APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
Hi,
On 4/3/07, Omar Tazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF
contribution (see proposal below).
[...]
Please cast your votes.
+1
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscrib
back to the votes: +1 (non-binding).
regards,
Martin
On 4/4/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey guys,
can we move these kind of discussions to a new thread?
This was the original vote thread and it might be hard to keep track
for those that wanna vote. Feel free to do ;-)
Hey Coach,
sounds cool. You still can cast your vote ;-)
Thx,
Matthias
On 4/5/07, Coach Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the explanation.
It looks like highly possible to integrate XAP with RCF/Trinidad. I'll
play with it and see how it goes.
> -Original Message---
On Thursday 05 April 2007 05:08, Craig L Russell wrote:
> I have a hard time understanding how a podling can consider itself
> ready for graduation without having anything worth sharing, and don't
> understand what the point is of having an audit of anything short of
> a build artifact.
Assu
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the explanation.
It looks like highly possible to integrate XAP with RCF/Trinidad. I'll
play with it and see how it goes.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Matthias Wessendorf
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 20
I have a hard time understanding how a podling can consider itself
ready for graduation without having anything worth sharing, and don't
understand what the point is of having an audit of anything short of
a build artifact.
Yes, that would be strange :) However, in the case of Wicket, we are
tal
IMHO the current process is fine but needs to be documented better.
Podlings should be encouraged to release stuff that they think is
usable outside their small world of developers who check out from svn
and build from source. The incubator is set up to review and approve
releases without passing
aargg
wicket community is divided again! Amsterdam or The Hague, The Hague or
Amsterdam!
Utrecht is also pretty nice! ;)
johan
On 4/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might be good to know that on 30th April, there is Queensday
> (Dutch guys know how to celebrate... :))
It
And people who want to stay in Amsterdam can also party all night..
See http://www.koninginnedagamsterdam.nl/?en for more info (yeah, Amsterdam has
an English page :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>> It might be good to know that on 30th April, there is Queensday
>> (Dutch guys know how
On Apr 4, 2007, at 1:54 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/4/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> Also, the whole idea of the Incubator is to
>> withhold releases from the general public.
No, the idea of the incubator is to ma
On 4/4/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> Also, the whole idea of the Incubator is to
>> withhold releases from the general public.
>
> Just to clarify - I don't think 'withhold' is a good description.
> Release - but with no specif
On 4/4/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, you are absolutely correct.
+1
On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> can we move these kind of discussions to a new thread?
> This was the original vote thread and it might be hard to keep track
> for tho
On 4/3/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We ask that you please vote to approve this "hotfix" release:
[X] +1 Approve the release of the "hotfix" artifact:
org.apache.uima.desceditor.2.1.0.incubating-hotfix-1.zip
[ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you
It might be a little bit too much flag waving for tourist, but in
general if the weather is nice, it can be a fun day. Be warned though,
Amsterdam will be *very* busy.
I bet !
Also good to know for the people ariving the day before (or earlier)
is that traditionally there is a big party the ni
Hey,
there is a session, called "Incubating Open Source Communities" by J.
Aaron Farr.
Is this a similar session, like we did in Austin? Or a *general*
session on the Apache Incubator?
(there is no link available on the website, therefore the mail...)
Thx,
Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http:
It might be good to know that on 30th April, there is Queensday
(Dutch guys know how to celebrate... :))
It might be a little bit too much flag waving for tourist, but in
general if the weather is nice, it can be a fun day. Be warned though,
Amsterdam will be *very* busy.
Also good to know for
Hi,
when you are planing to come to ApacheCon EU, you might also add your
name to this wiki page. It's possible to make car pools or share a
cab.
http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/WhoArrivesWhen
It might be good to know that on 30th April, there is Queensday
(Dutch guys know how to celebrate...
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 03:33, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Currently, there is only one active commiter (me) and no active mentors.
This causes some issues with the project. As a way of promoting the
project and possibly get more people interested in contributing, it's my
b
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It's a problem though, when there is only one committer on the code.
I encourage you to approach both the Tomcat and Jakarta communities to
attract some additional hackers!
We (Incubator PMC) won't permit a release when there are fewer than three
sets of eyeballs on t
On 4/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...In order to graduate, a podling is required to
build a release, if only it is a developer only release (take the
harmony podling as an example)...
Ok, I understand the intent better now, and I agree with it.
...What do you need for it
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> (FYI - were I a Java fan - I'd be there for you :) Certainly not biased
>> towards httpd-mod_ftp v.s. FtpServer - I think it's great that both are
>> at the ASF. Strictly my own language-bias.)
>
> I have the same language-bias (or is
On 4/4/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Perhaps the Incubator should introduce a "Release Simulation Procedure" which
EMULATES the real thing, a dry run, "run --verbose --no-output".
I like the idea, making it clear the releases are cut in "simulation
mode" would be good wh
Yoav Shapira wrote:
On 4/4/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I strongly think that Tomcat is your best ally here - in the same way
that
Niklas, speaking with my Tomcat hat on, you're definitely welcome to
join the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list and bounce your thoughts off t
On 4/4/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...there's no reason to
that the release candidate should be pulled immediately from the disk
if there's a chance we might get valuable feedback from it...
Agreed. But I thought (according to the thread subject) that you were
looking for +1s to
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Also, the whole idea of the Incubator is to
withhold releases from the general public.
Just to clarify - I don't think 'withhold' is a good description.
Release - but with no specific expectation of persistence at the
ASF is probably a bette
Hi,
> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 03:33, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>> Currently, there is only one active commiter (me) and no active mentors.
>> This causes some issues with the project. As a way of promoting the
>> project and possibly get more people interested in contributing, it's my
>> belie
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2007 03:33, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>> Currently, there is only one active commiter (me) and no active mentors.
>> This causes some issues with the project. As a way of promoting the
>> project and possibly get more people interested in contributing, i
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
> huh? The instructions [1] say "The project PMC needs to send an email to
> root". It doesn't say the "project PMC chair". Since root can easily
> verify pmc members from committee-info.txt [2], I don't see why any
> member of the PMC cannot submit the request.
Whoops :
Hi Matthias,
Sorry, you are absolutely correct.
Craig
On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hey guys,
can we move these kind of discussions to a new thread?
This was the original vote thread and it might be hard to keep track
for those that wanna vote. Feel free to do ;-)
On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Martin Ritchie wrote:
Thanks for this discussion. So just to clarify, anyone on the
PPMC can
request the account/karma setup just the IPMC needs to be CC'd as
well
as the usual PPMC on the root email.
infra
Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> I'd suggest you have the discussion about the future composition of the
> PMC as a group, using the dev list as a vehicle. You might find out that
> there are committers who would like to take part in the PMC.
I strongly suggest that you include all committers who have
Hey guys,
can we move these kind of discussions to a new thread?
This was the original vote thread and it might be hard to keep track
for those that wanna vote. Feel free to do ;-)
CU in Amsterdam ;)
-Matthias
On 4/4/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:33 AM, N
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Martin Ritchie wrote:
>
>>Thanks for this discussion. So just to clarify, anyone on the PPMC can
>>request the account/karma setup just the IPMC needs to be CC'd as well
>>as the usual PPMC on the root email.
>
> infra only acknowledges requests from the PMC chair (
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Also, the whole idea of the Incubator is to
> withhold releases from the general public.
Just to clarify - I don't think 'withhold' is a good description.
Release - but with no specific expectation of persistence at the
ASF is probably a better description. E.g. "here's
Martin Ritchie wrote:
>
> Thanks for this discussion. So just to clarify, anyone on the PPMC can
> request the account/karma setup just the IPMC needs to be CC'd as well
> as the usual PPMC on the root email.
infra only acknowledges requests from the PMC chair (iPMC chair in this
case). For proj
On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 23:58, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor.
Actually, according to Incubator policy [1] it's the other way
around.
"Upon acce
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 23:58, Craig L Russell wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor.
>
> Actually, according to Incubator policy [1] it's the other way around.
> "Upon acceptance by the Incubator PMC, the Podling's Mentor
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 03:33, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Currently, there is only one active commiter (me) and no active mentors.
> This causes some issues with the project. As a way of promoting the
> project and possibly get more people interested in contributing, it's my
> belief that we nee
On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process.
+1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I
understand,
if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't I
Hi Matt,
The last official act of the PPMC is to graduate the project from the
incubator. By that time, it should have learned how to govern itself.
While there is no policy, I believe that graduation is a good time to
take stock of the PPMC membership and committers and decide who will
b
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 22:09, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> This is not what (most) of the mentors and IPMC members here have
> voiced in the past. In order to graduate, a podling is required to
> build a release, if only it is a developer only release (take the
> harmony podling as an example).
P
+1
-jean
Marshall Schor wrote:
> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release
> org.apache.uima.desceditor.2.1.0.incubating-hotfix-1.zip .
> We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> approve this "hotfix" release.
>
> This release consists of 1 zip file containing a replacement for one o
On 4/4/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If there have been changes since the release was cut, a new release
must IMHO be created, so that people can vote (on the wicket lists
first, and then come back here) on the correct one.
Like Gwyn said, we'd rather wait until *all* feedb
On 04/04/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/31/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>.../src/testing/wicket-threadtest/src/main/java/wicket/threadtest/App2Test1.java
>
> Ai! A sandbox project that slipped our attention I'm afraid. Thanks
> for finding it. I fixed
On 4/4/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process.
>
> +1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand,
> if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don
On 4/4/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 11:10, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Is it standard practice to take the existing PPMC forward to the
> board or can the project, in its discretion, suggest a PMC made
> up of a different group of members?
The 'standard' pr
On 3/31/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>.../src/testing/wicket-threadtest/src/main/java/wicket/threadtest/App2Test1.java
Ai! A sandbox project that slipped our attention I'm afraid. Thanks
for finding it. I fixed it and added our unit test for header files to
that project.
If t
On 29/03/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/29/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> From my reading of the incubator PPMC guide, the guide only talks
> about the process up to the point where the PPMC votes to offer
> commit privileges to a new m
Hello Coach,
XAP does Ajax component wrapping on the client side in contrast to what
jMaki does on the server side. XAP is a 100% client side framework that
enables developers to write apps using a declarative XML syntax instead
of coding JavaScript. Different from JSF (which does processing on
50 matches
Mail list logo
