Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

odling. > +In addition, the Podling MAY choose to distribute approved releases > through > +other channels like the central Maven repository. > > > > > --------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Dan Diephouse http://netzooid.com/blog

Re: Publishing Releases for Mirrors

Thanks Dan! So obvious in retrospect :-) I did a locate for where the cxf binaries where and I must have missed that location. Dan Daniel Kulp wrote: On Thursday 10 April 2008, Dan Diephouse wrote: How do we get "abdera" to show up in here: http://www.apache.org/dist

Publishing Releases for Mirrors

did I miss something? Dan -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[RESULTS] Re: [VOTE] Release Abdera 0.4.0-incubating Take 7

-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release Abdera 0.4.0-incubating Take 7

published without running the full test suite. Dan -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release Abdera 0.4.0-incubating Take 7

please? Same place as always - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/abdera/java/tags/abdera-0.4.0-incubating/ -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: License files - separate or one file

On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > > > I misspoke. Here's what I meant to ask: > > > > > > Do we need to 1) include all the licenses for all our dependencies in a > > single LICENSE file or can we 2) have our top LICENSE file wh

Re: License files - separate or one file [was Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)]

Kevan Miller wrote: On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote: Dan Diephouse wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/03/2008, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> -1: The LICENSE files need to either contain copies of the 3rd party >>> >> > licenses, or

Re: License files - separate or one file [was Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)]

Dan Diephouse wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/03/2008, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> -1: The LICENSE files need to either contain copies of the 3rd party >>> >> > licenses, or they need to have a reference to the 3rd party licences. >>

License files - separate or one file [was Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)]

sebb wrote: On 31/03/2008, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> -1: The LICENSE files need to either contain copies of the 3rd party >>> >> > licenses, or they need to have a reference to the 3rd party licences. >> > Equally, there i

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)

actly is legally permissible for distributions. If you look at many other ASF projects in the incubator and outside, you'll see that this is not an enforced policy - this is simply telling developers one way to get started here. Dan -- Dan Die

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)

Oops hit "ctrl enter" instead of "ctrl-v enter". Here's the tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/abdera/java/tags/abdera-0.4.0-incubating/ Dan Dan Diephouse wrote: I removed the empty sources jar and tagged the release: Dan Diephouse wrote: sebb wrote

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)

I removed the empty sources jar and tagged the release: Dan Diephouse wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/03/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -1: There are MD5 and SHA1 digests in the directory, but the archives have no signatures. OK, I will fix this. Maven Repository

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)

;m not saying that we didn't miss something, but I am saying that the ones that I know about don't necessarily require a header. What is the SVN tag that corresponds with the archives? the branch will be tagged once its released. Dan -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mules

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating

ote: > > Have you guys run RAT over the release ? I tried it over the source > > distribution and various source files are missing ASF license header. > > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lresende/abdera/rat.log > > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:37 PM,

Re: Confluence Based Website Access Control

access to a Confluence-backed web site who is not a Committer on the project. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse

[VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating

://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-abdera-dev/200803.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF Graduation as TLP

e Apache CXF PMC; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache CXF PMC: * Ulhas Bhole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Sean O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Dan Diephouse

Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.2-incubator

rties tools/wsdlto/test/src/test/resources/META-INF/services/com.sun.tools.xjc.Plugin Cheers, Matthieu On 9/11/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version includes mosltly bug fixes since the 2.0.1 release. For a full list of the iss

[VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.2-incubator

e time to look over this release! - Dan -- Dan Diephouse MuleSource http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[result] [vote] Jeff Genender as a Committer on CXF

> wrote: On Jun 8, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > Hiya, > We started this vote (and another one for Christopher Moesel which > I just > sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) a while back on CXF-dev, and we've been > unable to > gain the necessary number of IPMC votes ne

Re: CXF committer votes

--- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

[result] [vote] Christopher Moesel as committer on CXF

> wrote: On Jun 8, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > Hiya, > We started this vote (and a second one for Jeff Genender which I will > forward in a moment) a while back on CXF-dev, and we've been unable > to gain > the necessary number of IPMC votes necessary to clos

[vote] Jeff Genender as a Committer on CXF

votes from IPMC members. I'm forwarding it here in hopes that we can change that :-) If you could please take a moment to review this and hopefully add your +1, I know the CXF community as well as Jeff would appreciate it. Thanks, - Dan On 5/17/07, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[vote] Christopher Moesel as committer on CXF

IPMC members. I'm forwarding it here in hopes that we can change that :-) If you could please take a moment to review this and hopefully add your +1, I know the CXF community as well as Chris and Jeff would both appreciate it. Thanks, - Dan -- Forwarded message ------ From: Dan

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

, which makes this somebody easily > verified > by checking > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee- > info.txt > . Just like most of us haven't committed all apache docs to memory, > root > won't have committed the list of who is on which PMC to memory. We > want > to make it easy for root to process that account request. > > -jean > > >> But then the ppmc member who is managing the new committer >> process should ask an incubator pmc member to make the root request, >> and that incubator pmc member would naturally but not necessarily be >> one of the podling's mentors. >> >> Craig > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

[announce] Apache CXF 2.0-incubator-RC Release

The Apache CXF team is proud to announce the availability of the 2.0-incubator-RC release! Release notes and download information can be found here: Apache CXF is a Java open source service development framework. This release contains the following features: * JAX-WS frontend - Apache CXF uses/i

Re: [VOTE] Should we treat incubator releases differently to normal releases

(non-binding) ONE: Should Incubator tarballs go in the normal place (and thus mirrors). [X] +1 [ ] -1 TWO: Should there be an Incubator maven repository. [ ] +1 [X] -1 -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

are talking about snapshots. That problem will exist no matter what since no one with the right head will publish snapshots to the central repo. Not really. In CXF we don't depend on any SNAPSHOTS and most people in general tend to shy away from them. +1 to getting rid of the m2 incuba

Re: JAX-WS TCK and CXF 2.0 release

ibe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

[announce] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release

The Apache Incubator CXF team is proud to announce the availability of the 2.0-M1 release! Release notes and download information can be found here: http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/apache-cxf-20-m1-incubating-release-notes.html Apache Incubator CXF is an open source service development framework. Th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 4)

--- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Servi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 4)

ibe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Re: Deploying Incubator Maven Artifacts [was Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)]

I must be missing something. If they aren't voted on, how do you know if they're valid and meet release requirements? On 12/7/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 7, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > On 12/7/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)

On 12/7/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/7/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As opposed to cutting a new release completely, can we choose one/any of the > follow options and get your +1? > 1. Not distribute the javadoc jar > 2. R

Deploying Incubator Maven Artifacts [was Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)]

vote as I understand it (sorry to cause trouble Abdera folks, I was the one pushing for those builds too!). - Dan 1. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-abdera-dev/200612.mbox/[EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)

hese licenses on the legal list, but haven't heard anything back yet. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Re: Add UIMA to reporting schedule [was: December 2006 Incubator Reports]

anted reports either ;-) I believe Wicket is in the same boat, they have also reported before and have not been added to the 3 month reporting schedule. --Thilo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

[VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)

The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the previous branding issues. As no one else seems to have found any other issues, we've cut a new build and published it here: Binaries and Source Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1-v2/

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

Is this a show stopper and a -1? Can we fix this as part of our next milestone? On 11/30/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote: > The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the > previous licensing is

[VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate release which fixes the previous licensing issues. Builds have been published here: Binaries and Source Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~blin/incubator-cxf-2.0-M1/ Maven Repository: http:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/24/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've taken immediate action to remove these files from SVN. > > thanks :-) > > > I'm curious to > > know if any other Apache projects depend on this wsi-swa.xsd

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

=log http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/webservices/axis/trunk/c/tests/auto_build/wsi/monitorConfig.xml?view=log I'm not sure if these files are being distributed or not. Maybe the Axis team can comment? - Dan On 11/23/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've taken immediate

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

on how to best deal with this. - Dan On 11/23/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Arggh... *mutters very bad things about standards organizations*. Looking into this deeper, and the only file that I can find that is associated with the WS-I organization is this one: http://

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

ime through, but not all of it it seems. Thanks Robert, - Dan On 11/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/22/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We ask that you please vote to approve this release binary: > > [ ] +1 Release the bina

Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany

different lists, the intention here was to notify the IPMC that we > were having a vote in Tuscany and to ask for their input (and > hopefully votes) there. If we got three IPMC +1's on the project list > I would think that was binding. > > -- > Jeremy > > On Nov 2

Re: Notification of a(nother) release vote for Tuscany

ny interested members to review the content. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200611.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks -- Jeremy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

[VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

he.org/CXF/ once we finalize the release. Also, there are release notes in the docs/ directory. We ask that you please vote to approve this release binary: [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache CXF 2.0-M1 [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) Thanks! - The CXF team -- Dan Die

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1

o unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-205

Release notes... [was Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1]

ata after the release. So I think that having a release notes in the distribution is overrated and using the website can be a better approach. - Dan * -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.0.1

robert burrell donkin wrote: On 11/20/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since these are generated files, must they have license headers? no however, i think that running preprocessors against the source in the repository that strips license headers *is* an issue for m

Re: Policy on Initial Committership

e Incubator PMC votes on a proposal, that list must be set (i.e. no deletions after the vote concludes). -- justin +1 - I like your explanation & reasoning. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com ---

Re: PPMCs [was Re: what are required for contributing to release management]

Dan Diephouse wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am pretty philosophically against making every committer PPMC members. I don't agree at all. If they contribute code, they mer

Re: PPMCs [was Re: what are required for contributing to release management]

t and involvement with the project. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Policy on Initial Committership

ust inference on my part so far. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PPMCs [was Re: what are required for contributing to release management]

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200603.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. See Project Management Committee section here http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#structure -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com --

Re: Problem with commit rights on Celtixfire

mmiters typical? Thanks, Mark. -- Director of Standards, Development Manager, JBoss (a Division of Redhat). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan

Re: PPMCs [was Re: what are required for contributing to release management]

Garrett Rooney wrote: On 9/28/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: > thinking about whether there's a need to wait to release until the > PPMC is fully formed and representation of the podling committers. > > PPMCs are typically fille

PPMCs [was Re: what are required for contributing to release management]

ind any real docs on it (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html is silent) either. Cheers, - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com http://netzooid.com/blog - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [doc] call for feedback for http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html

style changes (blue for notes) The styling makes it very clear whats an example and whats not. I like it. Cheers, - Dan -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [

Re: Incubator Lightning Talks at ApacheCon US?

t list with people who've replied so far. Other folks should feel free to add your podlings and topics there. Thanks! -- justin Very cool. Just added CeltiXfire & myself. How about allowing lighting talks about the incubator & incubation in general? That could be a rousing get toge

Re: [policy] incubating projects and maven repositories v1.0

Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On 8/30/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well it can be run around right now too. I as a user of an incubating project can request that a jar be uploaded to ibiblio. The incubator and ibiblio policies are distinct. Unless the incubator can enforce pol

Re: [policy] incubating projects and maven repositories v1.0

amp;w=2 On 8/30/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why? Davanum Srinivas wrote: > If it comes to a VOTE, i'd vote -1 on automatic syncing of incubator > artifacts to maven central repo. > > -- dims > > On 8/30/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [policy] incubating projects and maven repositories v1.0

Unless the incubator can enforce policy on the Ibiblio/Maven project for them to police the artifacts, they can currently be redistributed on Ibiblio, it is just an extra pain for me as a user. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com http://netzoo

Re: [policy] incubating projects and maven repositories v1.0

Why? Davanum Srinivas wrote: If it comes to a VOTE, i'd vote -1 on automatic syncing of incubator artifacts to maven central repo. -- dims On 8/30/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like people objected to creating anot

Re: [policy] incubating projects and maven repositories v1.0

and take GPL jars for instance - if there is a transitive dependency on GPL jars, the user is completely responsible for that. Why would it be any different for an incubator JAR? - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisol

Re: [policy] incubating projects and maven repositories v1.0

s such I don't really see any downside to allowing the sync to Maven's central repository. Thoughts? Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com http://netzooid.com/blog -

Re: Setting up a Maven 2 repo Was: Maven 2 repo for incubating project releases?

al commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envois

Adding projects to report scheduel? [was Re: REMINDER: AUGUST REPORTS ARE ***DUE***]

PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] [UPDATE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

cts. I hope you appreciate the difference :) -- dims On 7/21/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 21:28 -0400, Dan Diephouse wrote: I hope you will poke your nose in, just as I read the axis list and try to poke my nose in there

Re: [VOTE] [UPDATE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 21:28 -0400, Dan Diephouse wrote: +1 Noel. I'd like to join the PPMC too as an interested party observer. I will poke my nose in as a mentor when possible but don't have the cycles to commit to it. Hi Sanjiva, I'm c

Re: [VOTE] [UPDATE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Dan Diephouse wrote: We have 4 mentors already, and from a logistical standpoint I find it hard to keep up with. Each mentor tends to have a different opinion or different input. While more input can be great, it can easily get to the

Re: [VOTE] [UPDATE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

int I find it hard to keep up with. Each mentor tends to have a different opinion or different input. While more input can be great, it can easily get to the point of overload and impedes Getting Stuff Done. :-) - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://env

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

wn. On Jun 30, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote: Hi Jim, Even once we're in the incubator the XFire project will still have to do releases. We have a 1.2 release in progress and will be doing bug fix releases as well. Additionally, I would imagine IONA might want to issue a bug

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

istinct name for the Apache project. Paul On 6/30/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/21/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/21/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Currently the plan is to leave both the ol

Re: mentoring celtixfire

peter royal wrote: i'm volunteering to help mentor celtixfire, i've added myself to the list in the wiki. -pete Excellent, thanks for volunteering! Cheers, - Dan -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://ne

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

ature-rich, open source ESB runtime that can support any organization’s adoption of Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) in the enterprise." I don't presume to speak for IONA, but after chatting with them a fair amount I wouldn't let their marketing team influence your opinion of wha

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

Thomas Dudziak wrote: (Btw, I don't know whether it's him anyway, because the name is spelled differently.) It was meant to be Hani Suleiman. I spelled his name wrong on the proposal and corrected it in the wiki immediately proceeding our submission. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

some 1.x or 1.0.x releases as well. Is this official policy? Or do we just need to come to some consensus as to whether or not this will be confusing for our users? - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolution

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

re associated with, if any: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CeltiXfireProposal Thanks Justin and Yoav. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com http://netzooid.com/blog - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

xf-ppmc * SVN Repository https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf * JIRA CeltiXfire (CeltiXfire) * Official Build Systems == Initial Committers == * Adi Sakala * Dan Diephouse * Guillaume Nodet * James Strachan * David Blevins * Peter Royal * Daniel Kulp * Balaji Ravi * Conrad

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

g to participate in an Apache meritocracy or is this some kind of joke? Sanjiva. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

ial Committers == * Adi Sakala * Dan Diephouse * Guillaume Nodet * James Strachan * David Blevins * Peter Royal * Daniel Kulp * Balaji Ravi * Conrad O'Dea * Hani Suileman * Mika Goekel * Adam Kramer * Tomek Sztelak * Stuart Edmondston * Bozhong Lin * Jervis Liu * Juli

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

NOTICE file is like, seriously messed up. What is going on around here lately? LSD, puzzled(tm) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse Envoi

Re: ajax proposal?

512.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Martin Cooper Sanjiva. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com --

Re: Incubating java projects

ation with WS-* projects that will happen. Thats how open source works right? Cheers, - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AJAX Toolkit Framework Proposal

* respectful, honest, technical-based interaction * faithful implementation of standards * security as a mandatory feature """" I think there is a space for any and all projects that meet the above criteria. Cheers, - Dan 1. http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it