Re: Proposal for xml-bean exit criteria

2003-07-31 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/31/03 9:10 PM, "Ted Leung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/31/2003 5:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:50:22PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote: >> >> >>> ... >>> Legal (these should be done before code comes into the incubator, but >>> I'm including them for completeness)

Re: Proposal for xml-bean exit criteria

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Leung
On 7/31/2003 5:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:50:22PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote: ... Legal (these should be done before code comes into the incubator, but I'm including them for completeness) All code ASL'ed No non ASL or ASL compatbile dependencies in the code base I'

Re: Proposal for xml-bean exit criteria

2003-07-31 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:16:38PM -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > On 7/31/03 8:14 PM, "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:50:22PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote: >... > >>project is integrated with Gump > > > > and/or Maven? > > Maven should not be a requirement.

Re: Proposal for xml-bean exit criteria

2003-07-31 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/31/03 8:14 PM, "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:50:22PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote: >> ... >> Legal (these should be done before code comes into the incubator, but >> I'm including them for completeness) >> All code ASL'ed >> No non ASL or ASL compatbile de

Re: Proposal for xml-bean exit criteria

2003-07-31 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 03:50:22PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote: >... > Legal (these should be done before code comes into the incubator, but > I'm including them for completeness) > All code ASL'ed > No non ASL or ASL compatbile dependencies in the code base I'm not parsing this one right. Did you

RE: Proposal for xml-bean exit criteria

2003-07-31 Thread Eric Vasilik
More specifically, with respect to the exit criteria: Replacement of LGPL Piccolo parser with Xerces. I will be creating a late-bound (reflection) relationship with Piccolo which will not require Piccolo to be present at compile time (to not break existing functionality). In lieu of Piccol

Re: request to accept new project: wsrp4j

2003-07-31 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 07:06:13PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Ted Leung wrote: > > I'm unclear as to the project destination here. Your message says its > > WS and the proposal > > says Jakarta. I just looked and couldn't find it. I also couldn't find > > it in [EMAIL PROTECTED] A

Re: request to accept new project: wsrp4j

2003-07-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Ted, Ken, The dependent project was the JSR168 Impl which is Jetspeed2 (already in our CVS). There's no other dependencies that i know of. Ted, Yes, we've not voted on it yet in the WS-PMC. I will start the VOTE and get the results back to incubator folks. Thanks, dims --- Ted Leung <[EMAIL P

Re: request to accept new project: wsrp4j

2003-07-31 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Ted Leung wrote: > > I'm unclear as to the project destination here. Your message says its > WS and the proposal > says Jakarta. I just looked and couldn't find it. I also couldn't find > it in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > As long has voted to accept it, I've no problem. It's just that I'm on > th

Re: request to accept new project: wsrp4j

2003-07-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
FYI, AFAIK Charon depends on JSR168 Impl - jetspeed2 (code checked in just a few days ago - http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-jetspeed-2/). So we should not have a problem. Thanks, dims --- Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ibm has a codebase that they want to open through

Proposal for xml-bean exit criteria

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Leung
Hi folks, Steven rightly pointed out that we are lacking a firm set of exit criteria, so I'm going to take a stab at it. I didn't find a set for either Tapestry or Lenya, so I"m just making this up (I did find criteria for entering the incubator, though). If I messed the prior art, I trust so

Re: request to accept new project: wsrp4j

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Leung
On 7/31/2003 2:30 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: they are ready to dot the eyes and cross the teas; they are assembling the clas, will be executing the software grant as soon as i get it to them, they have a community of developers, they have a sponsoring asf project (web services) which is eag

request to accept new project: wsrp4j

2003-07-31 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
ibm has a codebase that they want to open through the asf. the detailed proposal has already been posted on the apache wiki at http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?CharonProposal by sam, several months ago. they are ready to dot the eyes and cross the teas; they are assembling the clas, w

RE: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On Thursday, July 31, 2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote: > On 31/07/2003 21:32 Ted Leung wrote: > >> On 7/31/2003 9:08 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: >> >>> I think adding folks as committers is fine, but only *active* >>> committers (people who actually vote AND commit code into the code >>> base)

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Steven Noels
On 31/07/2003 21:32 Ted Leung wrote: On 7/31/2003 9:08 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: I think adding folks as committers is fine, but only *active* committers (people who actually vote AND commit code into the code base) should count towards judging vitality. +1 I (joyfully and without bad feeli

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/31/03 4:44 PM, "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 31/07/2003 22:39 Ted Leung wrote: >> On 7/31/2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote: >> >>> I (joyfully and without bad feelings) rest my case. Stil do expect me >>> popping up on the list addressing the issues I had in mind when >>> in

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Leung
On 7/31/2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote: I (joyfully and without bad feelings) rest my case. Stil do expect me popping up on the list addressing the issues I had in mind when inviting myself, of course. You are always welcome to do so. After all, the XML PMC will still need to agree w/ the In

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Steven Noels
On 31/07/2003 22:39 Ted Leung wrote: On 7/31/2003 1:34 PM, Steven Noels wrote: I (joyfully and without bad feelings) rest my case. Stil do expect me popping up on the list addressing the issues I had in mind when inviting myself, of course. You are always welcome to do so. After all, the XML

Re: XMLBeans incubation status file

2003-07-31 Thread kkress
Maybe I only thought I did ;-> I just faxed it. Ken. -- Ken Kress [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAS, The Bank of New York484.605.4834 Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/31/2003 03:37 PM Please respond to general To:

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/31/03 1:41 PM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew C. Oliver wrote, On 31/07/2003 18.08: > >> No this did not happen with POI. Stefano was added as a mentor but never >> acted as a committer, > > He had commit access IIRC. Well, it happens most of the time AFAIK that

Re: XMLBeans incubation status file

2003-07-31 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
TIPS: The current Apache Committers who faxed the Contributor License Agreement to the ASF are listed on the Jim's http://www.apache.org/~jim/committers.html page and their names are in italics. This page will be updated non-regularly ;-) -- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Ted Leung
On 7/31/2003 9:08 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: I think adding folks as committers is fine, but only *active* committers (people who actually vote AND commit code into the code base) should count towards judging vitality. +1 - T

RE: XMLBeans incubation status file

2003-07-31 Thread Eric Vasilik
Hello, My name is Eric Vasilik, and I'm one of the original developers of XmlBeans within BEA. I am primarily responsible for the architecture and implementation of the XML store and XmlCursor. I will be moving the XmlBeans source code into the Apache CVS. In order to ensure a smooth transi

RE: XMLBeans incubation status file

2003-07-31 Thread kkress
Cliff, I faxed my Contributor License Agreement to ASF a while back. Unless I hear otherwise, I think I'm good to go. Ken. -- Ken Kress [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAS, The Bank of New York484.605.4834 "Cliff Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: XMLBeans incubation status file

2003-07-31 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:57 PM, Ted Leung wrote: > Hi folks, > > Here's the contents of the incubator/projects/xmlbeans/STATUS file. > It's a snapshot of where we are in the > overall incubation process. Please add/delete and comment > > Ted > > Tasks for XMLBeans incubation. > > * Defi

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Andrew C. Oliver wrote, On 31/07/2003 18.08: On 7/31/03 10:19 AM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 31/07/2003 16.13: ... AFAIK usually a couple of mentors are added to the committers list. This happened with POI AFAIK for example. I would keep this, as i

RE: XMLBeans incubation status file

2003-07-31 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:55 PM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > Hello, XMLBeans folks > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:57:03 -0700 > (Subject: XMLBeans incubation status file) > Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Here's the contents of the incubator/projects/xmlbeans/STATUS file. >> It's a snaps

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/31/03 10:19 AM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 31/07/2003 16.13: > >> Berin, >> >> Personally, I'm undecided about Steven Noels request to become >> a committer. In the same way that I am a relative unknown to >> you, Steven and Ted are new

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 31/07/2003 16.13: Berin, Personally, I'm undecided about Steven Noels request to become a committer. In the same way that I am a relative unknown to you, Steven and Ted are new acquaintances. In fact, all of the current committers are new acquaintances to me. So my dil

Re: Invitation to xmlbeans-dev

2003-07-31 Thread kkress
Berin, Personally, I'm undecided about Steven Noels request to become a committer. In the same way that I am a relative unknown to you, Steven and Ted are new acquaintances. In fact, all of the current committers are new acquaintances to me. So my dilemma is do I say, "Bring 'em on, the more the m

Re: [VOTE] Policy for incubating project resources (was Re: xmlbeansproject )

2003-07-31 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Aaron Bannert wrote: I noticed that you think the incubator PMC is responsible for doing the *work* of incubation. That is a false assumption. The Incubator is a place where new projects can be incubated. The contributors to the Incubator are those people who want to accomplish incubation. Anyon