Re: [Oltu[OpenIDConnect] Using Apache Oltu OpenID Connect as a maven dependency

Hi Oltu is a retired project, meaning that there were no active developers. This means that Oltu will not be updated, and there are nobody available to respond to your questions. Sorry Jan I. Chair of Attic > El 6 may 2018, a las 20:30, Hasini Witharana > escribió: > > Hi all, > > I want

Re: getting a svn2git mirror Git repository (read-only for now)

> El 6 may 2018, a las 12:01, Hervé BOUTEMY escribió: > > I'd like to prepare a Git mirror of our Attic site svn repo: that would be > useful as a general contribution helper for people more used to Git than svn > (which happens more and more these times) > > and this would prepare an eventu

Re: idea for site maintenance simplification

Sent from my iPad > On 5 May 2018, at 11:52, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Le samedi 5 mai 2018, 07:39:02 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 5 May 2018, at 06:25, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I

Re: idea for site maintenance simplification

Sent from my iPad > On 5 May 2018, at 06:25, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Hi, > > I took time to read the whole discussions from april and understand what was > the common objective, and what were solutions envisioned and discussed and > partly done and partly with consensus yet to be found. >

Re: Discussion to select chair candidates followed by a vote starting may 13 2018.

> On 2 May 2018, at 11:49, sebb wrote: > > On 2 May 2018 at 10:33, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >>> On 2 May 2018, at 11:09, sebb wrote: >>> >>> Top-posting. >>> >>> Surely any discussion which relates to personnel should ta

Re: Discussion to select chair candidates followed by a vote starting may 13 2018.

deny me the right to give reasons why I am leaving this project. Actually your email just confirms my decision. rgds Jan I. > > On 1 May 2018 at 21:46, Jan Iversen wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am truly sorry having to write this email. I am embarrassed of not being >>

Re: Discussion to select chair candidates followed by a vote starting may 13 2018.

Sent from my iPad > On 2 May 2018, at 07:43, Henk P. Penning wrote: > >> On Tue, 1 May 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 22:46:41 +0200 >> From: Jan Iversen >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Discussion to select ch

Discussion to select chair candidates followed by a vote starting may 13 2018.

Hi I am truly sorry having to write this email. I am embarrassed of not being able to keep my promise and stay as a long-term chair, but sometimes you have to ask yourself is it worth the time spent and instead use time where it is makes a difference. Considering we have a very silent communit

Re: attic-test.git created

Sent from my iPad > On 30 Apr 2018, at 22:28, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Le lundi 30 avril 2018, 21:03:24 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 30 Apr 2018, at 20:43, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >>> >>> I don't get wh

Re: attic-test.git created

egards, > > Hervé > > Le lundi 30 avril 2018, 19:39:16 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : >> Hi >> >> We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, which >> I cannot relay here due to apache policy (which I agree with). >> >> I can

Re: attic-test.git created

Sent from my iPad >> On 30 Apr 2018, at 20:00, sebb wrote: >> >> On 30 April 2018 at 18:39, Jan Iversen wrote: >> Hi >> >> We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, which >> I cannot relay here due to apache policy

attic-test.git created

Hi We just received an email that attic-test.git is created, on private, which I cannot relay here due to apache policy (which I agree with). I can however relay my response, what apart from a “thank you” was a call to all: “I must however state that the word “consensus” seems to mean nothing

Re: discussion/vote new site (again, but last time from me)

Sent from my iPad > On 30 Apr 2018, at 14:34, sebb wrote: > >> On 30 April 2018 at 08:29, Henk P. Penning wrote: >>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: >>> >>> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 19:53:45 +0200 >>> From: Jan Iversen >>> To:

Re: discussion/vote new site (again, but last time from me)

Sent from my iPad > On 30 Apr 2018, at 03:10, sebb wrote: > >> On 29 April 2018 at 18:53, Jan Iversen wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Based on a suggestion from Henk, I hereby once again try to start a >> discussion/vote on the new site. >> >> We

discussion/vote new site (again, but last time from me)

Hi. Based on a suggestion from Henk, I hereby once again try to start a discussion/vote on the new site. We need to select either lua-site or jekyll-site. I strongly believe there are no reasons to polish the sites more before selecting, it is apparent how both sites will work. I hope sincere

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

> On 29 Apr 2018, at 08:23, Henk P. Penning wrote: > >> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:44:45 +0200 >> From: Jan Iversen >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdoc

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 22:50, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 19:44:45 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 28 Apr 2018, at 18:10, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >>> >>> Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 15

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 18:10, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 15:07:34 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : >> Sent from my iPad >> >>>> On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:56, sebb wrote: >>>> On 28 April 2018 at 13:45, Jan Ivers

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:56, sebb wrote: > >> On 28 April 2018 at 13:45, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>>> On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:28, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> On 28 Apr

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 14:28, sebb wrote: > >> On 28 April 2018 at 13:06, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 28 Apr 2018, at 13:07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >>> >>> oh, I was just trying to

Re: svn commit: r1830437 - /attic/site/xdocs/flagged/

Please do not change the current procedure, until we have agreed on a new one. This change is not followed if you read process.html rgds jan i Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 13:42, hbout...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: hboutemy > Date: Sat Apr 28 11:42:38 2018 > New Revision: 1830437

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

tp://svn.apache.org/viewvc/attic/site/ > > Le samedi 28 avril 2018, 12:54:40 CEST Jan Iversen a écrit : >> Isn’t it a bit premature to change the process ? Seen from pow we are >> experimenting with at least 3 proposals of which 1 does not need a >> buildbot. >> >&g

Re: Move attic to git,

.sh > copies the content to docs, then the result will be the same. This will just > give cleaner separation between source and generated spaces > +1 could be a second repo or a submodule. rds jan i > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 26 avril 2018, 08:28:58 CEST Jan

Re: svn commit: r1830424 - /attic/site/xdocs/process.xml

Isn’t it a bit premature to change the process ? Seen from pow we are experimenting with at least 3 proposals of which 1 does not need a buildbot. This is of course just my opinion. rgds jan I Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 12:33, hbout...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: hboutemy > Date

Re: Request GitBox access for Attic?

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 00:09, sebb wrote: > >> On 27 April 2018 at 17:57, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 27 Apr 2018, at 17:17, sebb wrote: >>> >>> I think it would be useful to have

Re: new sites and swarm of commits.

Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2018, at 00:15, sebb wrote: > >> On 27 April 2018 at 18:01, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>>> On 27 Apr 2018, at 16:30, Henk P. Penning wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 27

Re: new sites and swarm of commits.

Sent from my iPad > On 27 Apr 2018, at 16:30, Henk P. Penning wrote: > >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:04:50 +0200 >> From: Jan Iversen >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Re: n

Re: Request GitBox access for Attic?

Sent from my iPad > On 27 Apr 2018, at 17:17, sebb wrote: > > I think it would be useful to have an Attic GitBox test instance so we > can try out things like Buildbot scripts and online editing. > > It might also be a good way to evaluate the pros and cons of the > various redesigns. > Sort

Re: new sites and swarm of commits.

Sent from my iPad > On 27 Apr 2018, at 14:46, Henk P. Penning wrote: > >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 13:39:16 +0200 >> From: Jan Iversen >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: new sites and swarm of com

new sites and swarm of commits.

Hi It is amazing how many commits Henk and Sebb can produce, I have lost track long ago about the status of things, with one exception I see both proposals having growing complexity (now e.g. both use yaml) most of the complexity seems to arise in order to be to be able to handle situations in

Re: svn commit: r1830185 - /attic/site-lua/docs/OUT

and I forgot I still need to find a good yaml validator online, so I do not commit obvious mistakes. rgds jan i Sent from my iPad > On 26 Apr 2018, at 14:52, Henk P. Penning wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:32:31 +0

Re: svn commit: r1830185 - /attic/site-lua/docs/OUT

Sent from my iPad > On 26 Apr 2018, at 14:52, Henk P. Penning wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:32:31 +0200 >> From: Jan Iversen >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r18301

Re: svn commit: r1830185 - /attic/site-lua/docs/OUT

Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Apr 2018, at 13:25, sebb wrote: > >> On 26 April 2018 at 12:01, Henk P. Penning wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, he...@apache.org wrote: >>> >>> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:37:14 +0200 >>> From: he...@apache.org >>> To: general@attic.apache.org >>> Subject: svn commi

Move attic to git,

Hi Any objections against moving attic to git ? using github enables online file editing/committing, and thus removes the need for terminal access. I have not found similar possibilities with svn. I will let this be open until 2 may, and then continue of course unless we have an open discussi

Re: Buildbot now working, but checkin not enabled

> On 24 Apr 2018, at 17:29, sebb wrote: > > The buildbot job attic-site [1] is now working. > > It does the following: > - checkout attic/site (fresh) > - rm -rf docs/projects > - runs ./build.sh > - svn add docs -force > - svn commit (currently disabled) Is a svn commit really the only way to

Re: svn commit: r1829959 - /attic/site-jekyll/src/_data/projects.json

> On 24 Apr 2018, at 15:38, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 11:58:10 +0200 >> From: Jan Iversen >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1829959 - >> /attic/site-je

Re: svn commit: r1829959 - /attic/site-jekyll/src/_data/projects.json

> On 24 Apr 2018, at 12:16, sebb wrote: > > On 24 April 2018 at 10:58, Jan Iversen <mailto:j...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 24 Apr 2018, at 11:49, sebb wrote: >>> >>>> On 24 April 2018 a

Re: svn commit: r1829959 - /attic/site-jekyll/src/_data/projects.json

Sent from my iPad > On 24 Apr 2018, at 11:49, sebb wrote: > >> On 24 April 2018 at 05:52, wrote: >> Author: henkp >> Date: Tue Apr 24 04:52:50 2018 >> New Revision: 1829959 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1829959&view=rev >> Log: >> rm tab (illegal) > > The text was updated to

Re: svn commit: r1829899 - in /attic/site-jekyll/src: _data/projects.json _layouts/project.html

> On 23 Apr 2018, at 18:20, sebb wrote: > > On 23 April 2018 at 17:16, Jan Iversen wrote: >> Hi >> >> You are continuing along the same line as with “issues", “scm” makes a lot >> of assumption how/where the code is stored. >> >> My

Re: svn commit: r1829899 - in /attic/site-jekyll/src: _data/projects.json _layouts/project.html

Hi You are continuing along the same line as with “issues", “scm” makes a lot of assumption how/where the code is stored. My preference is really just to have the url, that is generic. Why are you against that ? rgds Jan I. > On 23 Apr 2018, at 18:14, s...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: se

Re: svn commit: r1829897 - in /attic/site-jekyll/src: _data/projects.json _layouts/project.html _plugins/generate_projects.rb

Having 2 fields “jira” and “bugzilla” is not simpler than having a simple url in “issues”. And someday we might see a project being retired that uses its own bugzilla (there are at least one project with very little activity, that uses its own version). The same argument goes for the fields “w

Re: svn commit: r1829888 - in /attic/site-jekyll/src: _data/projects.json _layouts/project.html _plugins/generate_projects.rb

Please when you add fields, add them to all objects. That way it is possible to simply copy an object. Alternatively the json should have a template object with all possible fields. Problem is we forget what fields are available if there are no easy reminder.copy from another object or a t

Re: Index.lua script (was: svn commit: r1829853 - in /attic/site: docs/projects/oltu.html xdocs/projects/oltu.xml)

> On 23 Apr 2018, at 13:15, sebb AT ASF wrote: > > On 23 April 2018 at 12:07, Henk P. Penning wrote: > >> Hi Sebb, >> >> I created an 'index.lua' script for attic.a.o ; >> >> -- only some 130 lines >> -- it creates the index and projects/ pages for attic.a.o >> -- I added one or two 'di

Re: New maintenance.

Sent from my iPad > On 23 Apr 2018, at 00:46, sebb wrote: > >> On 22 April 2018 at 15:53, Henk P. Penning wrote: >>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, j...@apache.org wrote: >>> >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:52 +0200 >>> From: j...@apache.org >>> To: general@attic.apache.org >>> Subject: New maintenan

Re: New maintenance.

Sent from my iPad > On 23 Apr 2018, at 00:29, sebb wrote: > >> On 22 April 2018 at 15:48, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >>> On 22 Apr 2018, at 16:41, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On 22 April 2018 at 14:53, mailto:j...@apache.org>> >>>

Re: New maintenance.

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 16:53, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, j...@apache.org wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:53:52 +0200 >> From: j...@apache.org >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: New maintenance. > >> Based on site-json I propose the following changes: >> >> C

Re: New maintenance.

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 16:41, sebb wrote: > > On 22 April 2018 at 14:53, mailto:j...@apache.org>> wrote: >> Hi >> >> Looking at the latest emails, it seems like a compromise between the 2 >> solutions are the best solution. >> >> How about if the combine the proposals to the following (that w

Re: svn commit: r1829770 - in /attic/site-json: build.props build.sh build.xml docs/projects/ lib/ xdocs/

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 16:24, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 14:34:29 +0200 >> From: Jan Iversen >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1829770 - in /attic/site-json: build

Re: svn commit: r1829770 - in /attic/site-json: build.props build.sh build.xml docs/projects/ lib/ xdocs/

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 14:29, sebb wrote: > > On 22 April 2018 at 13:04, Henk P. Penning > wrote: >> On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, sebb wrote: >> >>> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 13:53:15 +0200 >>> From: sebb >>> To: general@attic.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1829770 - in /a

Re: svn commit: r1829770 - in /attic/site-json: build.props build.sh build.xml docs/projects/ lib/ xdocs/

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 12:41, s...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: sebb > Date: Sun Apr 22 10:41:16 2018 > New Revision: 1829770 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1829770&view=rev > Log: > Reduce to proposed source files > > Removed: >attic/site-json/build.props >attic/site-json/bu

Re: Discussion on proposed solutions for simplified maintenance.

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 11:33, sebb wrote: > > On 22 April 2018 at 09:54, Jan Iversen <mailto:jancasacon...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> On 22 Apr 2018, at 10:17, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On 21 April 2018 at 12:57, wrote: >>>>

Re: Second proposal for new site maintenance.

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 11:27, sebb wrote: > > On 22 April 2018 at 09:51, Jan Iversen <mailto:jancasacon...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> On 22 Apr 2018, at 09:43, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On 20 April 2018 at 12:11, wrote: >>>>

Re: Discussion on proposed solutions for simplified maintenance.

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 10:17, sebb wrote: > > On 21 April 2018 at 12:57, wrote: >> Hi. >> >> After having studied the solution proposed by Sebb, I have decided to add my >> proposal again. >> >> My proposal has one outstanding TODO: >> - add a .htaccess to projects that catches * and redirec

Re: Second proposal for new site maintenance.

> On 22 Apr 2018, at 09:43, sebb wrote: > > On 20 April 2018 at 12:11, wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have given some thought to the proposal by Sebb that replaces my proposal. >> >> There have been on/off talks over a long time about simplifying the >> maintenance, common for the talks are the wish

Re: Site generation ideas - JSON and Jekyll

Sent from my iPad > On 19 Apr 2018, at 22:22, sebb wrote: > >> On 19 April 2018 at 21:08, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>>> On 19 Apr 2018, at 22:02, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> On 19 Apr

Re: Site generation ideas - JSON and Jekyll

Sent from my iPad > On 19 Apr 2018, at 22:02, sebb wrote: > >> On 19 April 2018 at 19:41, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>>> On 19 Apr 2018, at 17:10, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> On 19 April 2018 at

Re: Site generation ideas - JSON and Jekyll

Sent from my iPad > On 19 Apr 2018, at 17:10, sebb wrote: > >> On 19 April 2018 at 13:27, sebb wrote: >> I have done some further investigation of using JSON and Jekyll. >> >> I think JSON is not the best format for maintenance. >> This is because it is messy including chunks of text (e.g. f

Re: Site generation ideas - JSON and Jekyll

Sent from my iPad > On 19 Apr 2018, at 17:10, sebb wrote: > >> On 19 April 2018 at 13:27, sebb wrote: >> I have done some further investigation of using JSON and Jekyll. >> >> I think JSON is not the best format for maintenance. >> This is because it is messy including chunks of text (e.g. f

Re: Sample Jekyll implementation

> On 18 Apr 2018, at 03:04, sebb wrote: > > The SVN tree under: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/attic/site-test > > has a sample implementation of the site generation using Jekyll > > This uses projects.json to create the list of projects for the RH side > of pages as well as generating

Re: New website proposal

Sent from my iPad >> On 17 Apr 2018, at 14:52, sebb wrote: >> >> On 17 April 2018 at 13:35, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>>> On 17 Apr 2018, at 14:22, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> On 17 April

Re: New website proposal

Sent from my iPad > On 17 Apr 2018, at 14:22, sebb wrote: > >> On 17 April 2018 at 13:04, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >>> On 17 Apr 2018, at 13:55, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On 17 April 2018 at 11:59, Jan Iversen >> <mailto

Re: svn commit: r1829195 - /attic/site/docs/projects.json

> On 17 Apr 2018, at 14:00, sebb wrote: > > On 17 April 2018 at 12:03, Jan Iversen <mailto:j...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 17 Apr 2018, at 12:57, sebb wrote: >>> >>>> On 15 April 2018

Re: New website proposal

> On 17 Apr 2018, at 13:55, sebb wrote: > > On 17 April 2018 at 11:59, Jan Iversen <mailto:j...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On 17 Apr 2018, at 12:53, sebb wrote: >>> >>>> On 15 Apr

Re: svn commit: r1829195 - /attic/site/docs/projects.json

Sent from my iPad > On 17 Apr 2018, at 12:57, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 April 2018 at 09:38, wrote: >> Author: jani >> Date: Sun Apr 15 08:38:21 2018 >> New Revision: 1829195 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1829195&view=rev >> Log: >> projects.json is moved in scripts/attic.js >> t

Re: New website proposal

Sent from my iPad > On 17 Apr 2018, at 12:53, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 April 2018 at 10:42, Jan Iversen wrote: >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>>> On 15 Apr 2018, at 11:37, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> On 15 April 20

Re: New website proposal

Sent from my iPad > On 15 Apr 2018, at 11:37, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 April 2018 at 10:03, wrote: >> Hi >> >> Please have a look at >> http://attic.apache.org/test.html >> >> This is a “new” homepage. The only real new thing is that I got rid of “ant” >>

Re: WARN: project from a retired committee but PMC not changed to Attic in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oltu/site/doap_org.apache.oltu.parent.rdf

I like to get an email from infra about needed changes, when the Infra ticket to give us permission is still open: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16309 Gmcdonald wrote in a comment, that he will do it. rgds Jan I. > On 14 Apr 2

projects.json

Hi I surrender !!! I have now made a projects.json, and while doing so corrected a number of errors on the existing pages. Patches are more than welcome. Regards Jan I

Re: Sorry for the noise

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 12:30, sebb wrote: > > On 13 April 2018 at 11:22, Jan Iversen <mailto:jancasacon...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >>> On 13 Apr 2018, at 12:17, sebb mailto:seb...@gmail.com>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 1

Re: Flagging Wikis as retired

Currently the process is to create a INFRA-Jira that makes the wiki RO, I am not sure we need more than that, but have nothing against if it can be automated. Please remember the wiki can any of a handful of types, so the Lua might be a bit complex. rgds Jan I. > On 13 Apr 2018, at 12:24, seb

Re: Sorry for the noise

> On 13 Apr 2018, at 12:17, sebb wrote: > > On 13 April 2018 at 11:08, wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Sorry for the noise on this list, I am trying to simplify the website, >> meaning getting rid of the ant generation. > > What's wrong with Ant ? > Or do you mean Velocity (Anakia, Texen)? I mean t

Re: process

Done. Nice work ! rgds Jan I > On 13 Apr 2018, at 07:46, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > Hi Jan, > > can you please update the 'process page' ? > > -- after 2.5 "Create project page ..." add (as one bullit) : > mkdir flagged/${project}.apache.org ; > touch flagged/${project}.apache.org/

Re: += scripts/

of course, no problem. rgds jan i Sent from my iPad > On 11 Apr 2018, at 08:06, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > Hi, > > I will add a scripts/ directory to the attic-site shortly, > for the script that adds a banner to retired TLP sites. > > Hope that's OK ; regards, Henk Penning > > -

Re: [jira] [Created] (ATTIC-168) move oltu to attic

Hi I thought at the new dist idea would solve it, but I have added it to https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-16310 Btw, I got 9 mails from jira about you updating the ticket :-) Have a nice day. rgds Jan I

Re: [jira] [Created] (ATTIC-168) move oltu to attic

Last task in moving oltu to attic is all yours :-) rgds jan i Sent from my iPad > On 1 Apr 2018, at 16:46, Jan Iversen wrote: > > Ok will (not) do :-) > > Jan I > >> On 1 Apr 2018, at 11:14, Henk P. Penning wrote: >> >> On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, jan iversen

[jira] [Updated] (ATTIC-168) move oltu to attic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jan iversen updated ATTIC-168: -- Description: i. Update website with Attic notice: [http://o|http://$/]ltu.apache.org/ ==> Henk (

[jira] [Updated] (ATTIC-168) move oltu to attic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jan iversen updated ATTIC-168: -- Description: Obtain source control karma and point source control mails to general at attic i. Update

[jira] [Updated] (ATTIC-168) move oltu to attic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jan iversen updated ATTIC-168: -- Description: Inform users of the move to the Attic Create project page on Attic site: [http

Re: [jira] [Created] (ATTIC-168) move oltu to attic

Ok will (not) do :-) Jan I > On 1 Apr 2018, at 11:14, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, jan iversen (JIRA) wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:15:00 +0100 >> From: "jan iversen (JIRA)" >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: [

[jira] [Created] (ATTIC-168) move oltu to attic

jan iversen created ATTIC-168: - Summary: move oltu to attic Key: ATTIC-168 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-168 Project: Attic Issue Type: Task Reporter: jan iversen

Re: Project moving to ATTIC

RO. You are of course free to copy the items, either for personal use, or to start a new project. Rgds Jan Iversen. Sent from my iPad > On 7 Mar 2018, at 23:51, Jorge Martín Cuervo wrote: > > Hello Jan, > > I am succesfully using ACE within a personal project since more than

Re: Getting XMLBeans out of the attic

would likely be affected by >>> the >>> same issue. Making the XMLBeans update within the POI source code or POI >>> maven coordinates would make it more difficult for others to find this >>> update. >>> >>> If we had to change the Java packag

Re: Getting XMLBeans out of the attic

POI source code or POI >> maven coordinates would make it more difficult for others to find this >> update. >> >> If we had to change the Java package name to >> org.apache.poi.internal.xmlbeans, it would take a bit of trickery to >> allow >> users to c

Re: new PMC for xmlbeans

Sent from my iPad > On 2 Mar 2018, at 14:59, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Apache POI is used by Apache Tika and Apache SOLR. > The XmlBeans build is pretty complicated and outdated and changing its > package names is going to be fairly hard (in short, XmlBeans is used to > autogenerate some of the

Re: Redirects for attic project download directories

> The objection to the rm's of the /dist/GHOST/ directories was the loss > of redirects caused by the /dist/GHOST/.htaccess files. > > -- On www.a.o this is now fixed with rewrite rules in the config > for "www.a.o/dist/". > -- On GHOST.apache.org, the refs to

Re: Remove old projects (more than 4 year in ATTIC)

On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 21:26, sebb wrote: > On 15 February 2018 at 20:16, jan iversen wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 20:43, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 15 February 2018 at 18:31, jan iversen > wrote: > >> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 19:24, sebb wrote: >

Re: Remove old projects (more than 4 year in ATTIC)

On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 20:43, sebb wrote: > On 15 February 2018 at 18:31, jan iversen wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 19:24, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 15 February 2018 at 13:11, jan iversen > wrote: > >> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 12:05, sebb wrote

Re: Remove old projects (more than 4 year in ATTIC)

On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 19:24, sebb wrote: > On 15 February 2018 at 13:11, jan iversen wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 at 12:05, sebb wrote: > > > >> Just in case it is not obvious, I am -1 to the removal of the > >> .htaccess files under old retired TL

Remove old projects (more than 4 year in ATTIC)

ons or comments ? If not majority “wins” and the ticket will be reopened sometime next week. have a nice weekend. rgds jan i > > > > > On 14 February 2018 at 14:52, sebb wrote: > > On 14 February 2018 at 12:55, Henk P. Penning wrote: > >> On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, jan ive

Re: project ACE.

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 at 10:16, Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > > I will "roll my own" if there is no wider interest ; that's ok. > > Here are the dates I gleaned from the attic pages : > > moved to attic before 2014-02-14 ; 4 years ago : >

Re: project ACE.

On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 12:52, Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, jan iversen wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 at 12:40, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > Hi, > > >>PS To get the "attic'ed" project list, I parse > >> > >> svn

Re: project ACE.

Hi again. Could you possibly provide a clue to what is the problem with delta cloud, just had a look on web site / comedy etc, and it seems ok ? rgds jan I On 6 February 2018 at 12:50, jan iversen wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 at 12:40, Henk P. Penning wrote: > >> On Tue,

Re: project ACE.

On Tue, 6 Feb 2018 at 12:40, Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Tue, 6 Feb 2018, jan iversen wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 12:01:10 +0100 > > From: jan iversen > > To: general@attic.apache.org > > Subject: project ACE. > > Hi Jan, > > > Project ACE is

project ACE.

Project ACE is now finally retired (I had some severe problems with git pull requests, but Infra saw my pain and helped me). I have added https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15994 Sorry for the delay, but I am actually in bed with a severe cold (that comes from living in southern Spain).

[jira] [Closed] (ATTIC-167) move ACE to ATTIC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jan iversen closed ATTIC-167. - Resolution: Fixed Opening new infra ticket to close down the resources. > move ACE to AT

[jira] [Updated] (ATTIC-167) move ACE to ATTIC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jan iversen updated ATTIC-167: -- Description:   * * Move committee's PMC data file to retired (if TLP) * Remove from

[jira] [Updated] (ATTIC-167) move ACE to ATTIC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jan iversen updated ATTIC-167: -- Description:   * i. Update website with Attic notice: [http://ace.apache.org/] * ** ii. Update the

[jira] [Updated] (ATTIC-167) move ACE to ATTIC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jan iversen updated ATTIC-167: -- Description:   * Obtain source control karma and point source control mails to general at attic ** i

[jira] [Updated] (ATTIC-167) move ACE to ATTIC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jan iversen updated ATTIC-167: -- Description:   * Create project page on Attic site: [http://attic.apache.org/projects/$] \{project

[jira] [Updated] (ATTIC-167) move ACE to ATTIC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] jan iversen updated ATTIC-167: -- Description:   * Remove VP entry on [http://www.apache.org/foundation/] (if TLP) * Inform users of the

  1   2   >