back to the votes: +1 (non-binding). regards,
Martin On 4/4/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey guys, can we move these kind of discussions to a new thread? This was the original vote thread and it might be hard to keep track for those that wanna vote. Feel free to do ;-) CU in Amsterdam ;) -Matthias On 4/4/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > > On Wednesday 04 April 2007 23:58, Craig L Russell wrote: > >> On Apr 3, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > > >>> AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor. > >> > >> Actually, according to Incubator policy [1] it's the other way > >> around. > >> "Upon acceptance by the Incubator PMC, the Podling's Mentor becomes a > >> member of the Incubator PMC (should they not already be one)." > > > > Doh!! Nit-picking are we ;o) > > Doh! Nitpicking is one of my specialties. > > > > > I claim complete insanity and temporal lobe confusion since Henning > > writes; "As a mentor", which should read as "As a future mentor" or > > "As a > > mentor candidate"... > > > > Craig, since I know you are a lot into Incubator docs, either tell > > me where to > > fix the 'typo' in that paragraph, or change the pluralis forms to; > > Sadly, the paragraph in question is in the Incubator policy page that > is still at [1]. In order to change it, an affirmative VOTE of the > IPMC is required. And it's hard to get a vote through... See [2] and > [3]. > > > > "the Podling's Mentors become members of the Incubator PMC (should > > they not > > already be one)." > > -----------^^^ > > Also, can "one" refer to "they" in english?? Should it be "that" > > instead? > > I'd say "Upon acceptance by the Incubator PMC, the Podling's Mentors > who are not already members, become members of the Incubator PMC." > > This needs to be a bigger change than one paragraph. There used to be > a mentor, but based on recent discussions in the Incubator, at least > three Mentors are recommended. But there's not been a change to the > Incubator policy or guides to reflect this. > > So you (or your designate ;-) will need to change a few places in the > Incubator in order to make it consistent. And then file an issue in > JIRA and call a VOTE. > > If you're going to be in Amsterdam for ApacheCon, we could get a > quorum of Incubator PMC and get some things done at the Hackathon. > Maybe advertise it as an Incubatorthon? > > Regards, > > Craig > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html > [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/ > 200702.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/ > 200702.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Cheers > > Niclas > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Craig Russell > DB PMC, OpenJPA PPMC > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://db.apache.org/jdo > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
