I'm not sure what is going on with that, I have commtted work to AMQ
although it has been quite a while.
Why are you looking only at the branches? And in particular why not
include amq 4?
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:39 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Hmmm...
svn log svn://svn.activemq.org/activemq/scm/branches/activemq-3/
activemq
| grep "|" | cut -f 2 -d "|" | sort | uniq
gives me just 15:
aco
ammulder
brianm
chirino
djcook
foconer
gnt
jgapuz
jlim
jstrachan
maguro
pbrooke
pvillacorta
rajdavies
rsaba
-- dims
On 3/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IIUC, they all contributed code to the AMQ project.
Regards,
Alan
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
What i'd be interested to know is how many of the 17 Non-Apache
Committers noted on the proposal[1] got Apache id's and of them how
many of them actually made any commits to the Apache SVN repo.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
On 3/14/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Jencks wrote:
I think I'm seeing too much incipient dogmatism here. A little
while
ago I remember reading about how it was possible for code to zip
through the incubator on its way to become part of an existing
project, resting only long enough for the legal/provenance
questions
to be resolved. I think this is still a good path to keep
open, and
don't see the use of a PPMC for it.
Except ActiveMQ isn't just code, it's code+people. If all
the people are already associated with the ASF when the
podling enters incubation.. well, then why isn't it being
handled as a grant of code? The need for a podling implies
the presence of people new to the ASF.
For instance, my understanding
is that ActiveMQ is coming to be part of geronimo.
Most likely, yes -- but it's not a certainty. (Just close to
it.) The eventual disposition is made at graduation.
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBRBbFR5rNPMCpn3XdAQKqOAQAtm4gWzEgdP9FZKknZWVbszAbIBafgvvn
4wfPatOdUpy577axawHnFDq3i6OG3poPqYn7OecqZkCXSimSIf3Hp7CsijzHnL/x
rsluUCyPkW11/zs/lvlkXhpIWjNmpTV0T4EkiadZfIPK704qUE3CHpkKT0uYS7lk
xsA1obdLoes=
=3klG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
