On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> 2009/9/1 Niclas Hedhman :
> ...
>> +1 for Incubation, btw. I might sign up as Mentor, if I can squeeze in the
>> time...
> Can I persuade you to sign up :-) ... we have two experienced ASF
> members as mentors, but I think the additional persp
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Cool! So, IMO would be best to post the names here on general@ and let
> Jeremy update the Wiki.
Since we're at it, I'd like to sign up as a committer as well (apache
username ngn). Will be quite time constrained in the next two-three
months bu
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> hey Gurkan,
>
> don't worry that much about the user-base. It will grow
Agree about that, an active users list it not a requirement for graduation.
Kevan mentions community diversity as something to improve before
graduation, t
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Hi Peter,
Excellent! I am hoping that the champions - in this case Kevan
Miller and Guillaume Nodet - will chime in on next steps.
Cool! So, IMO would be best to post the names here on general@ and let
Jeremy update the Wiki. That seems
Hi Peter,
Excellent! I am hoping that the champions - in this case Kevan Miller and
Guillaume Nodet - will chime in on next steps.
thanks,
dims
On 09/09/2009 01:45 PM, Peter Peshev wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
We from SAP would like to join and nominate six people for the
proposed Aries project. What's
Hi Jeremy,
We from SAP would like to join and nominate six people for the
proposed Aries project. What's the process - should I just add the six
names on the wiki ? Maybe we could discuss this offline to not spam
the whole mailing list.
Unfortunately none of the suggested people from our side has
hey Gurkan,
don't worry that much about the user-base. It will grow.
You guys are implementing a pretty new JSR. Once that is used more and
more in the industry,
the users will come to your project.
-Matthias
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi Bertrand;
>
>>>What's preve
On Sep 9, 2009, at 3:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Gurkan,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu> wrote:
...As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans
podling , it
takes too much days to release internal milestones of the project
What's preventing Op
All:
FYI, a new vote is beginning today on the RC3 candidate:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pivot-...@incubator.apache.org/msg03076.html.
This release candidate addresses issues that Sebb discovered with the RC2
candidate.
Thanks,
-T
Hi Bertrand;
>>What's preventing OpenWebBeans from graduating?
>>That's the best way of streamlining your release process.
Actually this is ongoing discussion in the openwebbeans dev list. There are two
solutions here, sub-project under Geronimo or TLP. But community are voted on
being a TLP. Th
Hi Leo,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> ... http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/guides/releasemanagement.xml?r1=805581&r2=805940
> ...
> ...The important new (to me) bit is "Nothing else belongs in the NOTICE
> document". Someone want to explain me
Hi Gurkan,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> ...As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans podling , it
> takes too much days to release internal milestones of the project
What's preventing OpenWebBeans from graduating?
That's the best way of streamlin
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 17:23 +0100, sebb wrote:
> > We have a source and binary distribution with the same NOTICE and
> > LICENSE texts in both artifacts. While we don't want/need to ship
> the
> > junit jar in the binary distribution (see CASSANDRA-417), shipping
> it in
> > the source artifact
On 09/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 22:28 +0100, sebb wrote:
> > Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for
> > testing? If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in
> > the binary release.
>
>
> We have a source and binary distributi
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 22:28 +0100, sebb wrote:
> Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for
> testing? If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in
> the binary release.
We have a source and binary distribution with the same NOTICE and
LICENSE texts in both
Since there have been several edits, can you repost the latest proposal?
Also, I'm looking forward to contribute and to help integrate any
changes needed to support OpenJPA for RFC 143.
Thanks,
Donald
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
2009/9/2 Leo Simons :
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jeremy Hughes
2009/9/2 Leo Simons :
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> We appreciate any feedback and comments on the proposal.
...
>
> * Projects that consist of groups of components often have some
> problems maintaining sufficient cohesion as a community. I hope you
> guys will give tha
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for
>> > testing?
>> > If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in the binary
>> >
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> (dropped cassandra-dev)
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote:
>>> Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with
>>> putting an acknowledgment in the NOTICE file. (putting te
(dropped cassandra-dev)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote:
>> Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with
>> putting an acknowledgment in the NOTICE file. (putting terms in the
>> LICENSE file that do not apply is bad, thou
On 09/09/2009, Todd Volkert wrote:
> Thank you very much everyone on the previous thread for the help with the
> intricacies of what goes in NOTICE and LICENSE. I think we've got the files
> to a good point, but before we tag the 1.3-rc3 candidate, I'd like a sanity
> check from those that kno
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> Thank you very much everyone on the previous thread for the help with the
> intricacies of what goes in NOTICE and LICENSE. I think we've got the files
> to a good point, but before we tag the 1.3-rc3 candidate, I'd like a sanity
> check f
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>>> Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going
>>> to be hard to get this release out !!!
>>
>> If by community you mean the IP
Thank you very much everyone on the previous thread for the help with the
intricacies of what goes in NOTICE and LICENSE. I think we've got the files
to a good point, but before we tag the 1.3-rc3 candidate, I'd like a sanity
check from those that know better than I :) If you can spare a moment,
Hello Jeremy,
Thanks! I'm still considering if it makes sense to add my name to the
list of initial committers to help out with this, but I will
definitely be following what's going on at Aries.
Greetings, Marcel
On Sep 9, 2009, at 13:09 , Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Hi Marcel, I agree it was a
Hi Marcel, I agree it was an oversight. I added the following to the
"Relationship with Other Apache Projects" section:
Apache Ace - http://incubator.apache.org/ace Apache ACE is a software
distribution framework that allows you to centrally manage and
distribute software components, configuration
On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing?
> > If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in the binary
> release.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans wrote:
...
> Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing?
> If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in the binary
> release.
Even if it is not in the release I believe there
2009/9/1 Niclas Hedhman :
...
> +1 for Incubation, btw. I might sign up as Mentor, if I can squeeze in the
> time...
Can I persuade you to sign up :-) ... we have two experienced ASF
members as mentors, but I think the additional perspective outside the
two companies putting the proposal forward wo
29 matches
Mail list logo
