+1 (IPMC)
Chris
Von: Willem Jiang
Datum: Freitag, 11. April 2025 um 08:34
An: Incubator General
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator
My +1 (binding)
Willem Jiang
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:37 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to call a VOTE to acce
My +1 (binding)
Willem Jiang
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:37 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to call a VOTE to accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator.
> The proposal is:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/BifroMQ+Proposal
>
> And the discussion:
> https:
+1 binding
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 14:14, Sheng Wu wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Sheng Wu 吴晟
> Twitter, wusheng1108
>
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 13:39, Calvin Kirs wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:37 AM Willem Jiang
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I want to c
+1
-Ayush
> On 11 Apr 2025, at 6:35 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> Thank you, Stefan!
>
> Great to get that on the record. Plus, I love hearing projects’ origin
> stories.
>
> Good luck in incubation!
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Apr 10, 2025, at 5:59 PM, Stefan Krawczyk
>> wrote:
>>
>> Fair que
+1 binding
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 13:39, Calvin Kirs wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:37 AM Willem Jiang
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I want to call a VOTE to accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator.
> > The proposal is:
> > https:/
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:37 AM Willem Jiang
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to call a VOTE to accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator.
> The proposal is:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/BifroMQ+Proposal
>
> And the discussion:
> https://lists.apache.org/t
Hi everyone,
I want to call a VOTE to accept BifroMQ into the Apache Incubator.
The proposal is:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/BifroMQ+Proposal
And the discussion:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/2d84dl3pmxxlsv24rwy80bqm7mtgtfh1
There will be a later follow-up discussion
I can feel the pain of changing the project name; the name search
process is light.
It's up to the champion to help the potential podling projects address
those problems before graduation.
How about we put it into Champion's checklist but not the bar for
entering the incubator?
By the way, we don'
Thank you, Stefan!
Great to get that on the record. Plus, I love hearing projects’ origin stories.
Good luck in incubation!
Julian
> On Apr 10, 2025, at 5:59 PM, Stefan Krawczyk
> wrote:
>
> Fair question!
>
> Hamilton was named from the confluence of three things:
> - the team it was orig
Fair question!
Hamilton was named from the confluence of three things:
- the team it was originally built for was the F.E.D. (forecasting
estimation and demand team) --> Alexander Hamilton created the Federal
reserve, or "FED" for short.
- the team was modeling the world, i.e. the business -> Ha
Hi,
>> In summary, I think podlings SHOULD perform a ASF name search before
>> entering incubation, but that's not a MUST.
That was my concern as well, and the wording has been changed to reflect that.
i.e. Podlings are encouraged to do this before entering teh Incubator, but they
don’t have to
+1 ! Woohoo!
On 2025/04/09 12:03:45 Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE to accept PouchDB into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The proposal is at:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/PouchDB+Proposal
>
> And the discussion here:
>
> https://lists
I think we have one more +1 vote that happened on the discuss thread (Kevin
R?). Otherwise, what are the next steps here? :)
Cheers,
Stefan
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 5:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 7:25 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
> >
> > Hi
Hi,
> All contributors were employed by OpenClovis, which means the company paid
> them for their code, so the Intellectual Property Rights in this case must
> belong to the company.
While that is generally the case, just because a company paid for code, does
not always mean they own the copyri
It doesn’t affect their entry into the Incubator, but I am curious what
motivated the names ‘Hamilton’ and ‘Burr’.
Especially when our history books and broadway musicals tell us that the one
murdered the other. :)
Julian
> On Apr 10, 2025, at 7:09 AM, PJ Fanning wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I
Hey all,
I'd like to call a VOTE to accept PouchDB into the Apache Incubator.
The proposal is at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/PouchDB+Proposal
And the discussion here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/j6j6x1t6ppdqttth2cfnr8rb7v1n4yrv
Please cast your vote:
[
+1 binding.
Best
Jan
—
>
> On 9. Apr 2025, at 14:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE to accept PouchDB into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The proposal is at:
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/PouchDB+Proposal
>
> And the discussion here:
Hi Bertrand,
I agree that we should not make it harder to enter incubator.
However, a podling name search should be lightweight while if a name won't
be approved, the downside is heavy (bother the established community to do
a rename overall).
Thus, considering the downside and the lightweight n
Hi everyone,
I'd like to formally begin the discussion about accepting Burr
into the Apache Incubator. The proposal is:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/BurrProposal
Related Thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8hxxv7y2z3p06jxm3mnp8o5qgoz4r3t3
The vote to accept the relate
I will add my +1 binding
I will announce the result shortly.
On 2025/04/10 07:38:41 Furkan Kamaci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Kind regards,
> Furkan Kamaci
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025, 12:10 AM Kevin Ratnasekera
> wrote:
>
> > +1 ( binding )
> > On Wed 9. Apr 2025 at 08:49, Stefan Krawcz
The vote passes with 6 +1s all binding, with no other votes.
Vote Thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/8om3chzswg870k0dpy8zc1r1vbrg0qbk
Votes (Apache IDs)
wave
jbonofre
ayushsaxena
djkevincr
kamaci
fanningpj
I will start the podling name acceptance in the next few days and
after that is comple
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 6:55 PM tison wrote:
> ...In the referred thread, people generally agree that we'd better put the
> podling name search process before entering incubation, so that podlings
> won't suffer during incubation
I object to that, let's not make it harder to enter incubat
Knock, knock: +1!
Best,
Ronny
On 2025/04/09 12:03:45 Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE to accept PouchDB into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The proposal is at:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/PouchDB+Proposal
>
> And the discussion here:
>
>
+1. We MUST resolve the project name issue no matter what, and the earlier,
the better and easier.
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 17:09, Huajie Wang wrote:
> +1. It's a good idea to resolve the project name issue before entering the
> ASF incubator
>
>
> Best,
> Huajie Wang
>
>
>
> Cheng Pan 于2025年4月10
+1 binding
- [x] Download Iggy is valid.
- [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
- [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct.
- [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
- [x] Can compile from source on my Archlinux x86_64.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, at 14:53, hulk wrote:
> +1 binding
>
+1. It's a good idea to resolve the project name issue before entering the
ASF incubator
Best,
Huajie Wang
Cheng Pan 于2025年4月10日周四 13:42写道：
> +1. Changing name after entering incubator is really complex stuff.
>
> Thanks,
> Cheng Pan
>
>
>
> > On Apr 8, 2025, at 00:54, tison wrote:
> >
> >
Hi,
+1 (binding)
Kind regards,
Furkan Kamaci
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025, 12:10 AM Kevin Ratnasekera
wrote:
> +1 ( binding )
> On Wed 9. Apr 2025 at 08:49, Stefan Krawczyk
> wrote:
>
> > I think we have one more +1 vote that happened on the discuss thread
> (Kevin
> > R?). Otherwise, what are the ne
+1. Otherwise some painful renaming process will happen in the incubation
phase ;/
Best,
Twice
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025, 1:32 PM Leonard（Lifeng Nie）
wrote:
> I support this idea.
>
> Xuanwo 于2025年4月10日周四 12:37写道：
>
> > I support this idea. Changing names after years incubation can be a great
> > l
+1 ( binding )
On Wed 9. Apr 2025 at 08:49, Stefan Krawczyk
wrote:
> I think we have one more +1 vote that happened on the discuss thread (Kevin
> R?). Otherwise, what are the next steps here? :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stefan
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 5:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> > +1 (bindin
29 matches
Mail list logo
