re: Branding of Incubator projects

2006-06-26 Thread David Jencks
undesirable as long is it makes the incubation status clear. thanks david jencks Podling has been approved to graduate from the incubator: Formal press release, issued by the ASF. Or jointly by the ASF and any affiliated organizations/groups. Susan -

Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs

2006-03-14 Thread David Jencks
I'm not sure what is going on with that, I have commtted work to AMQ although it has been quite a while. Why are you looking only at the branches? And in particular why not include amq 4? thanks david jencks On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Hmmm... svn lo

Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs

2006-03-13 Thread David Jencks
point of incubation is to basically get everyone used to working more closely together, and when we have verified that this is happening, we can bring all the activemq people on board into geronimo. I don't see how a PPMC is going to help this process: it looks to me as if it will

Re: BPEL contribution from Sybase

2006-02-13 Thread David Jencks
I'd like to retract this email. I have doubts on both sides of this and may try to explain them in a clearer way in another message. My apologies david jencks On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:26 PM, David Jencks wrote: After being nervous for quite a while I have come to think that the sybase

Re: BPEL contribution from Sybase

2006-02-13 Thread David Jencks
ea I can't see any way it could mean anything but stifling innovation. I hope you can clarify what you mean. thanks david jencks --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Let's rewind!!! (Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project)

2006-02-03 Thread David Jencks
t that this would have a bad effect on the servicemix community, but I have no experience to justify this opinion with. Comments? many thanks david jencks On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Bill Flood wrote: Dims, I'll take Cory off the hook since he was acting in good faith on behalf

Re: Proposal for a centralized Eclipse update manager site for Apache projects/software

2005-05-03 Thread David Jencks
I'm not really familiar with eclipse. Could you please explain what advantages your proposal has over building your project with maven? From your description I would guess that using maven as your build system provides all the features you want with more automation. many thanks, david j

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Geronimo from Incubator and recommend as top-level project

2004-05-21 Thread David Jencks
[ ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements for incubation and will be recommended to the board for TLP status +1 Many thanks for all the assistance from the Apache veterans. David Jencks - To

Re: moving JAM to org.apache.jam

2004-03-26 Thread David Jencks
n used by xmlbeans. Maven makes this kind of "multiproject projects" rather easy to set up, but mavenizing the rest of the xmlbeans build could be a challenge. Not that I am any kind of expert, but I would wait to try to make a separate project until it has more explicit contr

Re: donation of project

2004-01-01 Thread David Jencks
find even within apache and so this project might actually be a reasonable incubation candidate. Hope this doesn't muddy the waters too much, thanks david jencks On Thursday, January 1, 2004, at 08:57 AM, Matt Liotta wrote: Thanks for all the responses. At this point, I am reluctant to re

Re: [VOTE] Official Name for "Geronimo" Project

2003-12-01 Thread David Jencks
), Merlin (religious and possibly a person's name), Pluto (religious and possibly a geographical place, depending on whether you think planets have geography), and possibly Avalon (possibly a geographical name for the British Isles AFAIK) /****** * Davi

Re: [HEADSUP] New Incubator site in CVS

2003-10-16 Thread David Jencks
working to make the incubation process clearer and more visible. david jencks On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 11:17 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: I have finished porting all the old site to the new layout. The site source is under the "incubator" CVS, and the layout has been changed to

Re: Disclaimer text for incubated projects

2003-10-04 Thread David Jencks
is what anyone intends. david jencks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]