Since these are generated files, must they have license headers? We had
a recent discussion on this on the legal-discuss list. To quote Roy: [1]
We don't require headers on generated files because they are a pain
in the butt to generate. Headers are not required to preserve
copyright,
so there is no "legal" reason to provide them at all. The reason we do
provide them is to inform the users that we have given them permission
to do Apache Licensed things with the code that copyright would
(normally)
prevent them from doing. In other words, the header is just us being
nice to our users (and hopefully reducing future FAQs).
Regards,
- Dan
1.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200611.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
They were in svn before the release has been performed by
the maven plugin. They still are present in the branch that
was used to release this version. Unfortunately, it seems
to be a maven bug :(
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 11/17/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The ServiceMix community voted on and has approved to release ServiceMix
3.0.1-incubating.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
publish the release.
running RAT, there seem to be a *lot* of poms without license header.
any reason why they are missing?
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
