On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons <m...@leosimons.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote: > > ... > > > Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing? > > If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in the binary > release. > > > Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with > putting an acknowledgment in the NOTICE file. (putting terms in the > LICENSE file that do not apply is bad, though). >
I think it's confusing, and NOTICE is supposed to be as minimal as possible. > > Is ANTLR actually needed at run-time, or is it only needed for > > building the code? > > I'm not sure whether it needs to be mentioned in NOTICE if it is only > > used at build-time. > > It should not be in the binary release if it's not needed at run-time. > > > Same comment -- it shouldn't hurt to have it in NOTICE. > > ciao, > > - Leo, who often gives credit to his stuffed animal wombat in NOTICE files > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
