Craig L Russell wrote: > > I'd suggest you have the discussion about the future composition of the > PMC as a group, using the dev list as a vehicle. You might find out that > there are committers who would like to take part in the PMC.
I strongly suggest that you include all committers who have demonstrated sustained participation in the project in the PMC. If they decline to participate, you can strike them from that list before the resolution goes to the board. But a PMC is the 'owner' and trustee of the code, and all sustained contributors should have a voice there. Even at httpd, we have only a 3-6 mos sustained activity requirement to obtain commit access, and an additional 6 mos sustained activity reqm't to become a PMC member. In the past 7 or 8 years, only a tiny handful of individuals declined to become a PMC member for very specific reasons. And httpd is considered the extreme end of the spectrum, many incubator podlings are adding folks to committer + PPMC from the moment they've shown sustained activity. Bill --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
