On 4/4/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 11:10, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Is it standard practice to take the existing PPMC forward to the
> board or can the project, in its discretion, suggest a PMC made
> up of a different group of members?
The 'standard' practice is that the PPMC is moved forward to the new TLP
project's PMC. It has also been 'standard' that the committers are kept
as-is. However, some communities have arranged for 'clean up' operations
prior to the graduation proposal in collaboration with the Incubator PMC.
AFAIK, this is done in discussion with the people involved to limit any bad
feelings. End of the day, the purpose has been to keep the 'active'
community. But there are no policy in place (AFAIK).
Discussions has occured whether 'previous to ASF active' people should be
committers or not. I don't think there are any definite conclusion on that,
and handled case by case.
+1
though not a requirement, if the lists don't tally questions may be
asked and explanations made which takes time. so, i recommend a quick
tidy up operation on the PPMC so that the final list is the same as
the proposal list.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
